Literature DB >> 24686855

Children's auditory working memory performance in degraded listening conditions.

Homira Osman, Jessica R Sullivan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to determine (a) whether school-age children with typical hearing demonstrate poorer auditory working memory performance in multitalker babble at degraded signal-to-noise ratios than in quiet; and (b) whether the amount of cognitive demand of the task contributed to differences in performance in noise. It was hypothesized that stressing the working memory system with the presence of noise would impede working memory processes in real time and result in poorer working memory performance in degraded conditions.
METHOD: Twenty children with typical hearing between 8 and 10 years old were tested using 4 auditory working memory tasks (Forward Digit Recall, Backward Digit Recall, Listening Recall Primary, and Listening Recall Secondary). Stimuli were from the standardized Working Memory Test Battery for Children. Each task was administered in quiet and in 4-talker babble noise at 0 dB and -5 dB signal-to-noise ratios.
RESULTS: Children's auditory working memory performance was systematically decreased in the presence of multitalker babble noise compared with quiet. Differences between low-complexity and high-complexity tasks were observed, with children performing more poorly on tasks with greater storage and processing demands. There was no interaction between noise and complexity of task. All tasks were negatively impacted similarly by the addition of noise.
CONCLUSIONS: Auditory working memory performance was negatively impacted by the presence of multitalker babble noise. Regardless of complexity of task, noise had a similar effect on performance. These findings suggest that the addition of noise inhibits auditory working memory processes in real time for school-age children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24686855     DOI: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  9 in total

1.  Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).

Authors:  Adrienne S Roman; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children: Effects of Auditory Access, Age, and Semantic Context.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; David Kessler; Kelsey Klein; Meredith Spratford; Jacob J Oleson; Anne Welhaven; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  [Guideline: Auditory processing and perception disorders: Proposal for treatment and management of APD : S1 guideline of the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology].

Authors:  R Schönweiler; C Kiese-Himmel; K Plotz; A Nickisch; A Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Developmental trends in the facilitation of multisensory objects with distractors.

Authors:  Harriet C Downing; Ayla Barutchu; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-20

5.  An analysis of error patterns in children's backward digit recall in noise.

Authors:  Homira Osman; Jessica R Sullivan
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

6.  Evaluating effectiveness of dynamic soundfield system in the classroom.

Authors:  Aline Duarte da Cruz; Kelly Cristina Alves Silvério; Aline Roberta Aceituno Da Costa; Adriane Lima Mortari Moret; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Incidental category learning and cognitive load in a multisensory environment across childhood.

Authors:  H J Broadbent; T Osborne; M Rea; A Peng; D Mareschal; N Z Kirkham
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-01-08

8.  How Children Perceive the Acoustic Environment of Their School.

Authors:  Karl Jonas Brännström; Erika Johansson; Daniel Vigertsson; David J Morris; Birgitta Sahlén; Viveka Lyberg-Åhlander
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Amount of Hearing Aid Use Impacts Neural Oscillatory Dynamics Underlying Verbal Working Memory Processing for Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Elizabeth A Walker; Jacob A Eastman; Michaela R Frenzel; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.