Literature DB >> 24687169

Effect of metformin on left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction in patients without diabetes: the GIPS-III randomized clinical trial.

Chris P H Lexis1, Iwan C C van der Horst2, Erik Lipsic1, Wouter G Wieringa1, Rudolf A de Boer1, Ad F M van den Heuvel1, Hindrik W van der Werf1, Remco A J Schurer1, Gabija Pundziute1, Eng S Tan1, Wybe Nieuwland1, Hendrik M Willemsen1, Bernard Dorhout1, Barbara H W Molmans3, Anouk N A van der Horst-Schrivers4, Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel4, Gert J ter Horst5, Albert C van Rossum6, Jan G P Tijssen7, Hans L Hillege8, Bart J G L de Smet9, Pim van der Harst1, Dirk J van Veldhuisen1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Metformin treatment is associated with improved outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes. In animal experimental studies metformin preserves left ventricular function.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of metformin treatment on preservation of left ventricular function in patients without diabetes presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted among 380 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI at the University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands, between January 1, 2011, and May 26, 2013.
INTERVENTIONS: Metformin hydrochloride (500 mg) (n = 191) or placebo (n = 189) twice daily for 4 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary efficacy measure was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 4 months, assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. A secondary efficacy measure was the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration after 4 months. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; the combined end point of death, reinfarction, or target-lesion revascularization) was recorded until 4 months as a secondary efficacy measure.
RESULTS: At 4 months, all patients were alive and none were lost to follow-up. LVEF was 53.1% (95% CI, 51.6%-54.6%) in the metformin group (n = 135), compared with 54.8% (95% CI, 53.5%-56.1%) (P = .10) in the placebo group (n = 136). NT-proBNP concentration was 167 ng/L in the metformin group (interquartile range [IQR], 65-393 ng/L) and 167 ng/L in the placebo group (IQR, 74-383 ng/L) (P = .66). MACE were observed in 6 patients (3.1%) in the metformin group and in 2 patients (1.1%) in the placebo group (P = .16). Creatinine concentration (79 µmol/L [IQR, 70-87 µmol/L] vs 79 µmol/L [IQR, 72-89 µmol/L], P = .61) and glycated hemoglobin (5.9% [IQR, 5.6%-6.1%] vs 5.9% [IQR, 5.7%-6.1%], P = .15) were not significantly different between both groups. No cases of lactic acidosis were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients without diabetes presenting with STEMI and undergoing primary PCI, the use of metformin compared with placebo did not result in improved LVEF after 4 months. The present findings do not support the use of metformin in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01217307.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687169     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.3315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  59 in total

Review 1.  Taming expectations of metformin as a treatment to extend healthspan.

Authors:  Adam R Konopka; Benjamin F Miller
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 7.713

2.  Hotline update of clinical trials and registries presented at the American College of Cardiology Congress 2014.

Authors:  Dirk Westermann; Reinhold Kreutz; Claudius Jacobshagen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Acute coronary syndromes: Metformin not associated with improved left ventricular function after STEMI in patients without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Bryony M Mearns
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  "Heart failure, whole-body insulin resistance and myocardial insulin resistance: An intriguing puzzle".

Authors:  Paola Gargiulo; Pasquale Perrone-Filardi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Metformin as a Tool to Target Aging.

Authors:  Nir Barzilai; Jill P Crandall; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Mark A Espeland
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 27.287

6.  Exposure to occupational air pollution and cardiac function in workers of the Esfahan Steel Industry, Iran.

Authors:  Jafar Golshahi; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Mohammad Saqira; Reihaneh Zavar; Mostafa Sadeghifar; Hamidreza Roohafza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  The Role of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Sven M Francque
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2014-07

8.  Metformin prevents ischaemic ventricular fibrillation in metabolically normal pigs.

Authors:  Li Lu; Shuyu Ye; Rebecca L Scalzo; Jane E B Reusch; Clifford R Greyson; Gregory G Schwartz
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Functional interplay between liver X receptor and AMP-activated protein kinase α inhibits atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice - a new anti-atherogenic strategy.

Authors:  Chuanrui Ma; Wenwen Zhang; Xiaoxiao Yang; Ying Liu; Lipei Liu; Ke Feng; Xiaomeng Zhang; Shu Yang; Lei Sun; Miao Yu; Jie Yang; Xiaoju Li; Wenquan Hu; Robert Q Miao; Yan Zhu; Luyuan Li; Jihong Han; Yuanli Chen; Yajun Duan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Effect of Intracoronary Metformin on Myocardial Infarct Size in Swine.

Authors:  George Techiryan; Brian R Weil; Beth A Palka; John M Canty
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.