Literature DB >> 24685099

Macrolides and lincosamides in cattle and pigs: use and development of antimicrobial resistance.

Satu Pyörälä1, Keith Edward Baptiste2, Boudewijn Catry3, Engeline van Duijkeren4, Christina Greko5, Miguel A Moreno6, M Constança Matias Ferreira Pomba7, Merja Rantala8, Modestas Ružauskas9, Pascal Sanders10, E John Threlfall11, Jordi Torren-Edo12, Karolina Törneke13.   

Abstract

Macrolides and lincosamides are important antibacterials for the treatment of many common infections in cattle and pigs. Products for in-feed medication with these compounds in combination with other antimicrobials are commonly used in Europe. Most recently approved injectable macrolides have very long elimination half-lives in both pigs and cattle, which allows once-only dosing regimens. Both in-feed medication and use of long-acting injections result in low concentrations of the active substance for prolonged periods, which causes concerns related to development of antimicrobial resistance. Acquired resistance to macrolides and lincosamides among food animal pathogens, including some zoonotic bacteria, has now emerged. A comparison of studies on the prevalence of resistance is difficult, since for many micro-organisms no agreed standards for susceptibility testing are available. With animal pathogens, the most dramatic increase in resistance has been seen in the genus Brachyspira. Resistance towards macrolides and lincosamides has also been detected in staphylococci isolated from pigs and streptococci from cattle. This article reviews the use of macrolides and lincosamides in cattle and pigs, as well as the development of resistance in target and some zoonotic pathogens. The focus of the review is on European conditions.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Consumption; Food animal; Lincosamides; Macrolides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24685099     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  16 in total

1.  F4- and F18-Positive Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Isolates from Diarrhea of Postweaning Pigs: Genomic Characterization.

Authors:  Vanesa García; Michela Gambino; Karl Pedersen; Svend Haugegaard; John Elmerdahl Olsen; Ana Herrero-Fresno
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The new macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance gene erm(45) is located within a genomic island in Staphylococcus fleurettii.

Authors:  Juliette R K Wipf; Sybille Schwendener; Jesper Boye Nielsen; Henrik Westh; Vincent Perreten
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Dinuclear vs. Mononuclear Copper(II) Coordination Species of Tylosin and Tilmicosin in Non-Aqueous Solutions.

Authors:  Ivayla Pantcheva; Radoslava Stamboliyska; Nikolay Petkov; Alia Tadjer; Svetlana Simova; Radostina Stoyanova; Rositza Kukeva; Petar Dorkov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility of environmental bacteria from mastitic milk of pastured dairy cows of S. Miguel (Azores).

Authors:  João Simões; M Branco; J Andrade; A Müller
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 5.  The Food Production Environment and the Development of Antimicrobial Resistance in Human Pathogens of Animal Origin.

Authors:  Manjusha Lekshmi; Parvathi Ammini; Sanath Kumar; Manuel F Varela
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-03-14

6.  Frequent isolation of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 among healthy pigs in Portugal.

Authors:  Teresa Conceição; Hermínia de Lencastre; Marta Aires-de-Sousa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prevalence, molecular epidemiology, and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from swine in southern Italy.

Authors:  Mattia Pirolo; Angela Gioffrè; Daniela Visaggio; Monica Gherardi; Grazia Pavia; Pasquale Samele; Lucia Ciambrone; Rossella Di Natale; Giovanna Spatari; Francesco Casalinuovo; Paolo Visca
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Surveillance of Enterococcus spp. reveals distinct species and antimicrobial resistance diversity across a One-Health continuum.

Authors:  Rahat Zaheer; Shaun R Cook; Ruth Barbieri; Noriko Goji; Andrew Cameron; Aaron Petkau; Rodrigo Ortega Polo; Lisa Tymensen; Courtney Stamm; Jiming Song; Sherry Hannon; Tineke Jones; Deirdre Church; Calvin W Booker; Kingsley Amoako; Gary Van Domselaar; Ron R Read; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  An avirulent Brachyspira hyodysenteriae strain elicits intestinal IgA and slows down spread of swine dysentery.

Authors:  Maxime Mahu; Filip Boyen; Stefano Canessa; Jackeline Zavala Marchan; Freddy Haesebrouck; An Martel; Frank Pasmans
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  Practical implications of erythromycin resistance gene diversity on surveillance and monitoring of resistance.

Authors:  Jinlyung Choi; Elizabeth L Rieke; Thomas B Moorman; Michelle L Soupir; Heather K Allen; Schuyler D Smith; Adina Howe
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.194

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.