Literature DB >> 24676013

[Adequacy process of prenatal care according to the criteria of humanizing of prenatal care and childbirth program and stork network].

Katrini Guidolini Martinelli1, Edson Theodoro Dos Santos Neto1, Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama2, Adauto Emmerich Oliveira1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the adequacy of the process of prenatal care according to the parameters of the Program for the Humanization of Prenatal Care (PHPN) and of the procedures provided by the Stork Network of Unified Health System (SUS) in the microregion of Espirito Santo state, Brazil.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012-2013 by interviewing and analyzing the records of 742 women during the postpartum period and of their newborns in 7 hospitals in the region chosen for the research. The information was collected, processed and analyzed by the χ² and Fisher's exact test to determine the difference in proportion between the criteria adopted by the PHPN and the Stork Network and the place of residence, family income and type of coverage of prenatal service. The level of significance was set at 5%.
RESULTS: The parameters showing the lowest adequacy rate were quick tests and repeated exams, with frequencies around 10 and 30%, respectively, in addition to educational activities (57.9%) and tetanus immunization (58.7%). In contrast, risk management (92.6%) and the fasting plasma glucose test (91.3%) showed the best results. Adequacy was 7.4% for the PHPN, 0.4% for the Stork Network, with respect to the parameters of normal risk pregnancies, and 0 for high risk pregnancies. There was a significant difference between puerperae according to housing location regarding the execution of serology for syphilis (VDRL), anti-HIV and repeated fasting glucose tests, and monthly income influenced the execution of blood type/Rh factor tests, VDRL, hematocrit and anti-HIV test.
CONCLUSION: Prenatal care in the SUS proved to be inadequate regarding the procedures required by the PHPN and Stork Network in the micro-region of a state in southeastern Brazil, especially for women of lower income, PACS users and residents of rural areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24676013     DOI: 10.1590/s0100-72032014000200003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet        ISSN: 0100-7203


  7 in total

1.  [High-risk clusters and temporal trends in congenital syphilis infection in Brazil].

Authors:  Vinícius da Silva Oliveira; Roberta Luiza Rodrigues; Vinícius Barros Chaves; Thiago Soares Dos Santos; Flaviane Marques de Assis; Yves Mauro Fernandes Ternes; Érika Carvalho de Aquino
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2020-08-06

2.  Prenatal evaluation in primary care in Northeast Brazil: factors associated with its adequacy.

Authors:  Esther Pereira da Silva; Antônio Flaudiano Bem Leite; Roberto Teixeira Lima; Mônica Maria Osório
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.106

3.  Process and outcome of prenatal care according to the primary care models: a cohort study.

Authors:  Renata Leite Alves de Oliveira; Anna Paula Ferrari; Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima Parada
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2019-07-18

4.  Access to public health services and integral care for women during the puerperal gravid period period in Ceará, Brazil.

Authors:  Maria de Fátima Vasques Monteiro; Caio Parente Barbosa; Maria Auxiliadora Figueredo Vertamatti; Maria Nizete Alves Tavares; Amanda Cordeiro de Oliveira Carvalho; Ana Paula Agostinho Alencar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Antenatal care as a risk factor for caesarean section: a case study in Brazil.

Authors:  Márcia Regina Cangiani Fabbro; Monika Wernet; Nayara Girardi Baraldi; Jamile Claro de Castro Bussadori; Natália Rejane Salim; Bernardino Geraldo Alves Souto; Andréa Dos Reis Fermiano
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium: establishment, data harmonization and basic characteristics.

Authors:  Thaís Rangel Bousquet Carrilho; Dayana Rodrigues Farias; Mônica Araújo Batalha; Nathalia Cristina Freitas Costa; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Michael E Reichenheim; Eric O Ohuma; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Gilberto Kac
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evolution of the quality of prenatal care in the primary network of Brazil from 2012 to 2018: What can (and should) improve?

Authors:  Elaine Tomasi; Thales Moura de Assis; Paulo Guilherme Muller; Denise Silva da Silveira; Rosália Garcia Neves; Everton Fantinel; Elaine Thumé; Luiz Augusto Facchini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.