Literature DB >> 24677729

Methodological quality of national guidelines for pediatric inpatient conditions.

Gabrielle Hester1, Katherine Nelson, Sanjay Mahant, Emily Eresuma, Ron Keren, Rajendu Srivastava.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines help inform standardization of care for quality improvement (QI). The Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings network published a prioritization list of inpatient conditions with high prevalence, cost, and variation in resource utilization across children's hospitals. The methodological quality of guidelines for priority conditions is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To rate the methodological quality of national guidelines for 20 priority pediatric inpatient conditions.
DESIGN: We searched sources including PubMed for national guidelines published from 2002 to 2012. Guidelines specific to 1 organism, test or treatment, or institution were excluded. Guidelines were rated by 2 raters using a validated tool (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) with an overall rating on a 7-point scale (7 = the highest). Inter-rater reliability was measured with a weighted kappa coefficient.
RESULTS: Seventeen guidelines met inclusion criteria for 13 conditions; 7 conditions yielded no relevant national guidelines. The highest methodological-quality guidelines were for asthma, tonsillectomy, and bronchiolitis (mean overall rating 7, 6.5, and 6.5, respectively); the lowest were for sickle cell disease (2 guidelines) and dental caries (mean overall rating 4, 3.5, and 3, respectively). The overall weighted kappa was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.87).
CONCLUSIONS: We identified a group of moderate to high methodological-quality national guidelines for priority pediatric inpatient conditions. Hospitals should consider these guidelines to inform QI initiatives.
© 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24677729      PMCID: PMC4043870          DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  35 in total

Review 1.  Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  F A Cluzeau; P Littlejohns; J M Grimshaw; G Feder; S E Moran
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  S H Woolf; R Grol; A Hutchinson; M Eccles; J Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-20

3.  Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature.

Authors:  T M Shaneyfelt; M F Mayo-Smith; J Rothwangl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998.

Authors:  Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin Eccles; Ruth Thomas; Graeme MacLennan; Craig Ramsay; Cynthia Fraser; Luke Vale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

Review 6.  A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit.

Authors:  Joan Vlayen; Bert Aertgeerts; Karin Hannes; Walter Sermeus; Dirk Ramaekers
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Quality of evidence-based pediatric guidelines.

Authors:  Nicole Boluyt; Carsten R Lincke; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Clinical practice guideline: Otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  Richard M Rosenfeld; Larry Culpepper; Karen J Doyle; Kenneth M Grundfast; Alejandro Hoberman; Margaret A Kenna; Allan S Lieberthal; Martin Mahoney; Richard A Wahl; Charles R Woods; Barbara Yawn
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study.

Authors:  R Grol; J Dalhuijsen; S Thomas; C Veld; G Rutten; H Mokkink
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.