Literature DB >> 24683042

Native Hawaiian views on biobanking.

Maile Tauali i1, Elise Leimomi Davis, Kathryn L Braun, JoAnn Umilani Tsark, Ngiare Brown, Maui Hudson, Wylie Burke.   

Abstract

Genomic science represents a new frontier for health research and will provide important tools for personalizing health care. Biospecimen-based research is an important mechanism for expanding the genomic research capacity, and indigenous peoples are a target of biospecimen-based research due to their relative isolation and the potential to discover rare or unique genotypes. This study explored Native Hawaiian perceptions of and expectations for biobanking. Ten discussion groups were conducted with Native Hawaiians (N = 92), who first heard a presentation on biobanking. Six themes emerged: (1) biobank governance by the Native Hawaiian community, (2) research transparency, (3) priority of Native Hawaiian health concerns, (4) leadership by Native Hawaiian scientists accountable to community, (5) re-consenting each time specimen is used, and (6) education of Native Hawaiian communities. Considered together, these findings suggest that biobanking should be guided by six principles that comprise "G.R.E.A.T. Research" (Governance, Re-consent, Education, Accountability, Transparency, Research priorities). These recommendations are being shared with biobanking facilities in Hawai'i as they develop protocols for biobanking participation, governance, and education. These findings also inform researchers and indigenous peoples throughout the world who are working on biobanking and genomic research initiatives in their nations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24683042      PMCID: PMC4133296          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0638-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  12 in total

1.  The Havasupai Indian tribe case--lessons for research involving stored biologic samples.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Leslie E Wolf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Building Native Hawaiian capacity in cancer research and programming. A legacy of 'Imi Hale.

Authors:  Kathryn L Braun; Joann U Tsark; LorrieAnn Santos; Nia Aitaoto; Clayton Chong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Interrelationships among native peoples, genetic research, and the landscape: need for further research into ethical, legal, and social issues.

Authors:  Mervyn L Tano
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Native Hawaiian preferences for informed consent and disclosure of results from genetic research.

Authors:  Megan Fong; Kathryn L Braun; R Mei-Ling Chang
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Biospecimen "ownership": counterpoint.

Authors:  Lynn G Dressler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Ethical, legal, and policy issues: dominating the biospecimen discussion.

Authors:  Jimmie B Vaught; Nicole Lockhart; Karen S Thiel; Julie A Schneider
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Views of biobanking research among Alaska native people: the role of community context.

Authors:  Vanessa Hiratsuka; Jennifer Brown; Denise Dillard
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2012

8.  Genetic research in native communities.

Authors:  Lorrieann Santos
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2008

9.  Cultural challenges to biotechnology: Native American genetic resources and the concept of cultural harm.

Authors:  Rebecca Tsosie
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 10.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.944

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.

Authors:  Jaclyn Aramoana; Jonathan Koea
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-03

Review 2.  An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.

Authors:  Jaclyn Aramoana; Jonathan Koea
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 3.  An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.

Authors:  Jaclyn Aramoana; Jonathan Koea
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-03-07

4.  Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Biospecimen Education Among Pacific Islanders in Southern California.

Authors:  Nasya S Tan; Harold Custodio; Mandy LaBreche; Cleo Carlos Fex; Vanessa Tui'one May; Jane Ka'ala Pang; Victor Kaiwi Pang; Lola Sablan-Santos; Tupou Toilolo; Alisi Tulua; Dorothy Schmidt Vaivao; Melanie Sabado-Liwag; James Russell Pike; Bin Xie; Patchareeya P Kwan; Paula Healani Palmer; Sora Park Tanjasiri
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Access and Management: Indigenous Perspectives on Genomic Data Sharing.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Krysta S Barton; Kathryn M Porter; Thyvu Mai; Wylie Burke; Stephanie Russo Carroll
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.006

7.  Views on clinical trial recruitment, biospecimen collection, and cancer research: population science from landscapes of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse).

Authors:  Rodney C Haring; Whitney Ann Henry; Maui Hudson; Elisa M Rodriguez; Maile Taualii
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Jan Domaradzki; Jakub Pawlikowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Prioritizing Approaches to Engage Community Members and Build Trust in Biobanks: A Survey of Attitudes and Opinions of Adults within Outpatient Practices at the University of Maryland.

Authors:  Casey Lynnette Overby; Kristin A Maloney; Tameka DeShawn Alestock; Justin Chavez; David Berman; Reem Maged Sharaf; Tom Fitzgerald; Eun-Young Kim; Kathleen Palmer; Alan R Shuldiner; Braxton D Mitchell
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-07-28

10.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Nila A Sathe; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Maureen E Smith; Melissa L McPheeters; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.