Literature DB >> 24679386

Effectiveness and acceptability of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subgenual cingulate cortex for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.

Marcelo T Berlim1, Alexander McGirr2, Frederique Van den Eynde3, Marcelo P A Fleck4, Peter Giacobbe5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) applied to the subgenual cingulate cortex (SCC) has been recently investigated as a potential treatment for severe and chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Given its invasive and experimental nature, a comprehensive evaluation of its effectiveness and acceptability is of paramount importance. Therefore, we conducted the present systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.
METHODS: We searched the literature for English language prospective clinical trials on DBS of the SCC for TRD from 1999 through December 2012 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and SCOPUS, and performed a random effects exploratory meta-analysis using Event Rates and Hedges׳ g effect sizes.
RESULTS: Data from 4 observational studies were included, totaling 66 subjects with severe and chronic TRD. Twelve-month response and remission rates following DBS treatment were 39.9% (95% CI=28.4% to 52.8%) and 26.3% (95% CI=13% to 45.9%), respectively. Also, depression scores at 12 months post-DBS were significantly reduced (i.e., pooled Hedges׳ g effect size=-1.89 [95% CI=-2.64 to -1.15, p<0.0001]). Also, there was a significant decrease in depression scores between 3 and 6 months (Hedges׳ g=-0.27, p=0.003), but no significant changes from months 6 to 12. Finally, dropout rates at 12 months were 10.8% (95% CI=4.3% to 24.4%). LIMITATIONS: Small number of included studies (most of which were open label), and limited long-term effectiveness data.
CONCLUSIONS: DBS applied to the SCC seems to be associated with relatively large response and remission rates in the short- and medium- to long-term in patients with severe TRD. Also, its maximal antidepressant effects are mostly observed within the first 6 months after device implantation. Nevertheless, these findings are clearly preliminary and future controlled trials should include larger and more representative samples, and focus on the identification of optimal neuroanatomical sites and stimulation parameters.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptability; Deep brain stimulation; Effectiveness; Treatment-resistant depression

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24679386     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  30 in total

1.  Molecular Adaptations to Social Defeat Stress and Induced Depression in Mice.

Authors:  Natalya Bondar; Leonid Bryzgalov; Nikita Ershov; Fedor Gusev; Vasiliy Reshetnikov; Damira Avgustinovich; Mikhail Tenditnik; Evgeny Rogaev; Tatiana Merkulova
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 2.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments.

Authors:  Roumen V Milev; Peter Giacobbe; Sidney H Kennedy; Daniel M Blumberger; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Jonathan Downar; Mandana Modirrousta; Simon Patry; Fidel Vila-Rodriguez; Raymond W Lam; Glenda M MacQueen; Sagar V Parikh; Arun V Ravindran
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  Changes in brain connectivity during a sham-controlled, transcranial magnetic stimulation trial for depression.

Authors:  Stephan F Taylor; S Shaun Ho; Tessa Abagis; Mike Angstadt; Daniel F Maixner; Robert C Welsh; Luis Hernandez-Garcia
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 4.  A systematic review of relations between resting-state functional-MRI and treatment response in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Gabriel S Dichter; Devin Gibbs; Moria J Smoski
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Consistent linear and non-linear responses to invasive electrical brain stimulation across individuals and primate species with implanted electrodes.

Authors:  Ishita Basu; Madeline M Robertson; Britni Crocker; Noam Peled; Kara Farnes; Deborah I Vallejo-Lopez; Helen Deng; Matthew Thombs; Clarissa Martinez-Rubio; Jennifer J Cheng; Eric McDonald; Darin D Dougherty; Emad N Eskandar; Alik S Widge; Angelique C Paulk; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  Adolescent brain development and depression: A case for the importance of connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Sarah D Lichenstein; Timothy Verstynen; Erika E Forbes
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Depression in chronic ketamine users: Sex differences and neural bases.

Authors:  Chiang-Shan R Li; Sheng Zhang; Chia-Chun Hung; Chun-Ming Chen; Jeng-Ren Duann; Ching-Po Lin; Tony Szu-Hsien Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 8.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: an integrative review of preclinical and clinical findings and translational implications.

Authors:  M P Dandekar; A J Fenoy; A F Carvalho; J C Soares; J Quevedo
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 9.  Neuronal correlates of depression.

Authors:  Dipesh Chaudhury; He Liu; Ming-Hu Han
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Targeted neural network interventions for auditory hallucinations: Can TMS inform DBS?

Authors:  Joseph J Taylor; John H Krystal; Deepak C D'Souza; Jason Lee Gerrard; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.