| Literature DB >> 24688222 |
Miaoyan Zheng1, Meilin Zhang2, Juhong Yang3, Shijing Zhao2, Shanchun Qin2, Hui Chen2, Yuxia Gao4, Guowei Huang2.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Folate insufficiency fosters a decline in the sole methyl donor, S-adenosylmethionine, and decreases methylation potential, which is associated with Alzheimer's disease in non-diabetic patients. However, little is known in diabetic patients. We analyzed plasma levels of S-adenosylmethionine, S-adenosylhomocysteine and serum level of folate in 100 elderly type 2 diabetic patients with and without mild cognitive impairment. S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteine ratio was used to reflect the methylation potential. Patients with mild cognitive impairment had significantly lower levels of S-adenosylmethionine, folate and S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteineratios. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis indicated the plasma S-adenosylmethionine, S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteine ratio and serum folate (OR, 0.96, 0.698, 0.72, respectively; p<0.05) were negatively associated with risk of mild cognitive impairment, even after adjusting for related covariates. In addition, folate level was positively correlated with S-adenosylmethionine and the S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteine ratio (r = 0.38, 0.46, respectively; p<0.05) among patients within the middle tertile of folate levels (6.3-9.1 µg/L). These findings indicate mild cognitive impairment is associated with lower levels of S-adenosylmethionine, folate and weakened methylation potential; plasma S-adenosylmethionine and methylation potential may be predicted by serum folate within a suitable range of folate concentrations in diabetic patients.Entities:
Keywords: folate; methyl donor; mild cognitive impairment; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2014 PMID: 24688222 PMCID: PMC3947971 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.13-89
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Differences in demographic and socioeconomic data
| Variables | Control group ( | MCI group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Men | 17 (34.0) | 17 (34.0) | >0.05 |
| Women | 33 (66.0) | 33 (66.0) | ||
| Education | No education | 12 (24.0) | 12 (24.0) | >0.05 |
| 1–6 years | 13 (26.0) | 13 (26.0) | ||
| 6–12 years | 19 (38.0) | 19 (38.0) | ||
| ≥12 years | 6 (12.0) | 6 (12.0) | ||
| Age (years) | 74.36 ± 4.54 | 75.16 ± 4.65 | >0.05 | |
| MMSE | 26.30 ± 2.97 | 20.40 ± 4.00 | <0.01 | |
| ADL | 22.14 ± 2.98 | 22.82 ± 3.91 | >0.05 | |
| Family per capita income | ≤¥2,000 | 17 (34.0) | 14 (28.0) | >0.05 |
| ¥2,000–3,000 | 24 (48.0) | 33 (66.0) | ||
| ≥¥3,000 | 9 (20.0) | 3 (8.9) | ||
| Marital status | Married | 31 (62.0) | 29 (58.0) | >0.05 |
| Divorced/widowed | 19 (38.0) | 21 (42.0) | ||
| Smoking status | Yes | 16 (32.0) | 15 (30.0) | >0.05 |
| No | 34 (68.0) | 35 (70.0) | ||
| Drinking status | Yes | 13 (26.0) | 7 (14.0) | >0.05 |
| No | 37 (74.0) | 43 (86.0) | ||
| Reading | Yes | 27 (54.0) | 20 (40.0) | >0.05 |
| No | 23 (46.0) | 30 (60.0) | ||
| Habit of regular exercise | Yes | 7 (14.0) | 6 (12.0) | >0.05 |
| No | 43 (86.0) | 44 (88.0) | ||
| Sleep disorders | Yes | 23 (46.0) | 20 (40.0) | >0.05 |
| No | 27 (54.0) | 30 (60.0) |
Data are presented as means ± SD or n (%). MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; ADL, activities of daily living.
Differences in clinical and biochemical indexes
| Variables | Control group ( | MCI group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.56 ± 2.88 | 26.72 ± 3.91 | >0.05 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 130.8 ± 15.9 | 135.3 ± 15.3 | >0.05 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 74.2 ± 8.6 | 75.9 ± 7.5 | >0.05 | |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | 17.0 (10.0, 22.0) | 15.0 (9.05, 20.0) | >0.05 | |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.32 (1.01, 2.01) | 1.66 (1.13, 2.26) | >0.05 | |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.94 ± 1.03 | 5.51 ± 1.11 | <0.01 | |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.35 ± 0.37 | 1.40 ± 0.29 | >0.05 | |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 8.27 ± 2.68 | 9.20 ± 2.83 | >0.05 | |
| Glycated hemoglobin A1c (%) | 8.42 ± 2.08 | 8.89 ± 2.45 | >0.05 | |
| Hypertension | Yes | 35 (70.0) | 38 (76.0) | >0.05 |
| No | 15 (30.0) | 12 (24.0) | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | Yes | 25 (50.0) | 31 (62.0) | >0.05 |
| No | 25 (50.0) | 19 (38.0) | ||
| Diabetic retinopathy | Yes | 10 (20.0) | 21 (42.0) | <0.05 |
| No | 40 (80.0) | 29 (58.0) | ||
| Diabetic nephropathy | Yes | 15 (30.0) | 19 (38.0) | >0.05 |
| No | 35 (70.0) | 31 (62.0) |
Data are presented means ± SD, median (inter-quartile range), or n (%). MCI, mild cognitive impairment. HDL: high-density lipoprotein.
Fig. 1Differences in plasma SAM (a), SAH (b), SAM/SAH ratio (c), serum folate (d) and Hcy (e) between the MCI and control groups. MCI, mild cognitive impairment; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAH, S-Adenosylhomocysteine; Hcy, homocysteine. Values represent the means ± SD. *p<0.05; **p<0.01 vs the controls.
Odds ratios of mild cognitive impairment for folate, methyl donor and Hcy
| Variables | unadjusted | Adjusted ↑ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95%CI) | |||
| SAM (per nmol/L increase) | 0.97 (0.9, 50.99) | 0.005 | 0.96 (0.93, 0.99) | <0.05 |
| SAH (per nmol/L increase) | 1.20 (1.02, 1.42) | 0.03 | 1.22 (0.98, 1.53) | >0.05 |
| SAM/SAH ratio | 0.71 (0.56, 0.89) | 0.004 | 0.68 (0.50, 0.91) | <0.05 |
| Folate (per µg/L increase) | 0.87 (0.78, 0.98) | 0.02 | 0.72 (0.56, 0.93) | <0.05 |
| Hcy (per µg/L increase) | 1.28 (1.02, 1.59) | 0.034 | 1.34 (0.97, 1.85) | >0.05 |
↑ Adjusted for duration of diabetes (years), GHbA1c (%), diabetic retinopathy (yes/no), and cardiovascular disease risk factors, including body mass index (kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no), systolic blood pressure (mmHg), triglycerides (mmol/L), and total cholesterol(mmol/L). SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAH, S-Adenosylhomocysteine; Hcy, homocysteine.
Fig. 2The correlations between folate and methyl donor levels by tertiles of folate levels. SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; Hcy, homocysteine. The level of folate was significantly positively correlated with that of SAM and the SAM/SAH ratio and negatively correlated with that of SAH among patients with folate levels between 6.3 and 9.1 µg/L (p<0.05, d–f), but no significant correlation existed among patients with folate levels less than 6.3 µg/L (p>0.05, a–c) or over 9.1 µg/L (p>0.05, g–i).