| Literature DB >> 30808302 |
Mattia Pirolo1, Angela Gioffrè2, Daniela Visaggio1, Monica Gherardi3, Grazia Pavia4, Pasquale Samele2, Lucia Ciambrone4, Rossella Di Natale5, Giovanna Spatari5, Francesco Casalinuovo4, Paolo Visca6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colonization by livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) has increasingly been reported in the swine population worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of MRSA nasal carriage in healthy pigs, including the black (Calabrese) breed, from farms in the Calabria Region (Southern Italy). Between January and March 2018, a total of 475 healthy pigs reared in 32 farms were sampled by nasal swabbing. MRSA isolates were characterized by spa, MLST and SCCmec typing, and susceptibility testing to 17 antimicrobials.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial susceptibility; Genotyping; LA-MRSA; Pigs; Southern Italy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30808302 PMCID: PMC6390553 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1422-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Characteristics of pig farms
| Farm ID | Province | Breeding type | No. of farmed pigs | No. of sampled pigs (including black pigs) | No. of antibiotic-treated among sampled pigsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 275 | 12 (0) | 3 |
| 02CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 380 | 10 (1) | 6 |
| 03CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 300 | 10 (0) | 8 |
| 04CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 20 | 14 (0) | 0 |
| 05CS | Cosenza | Intensive | 3967 | 29 (0) | 0 |
| 06CS | Cosenza | Non-intensive | 60 | 6 (6) | 0 |
| 07KR | Crotone | Intensive | 2309 | 19 (2) | 2 |
| 08CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 1010 | 18 (0) | 0 |
| 09CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 10 | 8 (0) | 1 |
| 10RC | Reggio Calabria | Intensive | 341 | 18 (0) | 0 |
| 11RC | Reggio Calabria | Intensive | 158 | 13 (0) | 13 |
| 12RC | Reggio Calabria | Non-intensive | 99 | 10 (10) | 0 |
| 13CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 50 | 15 (0) | 0 |
| 14CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 20 | 12 (0) | 0 |
| 15CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 120 | 15 (0) | 0 |
| 16CS | Cosenza | Non-intensive | 170 | 17 (17) | 0 |
| 17CS | Cosenza | Non-intensive | 1207 | 11 (11) | 0 |
| 18CS | Cosenza | Intensive | 600 | 10 (0) | 0 |
| 19RC | Reggio Calabria | Intensive | 124 | 20 (0) | 0 |
| 20RC | Reggio Calabria | Non-intensive | 150 | 15 (15) | 0 |
| 21RC | Reggio Calabria | Intensive | 330 | 16 (0) | 0 |
| 22CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 850 | 30 (0) | 0 |
| 23CZ | Catanzaro | Intensive | 400 | 20 (0) | 20 |
| 24KR | Crotone | Intensive | 144 | 20 (0) | 0 |
| 25KR | Crotone | Intensive | 300 | 14 (0) | 0 |
| 26VV | Vibo Valentia | Intensive | 132 | 23 (3) | 0 |
| 27VV | Vibo Valentia | Non-intensive | 24 | 10 (10) | 0 |
| 28VV | Vibo Valentia | Intensive | 10 | 9 (1) | 0 |
| 29RC | Reggio Calabria | Intensive | 765 | 20 (0) | 7 |
| 30RC | Reggio Calabria | Non-intensive | 32 | 2 (2) | 0 |
| 31RC | Reggio Calabria | Intensive | 1101 | 20 (0) | 0 |
| 32RC | Reggio Calabria | Intensive | 50 | 9 (0) | 0 |
aOngoing or suspended in the last twenty days
Prevalence of S. aureus according to breeding type, breed and antimicrobial treatment
| Variable | Category | No. of farms | No. of sampled animals | MRSA-positive | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. (%) | No. (%) | ||||||
| Breeding type | Intensive | 25 | 405 | 350 (86.4) | NS | 218 (53.8) | > 0.001 |
| Non-intensive | 7 | 70 | 40 (57.1) | 1 (1.4) | |||
| Total | 32 | 475 | 390 (82.1) | 219 (46.1) | |||
| Breed | Black pig | 11a | 77 | 47 (61.0) | NS | 7 (9.1) | > 0.001 |
| Other breeds | 25 | 398 | 343 (86.2) | 212 (53.3) | |||
| Total | 32 | 475 | 390 (82.1) | 219 (46.1) | |||
| Antimicrobial treatment | Treatedb | – | 60 | 57 (95.0) | NS | 45 (75.0) | 0.010 |
| Untreated | – | 415 | 333 (80.2) | 174 (41.9) | |||
| Total | – | 475 | 390 (82.1) | 219 (46.1) | |||
aA minority of black pigs were occasionally reared also in 4 intensive farms
bOngoing or suspended in the last twenty days
NS, Not significant
Fig. 1Frequency and distribution of spa types for sampled farms. a Minimum spanning tree based on spa types for all MRSA isolates (n = 219). Each node represents a different spa type. The diameter of node is proportional to the number of the isolates belonging to the spa type. b Distribution of spa types among 32 screened farms
Fig. 2IS256 insertion in the A07 fragment of the SAPIG2195 coding region. a ST398-specific PCR using primers A07f/A07r [30] of different t011 MRSA isolates from farm ID 05CS. Lanes 1 and 2, A07 (197 bp) and A07::IS256 (1535 bp), respectively. Lanes M1 and M2, 1 kb and 100 bp molecular size markers (Promega) respectively. b Schematic of the IS256 element inserted in the A07 fragment of SAPIG2195 [31]. The transposase gene (tnp) is flanked by non-coding regions (NCR-L and NCR–R) that harbor imperfect inverted repeats (IR-L and IR-R). The two octanucleotide direct repeats (DR-L and DR-R) flank the IS256
Resistance to individual antimicrobials in 219 MRSA isolates from pigs
| Antimicrobial target | Antimicrobial class | Antimicrobiala | No. of non-susceptible (R + I) isolates (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peptidoglycan synthesis | β-lactams |
| 219 (100) |
|
| 219 (100) | ||
|
| 145 (66.2) | ||
| Carbapenems |
| 22 (10.0) | |
| Glycopeptides |
| 0 (0) | |
| DNA synthesis | Fluoroquinolones |
| 143 (65.3) |
|
| 105 (47.9) | ||
| Protein synthesis | Aminoglycosides |
| 43 (19.6) |
|
| 47 (21.5) | ||
| Macrolides |
| 101 (46.1) | |
| Lincosamides |
| 204 (93.1) | |
| Tetracyclines |
| 219 (100) | |
| Fucidanes |
| 0 (0) | |
| Phenicols |
| 16 (7.3) | |
| Ansamycins |
| 1 (0.5) | |
| Others | Nitrofuranes |
| 10 (4.6) |
| Folate pathways inhibitors |
| 150 (68.4) |
aAcronyms: PEN, penicillin; OXA, oxacillin; AMS, ampicillin/sulbactam; IMP, imipenem; VAN; vancomicin; ENR, enrofloxacin; MAR, marbofloxacin; GEN, gentamycin; KAN, kanamycin; ERY, erythromycin; CLI, clindamycin; TET, tetracycline; FUS, fusidic acid; CHL, chloramphenicol; RIF, rifampicin; NIT, nitrofurantoin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
bIsolates showing resistance (R) and intermediate susceptibility (I) were classified as non-susceptible
Fig. 3Distribution of epidemiological types (combined spa and SCCmec type) according to the resistance to individual antimicrobial compounds