Lesley A Jarvis1, Rongxiao Zhang2, David J Gladstone3, Shudong Jiang4, Whitney Hitchcock5, Oscar D Friedman4, Adam K Glaser4, Michael Jermyn4, Brian W Pogue6. 1. Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Norris Cotton Cancer Center at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Electronic address: Lesley.a.jarvis@hitchcock.org. 2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. 3. Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Norris Cotton Cancer Center at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 4. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. 5. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. 6. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether Cherenkov light imaging can visualize radiation therapy in real time during breast radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An intensified charge-coupled device (CCD) camera was synchronized to the 3.25-μs radiation pulses of the clinical linear accelerator with the intensifier set × 100. Cherenkov images were acquired continuously (2.8 frames/s) during fractionated whole breast irradiation with each frame an accumulation of 100 radiation pulses (approximately 5 monitor units). RESULTS: The first patient images ever created are used to illustrate that Cherenkov emission can be visualized as a video during conditions typical for breast radiation therapy, even with complex treatment plans, mixed energies, and modulated treatment fields. Images were generated correlating to the superficial dose received by the patient and potentially the location of the resulting skin reactions. Major blood vessels are visible in the image, providing the potential to use these as biological landmarks for improved geometric accuracy. The potential for this system to detect radiation therapy misadministrations, which can result from hardware malfunction or patient positioning setup errors during individual fractions, is shown. CONCLUSIONS: Cherenkoscopy is a unique method for visualizing surface dose resulting in real-time quality control. We propose that this system could detect radiation therapy errors in everyday clinical practice at a time when these errors can be corrected to result in improved safety and quality of radiation therapy.
PURPOSE: To determine whether Cherenkov light imaging can visualize radiation therapy in real time during breast radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An intensified charge-coupled device (CCD) camera was synchronized to the 3.25-μs radiation pulses of the clinical linear accelerator with the intensifier set × 100. Cherenkov images were acquired continuously (2.8 frames/s) during fractionated whole breast irradiation with each frame an accumulation of 100 radiation pulses (approximately 5 monitor units). RESULTS: The first patient images ever created are used to illustrate that Cherenkov emission can be visualized as a video during conditions typical for breast radiation therapy, even with complex treatment plans, mixed energies, and modulated treatment fields. Images were generated correlating to the superficial dose received by the patient and potentially the location of the resulting skin reactions. Major blood vessels are visible in the image, providing the potential to use these as biological landmarks for improved geometric accuracy. The potential for this system to detect radiation therapy misadministrations, which can result from hardware malfunction or patient positioning setup errors during individual fractions, is shown. CONCLUSIONS: Cherenkoscopy is a unique method for visualizing surface dose resulting in real-time quality control. We propose that this system could detect radiation therapy errors in everyday clinical practice at a time when these errors can be corrected to result in improved safety and quality of radiation therapy.
Authors: Adam K Glaser; Rongxiao Zhang; Jacqueline M Andreozzi; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Tianshun Miao; Heather Petroccia; Yunhe Xie; Michael Jermyn; Maxine Perroni-Scharf; Namit Kapoor; James M Mahoney; Timothy C Zhu; Petr Bruza; Benjamin B Williams; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2020-06-03
Authors: Clare Snyder; Brian W Pogue; Michael Jermyn; Irwin Tendler; Jacqueline M Andreozzi; Petr Bruza; Venkat Krishnaswamy; David J Gladstone; Lesley A Jarvis Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-01-02
Authors: Rongxiao Zhang; Adam K Glaser; Jacqueline Andreozzi; Shudong Jiang; Lesley A Jarvis; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 3.207