Literature DB >> 24677109

Corneal biomechanical properties at different corneal cross-linking (CXL) irradiances.

Arthur Hammer1, Olivier Richoz, Samuel Arba Mosquera, David Tabibian, Florence Hoogewoud, Farhad Hafezi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: New corneal cross-linking (CXL) devices are capable of using higher UV-A light irradiances than used in original CXL protocols. The Bunsen-Roscoe law states that a photochemical reaction should stay constant if the delivered total energy is kept constant; however, little clinical data are available to support this hypothesis.
METHODS: We investigated the biomechanical properties of four groups (n = 50 each) of porcine corneas. Three groups were exposed to riboflavin 0.1 % and UV-A irradiation of equal total energy (3 mW/cm(2) for 30 minutes, 9 mW/cm(2) for 10 minutes, and 18 mW/cm(2) for 5 minutes). Controls were exposed to riboflavin 0.1% without irradiation. Young's modulus of 5-mm wide corneal strips was used as an indicator of corneal stiffness.
RESULTS: We observed a decreased stiffening effect with increasing UV-A intensity. Young's modulus at 10% strain showed significant differences between 3 mW/cm(2) and 9 mW/cm(2) (P = 0.002), 3 mW/cm(2) and 18 mW/cm(2) (P = 0.0002), 3 mW/cm(2) and the control group (P < 0.0001), and 9 mW/cm(2) and the control group (P = 0.015). There was no difference between 18 mW/cm(2) and the control group (P = 0.064) and between 9 mW/cm(2) and 18 mW/cm(2) (P = 0.503).
CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical effect of CXL decreased significantly when using high irradiance/short irradiation time settings. Intrastromal oxygen diffusion capacity and increased oxygen consumption associated with higher irradiances may be a limiting factor leading to reduced treatment efficiency. Our results regarding the efficiency of high-irradiance collagen cross-linking (CXL) raise concerns about the clinical efficiency of the new high-irradiance CXL devices already used in clinical practice without proper validation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; corneal cross-linking; efficiency; high irradiance; oxygen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24677109     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  48 in total

1.  The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Miraftab; Hassan Hashemi; Mohammad Abdollahi; Shekoufeh Nikfar; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Corneal crosslinking (CXL) with 18-mW/cm2 irradiance and 5.4-J/cm2 radiant exposure-early postoperative safety.

Authors:  Isaak Fischinger; Theo G Seiler; Karthiga Santhirasegaram; Moritz Pettenkofer; Chris P Lohmann; Daniel Zapp
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Mechanical outcome of accelerated corneal crosslinking evaluated by Brillouin microscopy.

Authors:  Joshua N Webb; Johnny P Su; Giuliano Scarcelli
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus: an intrapatient comparative study.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi; Bahram Einollahi; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Danial Roshandel; Hamidreza Hasani; Mehrdad Nazeri
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Biomechanical Impact of Localized Corneal Cross-linking Beyond the Irradiated Treatment Area.

Authors:  Joshua N Webb; Erin Langille; Farhad Hafezi; J Bradley Randleman; Giuliano Scarcelli
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Prospective 2-year study of accelerated pulsed transepithelial corneal crosslinking outcomes for Keratoconus.

Authors:  Mohammed Ziaei; Hans Vellara; Akilesh Gokul; Dipika Patel; Charles N J McGhee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Accelerated, Pulsed Collagen Cross-Linking versus the Dresden Protocol in Keratoconus: A Case Series.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dervenis; Panagiotis Dervenis; Nikolaos Dragoumis; Andreas Papandroudis; Zachos Zachariadis; Miltos Balidis
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 10.  Corneal Cross-Linking for Pediatric Keratcoconus Review.

Authors:  Claudia Perez-Straziota; Ronald N Gaster; Yaron S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.