Literature DB >> 24690051

Restricting access to a suicide hotspot does not shift the problem to another location. An experiment of two river bridges in Brisbane, Australia.

Chi-Kin Law1, Jerneja Sveticic, Diego De Leo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restricting access to lethal means is a well-established strategy for suicide prevention. However, the hypothesis of subsequent method substitution remains difficult to verify. In the case of jumping from high places ('hotspots'), most studies have been unable to control for a potential shift in suicide locations. This investigation aims to evaluate the short- and long-term effect of safety barriers on Brisbane's Gateway Bridge and to examine whether there was substitution of suicide location.
METHODS: Data on suicide by jumping - between 1990 and 2012, in Brisbane, Australia - were obtained from the Queensland Suicide Register. The effects of barrier installation at the Gateway Bridge were assessed through a natural experiment setting. Descriptive and Poisson regression analyses were used.
RESULTS: Of the 277 suicides by jumping in Brisbane that were identified, almost half (n=126) occurred from the Gateway or Story Bridges. After the installation of barriers on the Gateway Bridge, in 1993, the number of suicides from this site dropped 53.0% in the period 1994-1997 (p=0.041) and a further reduction was found in subsequent years. Analyses confirmed that there was no evidence of displacement to a neighbouring suicide hotspot (Story Bridge) or other locations.
CONCLUSIONS: The safety barriers were effective in preventing suicide from the Gateway Bridge, and no evidence of substitution of location was found.
© 2014 The Authors. ANZJPH © 2014 Public Health Association of Australia.

Keywords:  Australia; access to means; method substitution; suicide hotspot; suicide prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24690051     DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  8 in total

1.  Barriers for the Research, Prevention, and Treatment of Suicidal Behavior.

Authors:  Maria A Oquendo; Alejandro Porras-Segovia
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020

2.  Suicidality in Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Merle Becker; Christoph U Correll
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Means restriction for the prevention of suicide by jumping.

Authors:  Chukwudi Okolie; Suzanne Wood; Keith Hawton; Udai Kandalama; Alexander C Glendenning; Michael Dennis; Sian F Price; Keith Lloyd; Ann John
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-25

4.  Access to means of suicide, occupation and the risk of suicide: a national study over 12 years of coronial data.

Authors:  A Milner; K Witt; H Maheen; A D LaMontagne
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 5.  The role of prediction in suicide prevention.

Authors:  Matthew Michael Large
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.986

6.  Suicide by jumping from high places in a Brazilian city: regional peculiarities as a determining factor of variation in suicide methods.

Authors:  Emerson A Nunes; Gustavo X Fernandes; João P Maia-de-Oliveira; Amannda M O Lima
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.697

7.  Cost-effectiveness of Installing Barriers at Bridge and Cliff Sites for Suicide Prevention in Australia.

Authors:  Piumee Bandara; Jane Pirkis; Angela Clapperton; Sangsoo Shin; Lay San Too; Lennart Reifels; Sandersan Onie; Andrew Page; Karl Andriessen; Karolina Krysinska; Anna Flego; Marisa Schlichthorst; Matthew J Spittal; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Long Khanh-Dao Le
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

8.  Understanding the effects of a suicide prevention strategy at a jumping site.

Authors:  Mark E Larsen; Michelle Torok; Sandersan Onie
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-02-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.