Literature DB >> 24686292

Multivariable dynamic ankle mechanical impedance with relaxed muscles.

Hyunglae Lee, Hermano Igo Krebs, Neville Hogan.   

Abstract

Neurological or biomechanical disorders may distort ankle mechanical impedance and thereby impair locomotor function. This paper presents a quantitative characterization of multivariable ankle mechanical impedance of young healthy subjects when their muscles were relaxed, to serve as a baseline to compare with pathophysiological ankle properties of biomechanically and/or neurologically impaired patients. Measurements using a highly backdrivable wearable ankle robot combined with multi-input multi-output stochastic system identification methods enabled reliable characterization of ankle mechanical impedance in two degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) simultaneously, the sagittal and frontal planes. The characterization included important ankle properties unavailable from single DOF studies: coupling between DOFs and anisotropy as a function of frequency. Ankle impedance in joint coordinates showed responses largely consistent with a second-order system consisting of inertia, viscosity, and stiffness in both seated (knee flexed) and standing (knee straightened) postures. Stiffness in the sagittal plane was greater than in the frontal plane and furthermore, was greater when standing than when seated, most likely due to the stretch of bi-articular muscles (medial and lateral gastrocnemius). Very low off-diagonal partial coherences implied negligible coupling between dorsiflexion-plantarflexion and inversion-eversion. The directions of principal axes were tilted slightly counterclockwise from the original joint coordinates. The directional variation (anisotropy) of ankle impedance in the 2-D space formed by rotations in the sagittal and frontal planes exhibited a characteristic "peanut" shape, weak in inversion-eversion over a wide range of frequencies from the stiffness dominated region up to the inertia dominated region. Implications for the assessment of neurological and biomechanical impairments are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24686292      PMCID: PMC4696764          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2313838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  27 in total

1.  The axis of rotation at the ankle joint in man; its influence upon the form of the talus and the mobility of the fibula.

Authors:  C H BARNETT; J R NAPIER
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1952-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Multivariable static ankle mechanical impedance with relaxed muscles.

Authors:  Hyunglae Lee; Patrick Ho; Mohammad A Rastgaar; Hermano I Krebs; Neville Hogan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Oscillation of the human ankle joint in response to applied sinusoidal torque on the foot.

Authors:  G C Agarwal; G L Gottlieb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Relating agonist-antagonist electromyograms to joint torque during isometric, quasi-isotonic, nonfatiguing contractions.

Authors:  E A Clancy; N Hogan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Identification of intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness dynamics.

Authors:  R E Kearney; R B Stein; L Parameswaran
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Position dependence of ankle joint dynamics--I. Passive mechanics.

Authors:  P L Weiss; R E Kearney; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with displacement amplitude.

Authors:  R E Kearney; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  The effect of locomotor training combined with functional electrical stimulation in chronic spinal cord injured subjects: walking and reflex studies.

Authors:  Hugues Barbeau; Michel Ladouceur; Mehdi M Mirbagheri; Robert E Kearney
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2002-10

9.  A prospective study of ankle injury risk factors.

Authors:  J F Baumhauer; D M Alosa; A F Renström; S Trevino; B Beynnon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Separate quantification of reflex and nonreflex components of spastic hypertonia in chronic hemiparesis.

Authors:  Sun G Chung; Elton van Rey; Zhiqiang Bai; W Zev Rymer; Elliot J Roth; Li-Qun Zhang
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  6 in total

1.  Activation-Dependent Changes in Soleus Length-Tension Behavior Augment Ankle Joint Quasi-Stiffness.

Authors:  William H Clark; Jason R Franz
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Summary of Human Ankle Mechanical Impedance During Walking.

Authors:  Hyunglae Lee; Elliott J Rouse; Hermano Igo Krebs
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  Multivariable dynamic ankle mechanical impedance with active muscles.

Authors:  Hyunglae Lee; Hermano Igo Krebs; Neville Hogan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Mechanical Impedance of the Non-loaded Lower Leg with Relaxed Muscles in the Transverse Plane.

Authors:  Evandro Maicon Ficanha; Guilherme Aramizo Ribeiro; Mohammad Rastgaar
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-08

5.  Sex Differences in Human Ankle Stiffness During Standing Balance.

Authors:  Ermyntrude Adjei; Varun Nalam; Hyunglae Lee
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-10-09

6.  A Configurable Architecture for Two Degree-of-Freedom Variable Stiffness Actuators to Match the Compliant Behavior of Human Joints.

Authors:  Simon Lemerle; Manuel G Catalano; Antonio Bicchi; Giorgio Grioli
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-03-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.