PURPOSE: To evaluate benefits of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for staging accuracy in prostate cancer. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is a preferred staging tool; however, it may underestimate the incidence of nodal involvement. METHODS: Eighty patients with estimated risk of lymphadenopathy above 5 % based on Briganti nomogram had Tc-99m-labeled nanocolloid injected into the prostate. Planar lymphoscintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography/CT were performed to localize SLNs. Radioguided SLN dissection was followed by backup ePLND comprising external iliac, obturator and internal iliac regions. All SLNs were serially sectioned every 150 μm and examined using hematoxylin and eosin; immunohistochemical staining was applied every 300 μm. RESULTS: A total of 335 SLNs were detected, and 17 % were located outside ePLND template. Nodal metastases were diagnosed in 32 patients (40 %). Without radioguided SLN localization, solitary metastases posteriorly to the branches of the internal ilaic vessels, in pararectal and common iliac regions would not have been removed in five of 32 patients (16 %). Using standard histology protocol, we would have diagnosed metastases in 23 patients with median size of 2.8 mm. Serial sectioning of SLN and immunohistochemistry led to the detection of metastases in additional nine patients (28 %) with median size of 0.2 mm. CONCLUSION: ePLND comprised 83 % of SLNs, at least one SLN laid outside its template in 28 % of patients. ePLND and SLN dissection combined with nodal serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry increased the detection rate of nodal metastases by 68 % in comparison with ePLND alone and standard histology protocol.
PURPOSE: To evaluate benefits of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for staging accuracy in prostate cancer. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is a preferred staging tool; however, it may underestimate the incidence of nodal involvement. METHODS: Eighty patients with estimated risk of lymphadenopathy above 5 % based on Briganti nomogram had Tc-99m-labeled nanocolloid injected into the prostate. Planar lymphoscintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography/CT were performed to localize SLNs. Radioguided SLN dissection was followed by backup ePLND comprising external iliac, obturator and internal iliac regions. All SLNs were serially sectioned every 150 μm and examined using hematoxylin and eosin; immunohistochemical staining was applied every 300 μm. RESULTS: A total of 335 SLNs were detected, and 17 % were located outside ePLND template. Nodal metastases were diagnosed in 32 patients (40 %). Without radioguided SLN localization, solitary metastases posteriorly to the branches of the internal ilaic vessels, in pararectal and common iliac regions would not have been removed in five of 32 patients (16 %). Using standard histology protocol, we would have diagnosed metastases in 23 patients with median size of 2.8 mm. Serial sectioning of SLN and immunohistochemistry led to the detection of metastases in additional nine patients (28 %) with median size of 0.2 mm. CONCLUSION: ePLND comprised 83 % of SLNs, at least one SLN laid outside its template in 28 % of patients. ePLND and SLN dissection combined with nodal serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry increased the detection rate of nodal metastases by 68 % in comparison with ePLND alone and standard histology protocol.
Authors: Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Stephan Jeschke; Lukas Lusuardi; Andy Myatt; Stephan Hruby; Christian Pirich; Guenter Janetschek Journal: Urology Date: 2012-09-15 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Henk G van der Poel; Tessa Buckle; Oscar R Brouwer; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Fijs W B van Leeuwen Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Stephan Jeschke; Avi Beri; Martin Grüll; Josef Ziegerhofer; Peter Prammer; Karl Leeb; Wolfgang Sega; Guenter Janetschek Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Firas Abdollah; Maxine Sun; Rodolphe Thuret; Lars Budäus; Claudio Jeldres; Markus Graefen; Alberto Briganti; Paul Perrotte; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Gallina; Andrea Salonia; Giuseppe Zanni; Luc Valiquette; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-02-06 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Martin C Schumacher; Fiona C Burkhard; George N Thalmann; Achim Fleischmann; Urs E Studer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Maaike de Boer; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Jos A A M van Dijck; George F Borm; Paul J van Diest; Eddy M M Adang; Johan W R Nortier; Emiel J T Rutgers; Caroline Seynaeve; Marian B E Menke-Pluymers; Peter Bult; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Friedhelm Wawroschek; Theodor Wagner; Michael Hamm; Dorothea Weckermann; Harry Vogt; Bruno Märkl; Ronald Gordijn; Rolf Harzmann Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alessandro Conti; Matteo Santoni; Luciano Burattini; Marina Scarpelli; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Andrea B Galosi; Liang Cheng; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Rodolfo Montironi Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Osamah Hasan; Alexandra Reed; Mohammed Shahait; Raju Chelluri; David I Lee; Ryan W Dobbs Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 2.266
Authors: Harriet C Thoeny; Sebastiano Barbieri; Johannes M Froehlich; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lluís Fumadó; Jose M Abascal; Antoni Mestre-Fusco; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Guadalupe Aguilar; Nuria Juanpere; Lluís Cecchini Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-09-02
Authors: Gijs H KleinJan; Nynke S van den Berg; Jeroen de Jong; Esther M Wit; Helene Thygessen; Erik Vegt; Henk G van der Poel; Fijs W B van Leeuwen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 9.236