PURPOSE: Previous work has evaluated the quality of different analytic methods for extracting relaxation times from magnitude imaging data exhibiting Rician noise. However, biexponential analysis of relaxation in tissue, including cartilage, and materials is of increasing interest. We, therefore, analyzed biexponential transverse relaxation decay in the presence of Rician noise and assessed the accuracy and precision of several approaches to determining component fractions and apparent transverse relaxation times. THEORY AND METHODS: Comparisons of four different voxel-by-voxel fitting methods were performed using Monte Carlo simulations, and phantom and ex vivo bovine nasal cartilage (BNC) experiments. In each case, preclinical and clinical imaging field strengths of 7 Tesla (T) and 3T, respectively, and parameters, were investigated across a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Results were compared with Cramér-Rao lower bound calculations. RESULTS: As expected, at high SNR, all methods performed well. At lower SNR, fits explicitly incorporating the analytic form of the Rician noise maintained performance. The much more efficient correction scheme of Gudbjartsson and Patz performed almost as well in many cases. Ex vivo experiments on phantoms and BNC were consistent with simulation results. CONCLUSION: Explicit incorporation of Rician noise greatly improves accuracy and precision in the analysis of biexponential transverse decay data.
PURPOSE: Previous work has evaluated the quality of different analytic methods for extracting relaxation times from magnitude imaging data exhibiting Rician noise. However, biexponential analysis of relaxation in tissue, including cartilage, and materials is of increasing interest. We, therefore, analyzed biexponential transverse relaxation decay in the presence of Rician noise and assessed the accuracy and precision of several approaches to determining component fractions and apparent transverse relaxation times. THEORY AND METHODS: Comparisons of four different voxel-by-voxel fitting methods were performed using Monte Carlo simulations, and phantom and ex vivo bovinenasal cartilage (BNC) experiments. In each case, preclinical and clinical imaging field strengths of 7 Tesla (T) and 3T, respectively, and parameters, were investigated across a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Results were compared with Cramér-Rao lower bound calculations. RESULTS: As expected, at high SNR, all methods performed well. At lower SNR, fits explicitly incorporating the analytic form of the Rician noise maintained performance. The much more efficient correction scheme of Gudbjartsson and Patz performed almost as well in many cases. Ex vivo experiments on phantoms and BNC were consistent with simulation results. CONCLUSION: Explicit incorporation of Rician noise greatly improves accuracy and precision in the analysis of biexponential transverse decay data.
Authors: Chloe Hutton; Andreas Bork; Oliver Josephs; Ralf Deichmann; John Ashburner; Robert Turner Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Vladimir Juras; Sebastian Apprich; Štefan Zbýň; Lukas Zak; Xeni Deligianni; Pavol Szomolanyi; Oliver Bieri; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Beth G Ashinsky; Mustapha Bouhrara; Christopher E Coletta; Benoit Lehallier; Kenneth L Urish; Ping-Chang Lin; Ilya G Goldberg; Richard G Spencer Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; Diana Y Lee; Abinand C Rejimon; Christopher M Bergeron; Richard G Spencer Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2018-08-18 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; Jean-Marie Bonny; Beth G Ashinsky; Michael C Maring; Richard G Spencer Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Hyungseok Jang; Alan B McMillan; Yajun Ma; Saeed Jerban; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du; Richard Kijowski Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; David A Reiter; Hasan Celik; Kenneth W Fishbein; Richard Kijowski; Richard G Spencer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 4.668