Literature DB >> 24680519

Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes.

Jagadesh C Reddy1, Christopher J Rapuano2, Jacqueline R Cater1, Kunal Suri1, Parveen K Nagra1, Kristin M Hammersmith1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of various parameters measured by dual Scheimpflug imaging technology in differentiating eyes with keratoconus or early keratoconus from normal eyes.
SETTING: Cornea Service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed of the parameters provided by the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to compare the mean values and to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of these parameters.
RESULTS: Many parameters were statistically significantly different between keratoconus and normal eyes compared with early keratoconus eyes (P<.05). Total cornea power-steep and posterior curvature-steep keratometry had the highest area under the curve (AUC) score (0.99) for differentiating keratoconus eyes from normal eyes. All anterior curvature parameters were statistically significant in differentiating keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, whereas only the anterior curvature-steep was statistically significant in differentiating early keratoconus eyes from normal eyes. The central pachymetry and thinnest pachymetry were statistically significant in differentiating keratoconus and early keratoconus eyes from normal eyes. Third-order root mean square (RMS) and total RMS had the highest AUC scores (0.83 and 0.82, respectively) for differentiating early keratoconus eyes from normal eyes.
CONCLUSION: Total corneal power, anterior curvature, posterior curvature, pachymetry, and corneal aberration data generated from the dual Scheimpflug analyzer showed promising results in differentiating keratoconus and early keratoconus eyes from normal eyes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2014 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24680519     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of topographic, tomographic, topometric, densitometric, and aberrometric features of cornea with pentacam HR system in subclinical keratoconus.

Authors:  Haci Hasan Ozkan; Mustafa Koc; Hasan Kiziltoprak; Kemal Tekin; Emre Aydemir
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis.

Authors:  Eric S Hwang; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; Sang Woo Kim; Marcony R Santhiago; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  [Corneal topography and keratoconus diagnostics with Scheimpflug photography].

Authors:  J Bühren
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Correlation between visual function and refractive, topographic, pachymetric and aberrometric data in eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Neslihan Bayraktar Bilen; Ibrahim F Hepsen; Carlos G Arce
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Analysis.

Authors:  Oren Golan; Andre L Piccinini; Eric S Hwang; Ildamaris Montes De Oca Gonzalez; Mark Krauthammer; Sumitra S Khandelwal; David Smadja; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes.

Authors:  Mohammad Naderan; Ali Jahanrad; Mahgol Farjadnia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Characteristic of entire corneal topography and tomography for the detection of sub-clinical keratoconus with Zernike polynomials using Pentacam.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Weibo Li; Jun Jiang; Xiran Zhuang; Wei Chen; Mei Peng; Jianhua Wang; Fan Lu; Meixiao Shen; Yuanyuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A predictive model for early diagnosis of keratoconus.

Authors:  Gracia Castro-Luna; Antonio Pérez-Rueda
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Time Course of Changes in Simulated Keratometry and Total Corneal Refractive Power after Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus.

Authors:  Masahide Takahashi; Kazutaka Kamiya; Yusuke Kono; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparison of Simulated Keratometry and Total Refractive Power for Keratoconus According to the Stage of Amsler-Krumeich Classification.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Yusuke Kono; Masahide Takahashi; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.