G D Quinn1, A A Giuseppetti2, K H Hoffman2. 1. Volpe Research Center, American Dental Association Foundation, Stop 854-6, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 29899, USA. Electronic address: george.quinn@nist.gov. 2. Volpe Research Center, American Dental Association Foundation, Stop 854-6, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 29899, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The edge chipping test was used to measure the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM dental restoration ceramics and resin composites. METHODS: An edge chipping machine was used to evaluate six materials including one feldspathic porcelain, two glass ceramics, a filled resin-composite, a yttria-stabilized zirconia, and a new ceramic-resin composite material. Force versus edge distance data were collected over a broad range of forces and distances. Data were analyzed by several approaches and several chipping resistance parameters were evaluated. The effects of using different indenter types were explored. RESULTS: The force versus distance trends were usually nonlinear with good fits to a power law equation with exponents usually ranging from 1.2 to 1.9. The order of chipping resistance (from least to greatest) was: feldspathic porcelain and a leucite glass ceramic (which were similar), followed by the lithium disilicate glass ceramic and the two resin composites (which were similar), and finally the zirconia which had the greatest resistance to chipping. Chipping with a Vickers indenter required 28-45% more force than with the sharp conical 120° indenter. The two indenters rank materials approximately the same way. The power law exponents were very similar for the two indenters for a particular material, but the exponents varied with material. The Rockwell C indenter gives different power law trends and rankings. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the variations in the trends and indenters, simple comparisons between materials can be made by chipping with sharp conical 120° or Vickers indenters at 0.50mm. Broad distance ranges are recommended for trend evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: The edge chipping test was used to measure the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM dental restoration ceramics and resin composites. METHODS: An edge chipping machine was used to evaluate six materials including one feldspathic porcelain, two glass ceramics, a filled resin-composite, a yttria-stabilized zirconia, and a new ceramic-resin composite material. Force versus edge distance data were collected over a broad range of forces and distances. Data were analyzed by several approaches and several chipping resistance parameters were evaluated. The effects of using different indenter types were explored. RESULTS: The force versus distance trends were usually nonlinear with good fits to a power law equation with exponents usually ranging from 1.2 to 1.9. The order of chipping resistance (from least to greatest) was: feldspathic porcelain and a leucite glass ceramic (which were similar), followed by the lithium disilicate glass ceramic and the two resin composites (which were similar), and finally the zirconia which had the greatest resistance to chipping. Chipping with a Vickers indenter required 28-45% more force than with the sharp conical 120° indenter. The two indenters rank materials approximately the same way. The power law exponents were very similar for the two indenters for a particular material, but the exponents varied with material. The Rockwell C indenter gives different power law trends and rankings. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the variations in the trends and indenters, simple comparisons between materials can be made by chipping with sharp conical 120° or Vickers indenters at 0.50mm. Broad distance ranges are recommended for trend evaluation.
Authors: Leina Nakanishi; Marina R Kaizer; Suzane Brandeburski; Sergio S Cava; Alvaro Della Bona; Yu Zhang; Rafael R Moraes Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 5.304