Literature DB >> 24680742

Altered brainstem auditory evoked potentials in a rat central sensitization model are similar to those in migraine.

Xianghong Arakaki1, Gary Galbraith2, Victor Pikov3, Alfred N Fonteh4, Michael G Harrington5.   

Abstract

Migraine symptoms often include auditory discomfort. Nitroglycerin (NTG)-triggered central sensitization (CS) provides a rodent model of migraine, but auditory brainstem pathways have not yet been studied in this example. Our objective was to examine brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in rat CS as a measure of possible auditory abnormalities. We used four subdermal electrodes to record horizontal (h) and vertical (v) dipole channel BAEPs before and after injection of NTG or saline. We measured the peak latencies (PLs), interpeak latencies (IPLs), and amplitudes for detectable waveforms evoked by 8, 16, or 32 kHz auditory stimulation. At 8 kHz stimulation, vertical channel positive PLs of waves 4, 5, and 6 (vP4, vP5, and vP6), and related IPLs from earlier negative or positive peaks (vN1-vP4, vN1-vP5, vN1-vP6; vP3-vP4, vP3-vP6) increased significantly 2h after NTG injection compared to the saline group. However, BAEP peak amplitudes at all frequencies, PLs and IPLs from the horizontal channel at all frequencies, and the vertical channel stimulated at 16 and 32 kHz showed no significant/consistent change. For the first time in the rat CS model, we show that BAEP PLs and IPLs ranging from putative bilateral medial superior olivary nuclei (P4) to the more rostral structures such as the medial geniculate body (P6) were prolonged 2h after NTG administration. These BAEP alterations could reflect changes in neurotransmitters and/or hypoperfusion in the midbrain. The similarity of our results with previous human studies further validates the rodent CS model for future migraine research.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brainstem auditory evoked potential; Migraine; Nitroglycerin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24680742      PMCID: PMC4020271          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  78 in total

Review 1.  Bursting of thalamic neurons and states of vigilance.

Authors:  Rodolfo R Llinás; Mircea Steriade
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Habituation and migraine.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Francesco Pierelli; Jean Schoenen
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Does wave VI of BAEP pertain to the prognosis of coma?

Authors:  A Balogh; C Wedekind; N Klug
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 4.  Central effects of nitroglycerin in the rat: new perspectives in migraine research.

Authors:  C Tassorelli; S A Joseph; G Nappi
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

5.  Brain stem activation in spontaneous human migraine attacks.

Authors:  C Weiller; A May; V Limmroth; M Jüptner; H Kaube; R V Schayck; H H Coenen; H C Diener
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Auditory brainstem response in pediatric migraine: during the attack and asymptomatic period.

Authors:  Yezdan Firat; Orhan Ozturan; Ugur Bicak; Cengiz Yakinci; Mustafa Akarcay
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Differential impact of hypothermia and pentobarbital on brain-stem auditory evoked responses.

Authors:  R Janssen; B E Hetzler; J P Creason; R S Dyer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct

8.  Mechanisms of increased sensitivity to noise and light in migraine headache.

Authors:  A Woodhouse; P D Drummond
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.292

9.  Ictal and interictal phonophobia in migraine-a quantitative controlled study.

Authors:  A Ashkenazi; A Mushtaq; I Yang; M L Oshinsky
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 6.292

10.  Is increased amplitude of contingent negative variation in migraine due to cortical hyperactivity or to reduced habituation?

Authors:  P Kropp; W D Gerber
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.292

View more
  3 in total

1.  Metabolic assessment of a migraine model using relaxation-enhanced 1 H spectroscopy at ultrahigh field.

Authors:  Nastaren Abad; Jens T Rosenberg; Tangi Roussel; Dillon C Grice; Michael G Harrington; Samuel C Grant
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-17       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Brainstem auditory-evoked potential and migraine: is there an association?

Authors:  Min Li; Chunzhi Wang
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Dynamic sodium imaging at ultra-high field reveals progression in a preclinical migraine model.

Authors:  Nastaren Abad; Jens T Rosenberg; David C Hike; Michael G Harrington; Samuel C Grant
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.926

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.