| Literature DB >> 24690945 |
Ravid Doron1, Dafna Lotan2, Ziv Versano3, Layla Benatav4, Motty Franko4, Shir Armoza3, Nadav Kately5, Moshe Rehavi6.
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are a major public health concern worldwide. Studies indicate that repeated exposure to adverse experiences early in life can lead to anxiety disorders in adulthood. Current treatments for anxiety disorders are characterized by a low success rate and are associated with a wide variety of side effects. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the anxiolytic effects of a novel herbal treatment, in comparison to treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram. We recently demonstrated the anxiolytic effects of these treatments in BALB mice previously exposed to one week of stress. In the present study, ICR mice were exposed to post natal maternal separation and to 4 weeks of unpredictable chronic mild stress in adolescence, and treated during or following exposure to stress with the novel herbal treatment or with escitalopram. Anxiety-like behavior was evaluated in the elevated plus maze. Blood corticosterone levels were evaluated using radioimmunoassay. Brain derived neurotrophic factor levels in the hippocampus were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We found that (1) exposure to stress in childhood and adolescence increased anxiety-like behavior in adulthood; (2) the herbal treatment reduced anxiety-like behavior, both when treated during or following exposure to stress; (3) blood corticosterone levels were reduced following treatment with the herbal treatment or escitalopram, when treated during or following exposure to stress; (4) brain derived neurotrophic factor levels in the hippocampus of mice treated with the herbal treatment or escitalopram were increased, when treated either during or following exposure to stress. This study expands our previous findings and further points to the proposed herbal compound's potential to be highly efficacious in treating anxiety disorders in humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24690945 PMCID: PMC3972209 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) procedure.
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | Day 7 | |
|
| Restraint stress | Placement in an empty cage with water at the bottom + Lights on | Tilt cages at 30 degrees | Placing mice in cages with wet sawdust | Placing mice in soiled cages of other mice | Restraint stress | Reversal of the light/dark cycle |
| (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | ||
|
| Placement in an empty cage with water at the bottom + Lights on | Tilt cages at 30 degrees | Placing mice in cages with wet sawdust | Placing mice in soiled cages of other mice | Restraint stress | Placement in an empty cage with water at the bottom + Lights on | Reversal of the light/dark cycle |
| (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | ||
|
| Tilt cages at 30 degrees | Placing mice in cages with wet sawdust | Placing mice in soiled cages of other mice | Restraint stress | Placement in an empty cage with water at the bottom + Lights on | Tilt cages at 30 degrees | Reversal of the light/dark cycle |
| (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | ||
|
| Placing mice in cages with wet sawdust | Placing mice in soiled cages of other mice | Restraint stress | Placement in an empty cage with water at the bottom + Lights on | Tilt cages at 30 degrees | Placing mice in cages with wet sawdust | Reversal of the light/dark cycle |
| (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) | (4 hours) |
Treated mice were subjected to UCMS for 4 weeks, using the listed stressors. To prevent habituation and to provide an unpredictable feature to the stressors, stressors were administered at different time points during the day.
Figure 1Experiment 2 outline.
Figure 2Experiment 3 outline.
Figure 3Effect of stress manipulation on anxiety-like-behavior in the Elevated Plus Maze.
The time spent in open arms of the EPM was significantly higher in control mice (n = 17), compared to stressed mice (n = 51). Significantly different from the control group: *p<0.05.
Figure 4Behavioral and biological effects of NHT and escitalopram treatments following exposure to stress.
Figure 4A: Treatment effect on time spent in the open arms of the EPM (saline: n = 40; NHT 15 mg/kg: n = 24; NHT 30 mg/kg: n = 22; escitalopram: n = 23). Figure 4B: Treatment effect on number of EPM closed arms entries (saline: n = 40; NHT 15 mg/kg: n = 24; NHT 30 mg/kg: n = 22; escitalopram: n = 23). Figure 4C: Treatment effect on blood corticosterone levels (saline: n = 17; NHT 15 mg/kg: n = 18; NHT 30 mg/kg: n = 18; escitalopram: n = 16). Figure 4D: Treatment effect on hippocampus BDNF levels (saline: n = 26; NHT 15 mg/kg: n = 24; NHT 30 mg/kg: n = 22; escitalopram: n = 23). Significantly different from the control group: *p<0.05, **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005, ***p<0.0001.
Figure 5Behavioral and biological effects of the NHT and escitalopram treatment during exposure to stress.
Figure 5A: Treatment effect on time spent in the open arms of the EPM (saline: n = 25; NHT 15 mg/kg: n = 20; NHT 30 mg/kg: n = 19; escitalopram: n = 20). Figure 5B: Treatment effect on number of EPM closed arms entries (saline: n = 25; NHT 15 mg/kg: n = 20; NHT 30 mg/kg: n = 19; escitalopram: n = 20). Figure 5C: Treatment effect on blood corticosterone levels (saline: n = 24; NHT 15 mg/kg: n = 17; NHT 30 mg/kg: n = 17; escitalopram: n = 17). Figure 5D: Treatment effect on hippocampus BDNF levels (saline: n = 20; NHT 15 mg/kg: n = 15; NHT 30 mg/kg: n = 12; escitalopram: n = 10). Significantly different from the control group: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.0001.