Literature DB >> 24685325

Usefulness of the QRS-T angle to improve long-term risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.

Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín1, Alejandro Virgós-Lamela2, Noelia Bouzas-Cruz2, Andrea López-López2, María Castiñeira-Busto2, Rita Fernández-Garda2, Alberto García-Castelo2, Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero2, José María García-Acuña2, Emad Abu-Assi2, José Ramón González-Juanatey2.   

Abstract

In light of the low cost, the widespread availability of the electrocardiogram, and the increasing economic burden of the health-related problems, we aimed to analyze the prognostic value of automatic frontal QRS-T angle to predict mortality in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). About 467 consecutive patients discharged with diagnosis of AMI and with LV ejection fraction ≤40% were followed during 3.9 years (2.1 to 5.9). From them, 217 patients (47.5%) died. The frontal QRS-T angle was higher in patients who died (116.6±52.8 vs 77.9±55.1, respectively, p<0.001). The QRS-T angle value of 90° was the most accurate to predict all-cause cardiac death. After multivariate analysis, frontal QRS-T angle remained as an excellent predictor of all-cause and cardiac deaths, increasing the mortality 6% per each 10°. For the global mortality, the hazard ratio for a QRS-T angle>90° was 2.180 (1.558 to 3.050), and for the combined end point of cardiac death and appropriate implantable cardioverter defribrillator therapy, it was 2.385 (1.570 to 3.623). This independent predictive value was maintained even after adjusting by bundle brunch block, ST-elevation AMI, and its localization. In conclusion, a wide automatic frontal QRS-T angle (>90°) is a good discriminator of long-term mortality in patients with LV systolic dysfunction after an AMI. The ability to easily measure it from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram together with its prognostic value makes the frontal QRS-T angle an attractive tool to help clinicians to improve risk stratification of those patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24685325     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.01.406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

1.  The role of baseline and post-procedural frontal plane QRS-T angles for cardiac risk assessment in patients with acute STEMI.

Authors:  Tugce Colluoglu; Zulkif Tanriverdi; Baris Unal; Emin Evren Ozcan; Huseyin Dursun; Dayimi Kaya
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  The Value of Frontal Planar QRS-T Angle in Patients without Angiographically Apparent Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Mutlu Gungor; Murat Celik; Emre Yalcinkaya; Alper Tolga Polat; Uygar Cagdas Yuksel; Erkan Yildirim; Serdar Firtina; Baris Bugan; Ali Can Ozer
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Changes of Virtual Planar QRS and T Vectors Derived from Holter in the Populations with and without Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Jia Chen; Yubi Lin; Jian Yu; Wanqun Chen; Zhe Xu; Zhenzhen Yang; Chuqian Zeng; Wenfeng Li; Xiaoshu Lai; Qiji Lu; Jingwen Zhou; Bixia Tian; Jing Xu; Yanping Lin; Zuoyi Du; Aidong Zhang
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  The Effect of Low-Flow and Normal-Flow Desflurane Anesthesia on the Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty Operation: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Tugba Bingol Tanriverdi; Mehmet Tercan; Gulcin Patmano; Zulkif Tanriverdi; Ayse Güsun Halitoglu; Ahmet Kaya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  The Relationship Between In-Hospital Mortality and Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Ercan Tastan; Ümit İnci
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-28

6.  The relationship between myocardial bridge and frontal QRS-T angle.

Authors:  Mustafa Begenc Tascanov; Zulkif Tanriverdi; Fatih Gungoren; Gulsen Genc Tapar; Asuman Bicer
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-09-05

7.  Spatial/Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Cardiac Mortality: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinlin Zhang; Qingqing Zhu; Li Zhu; He Jiang; Jun Xie; Wei Huang; Biao Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prognostic Significance of Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Sheng-Na Li; Xin-Lin Zhang; Guo-Long Cai; Ruo-Wei Lin; He Jiang; Jian-Zhou Chen; Biao Xu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  B Zadeh; J M Wambach; M Lambers; K Nassenstein; C J Jensen; O Bruder
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.