I Popovich1, N Dalbeth, A Doyle, Q Reeves, F M McQueen. 1. Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Few imaging studies have investigated cartilage in gout. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can image cartilage damage and also reveals other features of gouty arthropathy. The objective was to develop and validate a system for quantifying cartilage damage in gout. METHODS: 3-T MRI scans of the wrist were obtained in 40 gout patients. MRI cartilage damage was quantified using an adaptation of the radiographic Sharp van der Heijde score. Two readers scored cartilage loss at 7 wrist joints: 0 (normal), 1 (partial narrowing), 2 (complete narrowing) and concomitant osteoarthritis was recorded. Bone erosion, bone oedema and synovitis were scored (RAMRIS) and tophi were assessed. Correlations between radiographic and MRI cartilage scores were investigated, as was the reliability of the MRI cartilage score and its associations. RESULTS: The GOut MRI Cartilage Score (GOMRICS) was highly correlated with the total Sharp van der Heijde (SvdH) score and the joint space narrowing component (R = 0.8 and 0.71 respectively, p < 0.001). Reliability was high (intraobserver, interobserver ICCs = 0.87 [0.57-0.97], 0.64 [0.41-0.79] respectively), and improved on unenhanced scans; interobserver ICC = 0.82 [0.49-0.95]. Cartilage damage was predominantly focal (82% of lesions) and identified in 40 out of 280 (14%) of joints. Cartilage scores correlated with bone erosion (R = 0.57), tophus size (R = 0.52), and synovitis (R = 0.55), but not bone oedema scores. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to investigate cartilage in gout. Cartilage damage was relatively uncommon, focal, and associated with bone erosions, tophi and synovitis, but not bone oedema. This emphasises the unique pathophysiology of gout.
OBJECTIVE: Few imaging studies have investigated cartilage in gout. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can image cartilage damage and also reveals other features of gouty arthropathy. The objective was to develop and validate a system for quantifying cartilage damage in gout. METHODS: 3-T MRI scans of the wrist were obtained in 40 goutpatients. MRI cartilage damage was quantified using an adaptation of the radiographic Sharp van der Heijde score. Two readers scored cartilage loss at 7 wrist joints: 0 (normal), 1 (partial narrowing), 2 (complete narrowing) and concomitant osteoarthritis was recorded. Bone erosion, bone oedema and synovitis were scored (RAMRIS) and tophi were assessed. Correlations between radiographic and MRI cartilage scores were investigated, as was the reliability of the MRI cartilage score and its associations. RESULTS: The GOut MRI Cartilage Score (GOMRICS) was highly correlated with the total Sharp van der Heijde (SvdH) score and the joint space narrowing component (R = 0.8 and 0.71 respectively, p < 0.001). Reliability was high (intraobserver, interobserver ICCs = 0.87 [0.57-0.97], 0.64 [0.41-0.79] respectively), and improved on unenhanced scans; interobserver ICC = 0.82 [0.49-0.95]. Cartilage damage was predominantly focal (82% of lesions) and identified in 40 out of 280 (14%) of joints. Cartilage scores correlated with bone erosion (R = 0.57), tophus size (R = 0.52), and synovitis (R = 0.55), but not bone oedema scores. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to investigate cartilage in gout. Cartilage damage was relatively uncommon, focal, and associated with bone erosions, tophi and synovitis, but not bone oedema. This emphasises the unique pathophysiology of gout.
Authors: Rennie G Howard; Michael H Pillinger; Soterios Gyftopoulos; Ralf G Thiele; Christopher J Swearingen; Jonathan Samuels Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: F Eckstein; R J Buck; D Burstein; H C Charles; J Crim; M Hudelmaier; D J Hunter; G Hutchins; C Jackson; V Byers Kraus; N E Lane; T M Link; L S Majumdar; S Mazzuca; P V Prasad; T J Schnitzer; M S Taljanovic; A Vaz; B Wyman; M-P Hellio Le Graverand Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-02-18 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Carol Muehleman; Jun Li; Thomas Aigner; Lev Rappoport; Eric Mattson; Carol Hirschmugl; Koichi Masuda; Ann K Rosenthal Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Fiona M McQueen; Alexandra McHaffie; Andrew Clarke; Arier C Lee; Quentin Reeves; Barbara Curteis; Nicola Dalbeth Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Jennifer S Weaver; Ernest R Vina; Peter L Munk; Andrea S Klauser; Jamie M Elifritz; Mihra S Taljanovic Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Nicola Dalbeth; Kenneth G Saag; William E Palmer; Hyon K Choi; Barbara Hunt; Patricia A MacDonald; Ulrich Thienel; Lhanoo Gunawardhana Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 10.995