Raana Gholamzadeh Nikjoo1, Hossein Jabbari Beyrami2, Ali Jannati3, Mohammad Asghari Jaafarabadi4. 1. Department of Health Care Services Administration, Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ; Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 2. Department of community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ; Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 3. Department of Health Care Services Administration, Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ; Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 4. Medical Education Research Center, Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health and Nutrition, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to scrutinize Public- Private Partnership (PPP) models in public hospitals of different countries based on performance indicators in order to se-lect appropriated models for Iran hospitals. METHODS: In this mixed (quantitative-qualitative) study, systematic review and expert panel has been done to identify varied models of PPP as well as performance indicators. In the second step we prioritized performance indicator and PPP models based on selected performance indicators by Analytical Hierarchy process (AHP) technique. The data were analyzed by Excel 2007 and Expert Choice11 software's. RESULTS: In quality - effectiveness area, indicators like the rate of hospital infections (100%), hospital accidents prevalence rate (73%), pure rate of hospital mortality (63%), patient satisfaction percentage (53%), in accessibility equity area indicators such as average inpatient waiting time (100%) and average outpatient waiting time (74%), and in financial - efficiency area, indicators including average length of stay (100%), bed occupation ratio (99%), specific income to total cost ratio (97%) have been chosen to be the most key performance indicators. In the pri¬oritization of the PPP models clinical outsourcing, management, privatization, BOO (build, own, operate) and non-clinical outsourcing models, achieved high priority for various performance in¬dicator areas. CONCLUSION: This study had been provided the most common PPP options in the field of public hospitals and had gathered suitable evidences from experts for choosing appropriate PPP option for public hospitals. Effect of private sector presence in public hospital performance, based on which PPP options undertaken, will be different.
BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to scrutinize Public- Private Partnership (PPP) models in public hospitals of different countries based on performance indicators in order to se-lect appropriated models for Iran hospitals. METHODS: In this mixed (quantitative-qualitative) study, systematic review and expert panel has been done to identify varied models of PPP as well as performance indicators. In the second step we prioritized performance indicator and PPP models based on selected performance indicators by Analytical Hierarchy process (AHP) technique. The data were analyzed by Excel 2007 and Expert Choice11 software's. RESULTS: In quality - effectiveness area, indicators like the rate of hospital infections (100%), hospital accidents prevalence rate (73%), pure rate of hospital mortality (63%), patient satisfaction percentage (53%), in accessibility equity area indicators such as average inpatient waiting time (100%) and average outpatient waiting time (74%), and in financial - efficiency area, indicators including average length of stay (100%), bed occupation ratio (99%), specific income to total cost ratio (97%) have been chosen to be the most key performance indicators. In the pri¬oritization of the PPP models clinical outsourcing, management, privatization, BOO (build, own, operate) and non-clinical outsourcing models, achieved high priority for various performance in¬dicator areas. CONCLUSION: This study had been provided the most common PPP options in the field of public hospitals and had gathered suitable evidences from experts for choosing appropriate PPP option for public hospitals. Effect of private sector presence in public hospital performance, based on which PPP options undertaken, will be different.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hospitals; Performance indicator; Public – private partnership
Authors: J Veillard; F Champagne; N Klazinga; V Kazandjian; O A Arah; A-L Guisset Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2005-09-09 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Tuan Anh Le; Giang Hai Ha; Mai Quynh Thi Le; Lien My Hoang Tran; Duyen Thanh Thi Pham; Ninh Hai Thi Tran; Giang Thu Vu; Long Hoang Nguyen; Hai Quang Pham; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Tung Hoang Tran; Kiet Tuan Huy Pham; Bach Xuan Tran; Carl A Latkin; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho Journal: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Date: 2020-04-28
Authors: Do Hwa Byun; Rho Soon Chang; Myung-Bae Park; Hyo-Rim Son; Chun-Bae Kim Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 3.390