Literature DB >> 24680098

Perceived effectiveness of teaching methods for point of care ultrasound.

Rudolph A Cartier1, Carl Skinner2, Brooks Laselle2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a rapidly expanding aspect of both the practice and education of emergency physicians. The most effective methods of teaching these valuable skills have not been explored.
OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to identify those methods that provide the best educational value as determined by the learner.
METHODS: Data was collected from pre- and post-course surveys administered to students of the introductory POCUS course provided to emergency medicine residents each year at our facility. Data were collected in 2010 and 2011. Participants were asked to evaluate the effectiveness of small- vs. large-group format, still images vs. video clips, and PowerPoint slides vs. live demonstration vs. hands-on scanning.
RESULTS: Students felt the most effective methods to be small-group format, video-clip examples, and hands-on scanning sessions. Students also rated hands-on sessions, still images, and video images as more effective in post-course surveys as compared with pre-course surveys.
CONCLUSIONS: The methods perceived as most effective for POCUS education are small-group format, video-clip examples, and hands-on scanning sessions. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emergency ultrasound; point of care ultrasound; residency education; training methods; ultrasound education

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24680098     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  8 in total

1.  Assessing the learning potential of an interactive digital game versus an interactive-style didactic lecture: the continued importance of didactic teaching in medical student education.

Authors:  Jesse Courtier; Emily M Webb; Andrew S Phelps; David M Naeger
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-08-31

2.  Social media to supplement point-of-care ultrasound courses: the "sandwich e-learning" approach. A randomized trial.

Authors:  Dorothea Hempel; Stephanie Haunhorst; Sivajini Sinnathurai; Armin Seibel; Florian Recker; Frank Heringer; Guido Michels; Raoul Breitkreutz
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2016-03-12

3.  Intervention Descriptions in Medical Education: What Can Be Improved? A Systematic Review and Checklist.

Authors:  Jennita G Meinema; Nienke Buwalda; Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin; Mechteld R M Visser; Nynke van Dijk
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Prospective Analysis of Short- and Mid-term Knowledge Retention after a Brief Ultrasound Course for Undergraduate Medical Students.

Authors:  Carlos Augusto M Menegozzo; Priscila Gadelho Cazolari; Fernando da Costa Ferreira Novo; Ramiro Colleoni; Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular torsion: a practical resident curriculum.

Authors:  Leandra Stringer; Sarah Cocco; Alex Jiang; Ernest Pang Chan; Frank Myslik; Gary Brahm; Hassan Razvi; Sumit Dave; Peter Zhan Tao Wang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Locating the mental foramen at the bedside with point of care ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Abdullah Ebrahim Laher; Feroza Motara; Mike Wells
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-01-21

7.  A comparison between the effectiveness of a gamified approach with the conventional approach in point-of-care ultrasonographic training.

Authors:  Aaron Kuo Huo Lai; Abdul Muhaimin Bin Noor Azhar; Aidawati Binti Bustam; Xun Ting Tiong; Hiang Chuan Chan; Rashidi Bin Ahmad; Keng Sheng Chew
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Knowledge and skills required to perform point-of-care ultrasonography in family practice - a modified Delphi study among family physicians in Slovenia.

Authors:  Vesna Homar; Zala Kumse Gale; Mitja Lainscak; Igor Svab
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.