Literature DB >> 24685531

Cervical screening and cervical cancer death among older women: a population-based, case-control study.

Alison S Rustagi, Aruna Kamineni, Sheila Weinmann, Susan D Reed, Polly Newcomb, Noel S Weiss.   

Abstract

Recent research suggests that cervical screening of older women is associated with a considerable decrease in cervical cancer incidence. We sought to quantify the efficacy of cervical cytology screening to reduce death from this disease. Among enrollees of 2 US health plans, we compared Papanicolaou smear screening histories of women aged 55-79 years who died of cervical cancer during 1980-2010 (cases) to those of women at risk of cervical cancer (controls). Controls were matched 2:1 to cases on health plan, age, and enrollment duration. Cytology screening during the detectable preclinical phase, estimated as the 5-7 years before diagnosis during which cervical neoplasia is asymptomatic but cytologically detectable, was ascertained from medical records. A total of 39 cases and 80 controls were eligible. The odds ratio of cervical cancer death associated with screening during the presumed detectable preclinical phase was 0.26 (95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.63) after adjustment for matching characteristics, smoking, marital status, and race/ethnicity using logistic regression. We estimate that cervical cytology screening of all women aged 55-79 years in the United States could avert 630 deaths annually. These results provide a minimum estimate of the efficacy of human papillomavirus DNA screening-a more sensitive test-to reduce cervical cancer death among older women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Papanicolaou smear; case-control studies; screening; uterine cervical neoplasms; women's health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24685531      PMCID: PMC3992820          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  32 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  N E Day
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; J Pontén; M Zack; H O Adami
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  When does it pay to break the matches for analysis of a matched-pairs design?

Authors:  H S Lynn; C E McCulloch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Approaches to the analysis of case-control studies of the efficacy of screening for cancer.

Authors:  N S Weiss; B McKnight; N G Stevens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Case-control studies of screening efficacy: the use of persons newly diagnosed with cancer who later sustain an unfavorable outcome.

Authors:  N S Weiss; D Lazovich
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Use of the logistic model in retrospective studies.

Authors:  R Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A comparison of physician and patient reports of Pap smear histories.

Authors:  S D Walter; E A Clarke; J Hatcher; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures.

Authors:  N P Gordon; R A Hiatt; D I Lampert
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-04-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for Pap smear histories.

Authors:  M T McKenna; M Speers; K Mallin; R Warnecke
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories.

Authors:  P Sasieni; J Adams; J Cuzick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  No Association Between Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Reduced Cancer-Related Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Andrew M Moon; Noel S Weiss; Lauren A Beste; Feng Su; Samuel B Ho; Ga-Young Jin; Elliott Lowy; Kristin Berry; George N Ioannou
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Cervical Cancer Screening and Incidence by Age: Unmet Needs Near and After the Stopping Age for Screening.

Authors:  Mary C White; Meredith L Shoemaker; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Knowledge and acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening among women in Karnataka, India.

Authors:  Martha P Montgomery; Tanaka Dune; Prasanna K Shetty; Avinash K Shetty
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Evidence of disrupted high-risk human papillomavirus DNA in morphologically normal cervices of older women.

Authors:  Sarah M Leonard; Merlin Pereira; Sally Roberts; Kate Cuschieri; Gerard Nuovo; Ramanand Athavale; Lawrence Young; Raji Ganesan; Ciarán B Woodman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Francesca Pesola; Alejandra Castañón; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Influence of HIV/AIDS on Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study From Tanzania.

Authors:  Ramadhani S Chambuso; Stephen Shadrack; Salum J Lidenge; Ntoli Mwakibete; Rui M Medeiros
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01

7.  Screening is associated with a lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma-related mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Feng Su; Noel S Weiss; Lauren A Beste; Andrew M Moon; Ga-Young Jin; Pamela Green; Kristin Berry; George N Ioannou
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  The association between cervical cancer screening participation and the deprivation index of the location of the family doctor's office.

Authors:  Fanny Serman; Jonathan Favre; Valérie Deken; Lydia Guittet; Claire Collins; Michaël Rochoy; Nassir Messaadi; Alain Duhamel; Ludivine Launay; Christophe Berkhout; Thibaut Raginel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population-based case-control study in the United States.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Peter D Sasieni; Christopher Mathews; Charles L Wiggins; Michael Robertson; Yolanda J McDonald; Daniel W Goldberg; Isabel C Scarinci; Jack Cuzick; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 7.316

10.  Determinants of Mortality among Cervical Cancer Patients Attending in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: Institutional-Based Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Mulugeta Wassie; Beletech Fentie; Tseganesh Asefa
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.