| Literature DB >> 24675717 |
Melanie Meersch1, Christoph Schmidt1, Hugo Van Aken1, Sven Martens2, Jan Rossaint1, Kai Singbartl3, Dennis Görlich4, John A Kellum5, Alexander Zarbock1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Difficulties in prediction and early identification of (acute kidney injury) AKI have hindered the ability to develop preventive and therapeutic measures for this syndrome. We tested the hypothesis that a urine test measuring insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2), both inducers of G1 cell cycle arrest, a key mechanism implicated in acute kidney injury (AKI), could predict AKI in cardiac surgery patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24675717 PMCID: PMC3968141 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram.
Clinical characteristics of subjects (n = 50).
| Total (n = 50) | AKI (n = 26) | Non AKI (n = 24) | p-value | |
| Age | 71±12 | 70±12 | 72±11 | 0.534 |
| Gender | 0.616 | |||
| Male [%] | 33 (66) | 18 (69.2) | 15 (62.5) | |
| Female [%] | 17 (34) | 8 (30.8) | 9 (37.5) | |
| Preoperative creatinine [mg/dl] | 1.33±0.3 | 1.37±0.4 | 1.28±0.21 | 0.695 |
| eGFR [ml/min per 1.73 m2] | 51±11 | 50±14 | 53.8±12 | 0.494 |
| Comorbidities | ||||
| Hypertension [%] | 48 (96) | 24 (92.3) | 24 (100) | 0.166 |
| Congestive Heart Failure [%] | 46 (92) | 24 (92.3) | 22 (91.7) | 0.933 |
| Diabetes [%] | 20 (40) | 12 (46.2) | 8 (33.3) | 0.355 |
| COPD [%] | 15 (30) | 12 (46.2) | 3 (12.5) | 0.009 |
| Chronic kidney disease [%] | 15 (30) | 11 (42.3) | 4 (16.7) | 0.048 |
| Previous heart surgery [%] | 6 (12) | 6 (23.1) | 0 (0) | 0.023 |
| Left ventricular EF<35% [%] | 12 (22) | 8 (30.8) | 3 (12.5) | 0.119 |
| CPB time [minutes] | 140±60 | 149±74 | 129±38 | 0.818 |
| X-clamp [minutes] | 98±50 | 110±63 | 85±26 | 0.358 |
| APACHE on day one | 10±5 | 12±5 | 8±3 | 0.001 |
| Length of ICU stay [days] | 8±2 | 12±3 | 4±1 | 0.001 |
| Length of hospital stay [days] | 19±2 | 24±3 | 14±1 | 0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± s.e. or number (percentage).
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EF, ejection fraction; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; APACHE, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation; ICU, intensive care unit; p≤0.05 significant.
Number and reasons of AKI.
| Number | Reason for AKI | ||
| Increased creatinine | Oliguria | ||
| AKIN stage 1 | 19 | 9 | 10 |
| AKIN stage 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| AKIN stage 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Figure 2Analysis of urine [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7].
(A) Graph shows mean urine [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] concentrations at various time points before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. (B) Graph shows urine [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] corrected for urine creatinine excretion. (C) Graph shows mean urine NGAL concentrations at various time points before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Error bars are SE. Asterisks (*) denote significant differences (p≤0.05) between groups (AKI, non-AKI) at the respective time point.
Figure 3ROC curves for the maximum early composite and the 4
(A) This figure displays the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the maximum early composite (maximum value from the first 24 postoperative hours) for [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7]. (B) This figure displays the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the 4 h values of [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] (black solid line) and NGAL (gray dashed line).
[TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] test characteristics at different cutoff values.
| Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | |
| Composite time | ||||
| 0.3 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.88 |
| 0.4 | 0.92 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| 0.5 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.90 |
| 0.6 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| 0.7 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| 4 h | ||||
| 0.3 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.83 |
| 0.4 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.68 |
| 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.65 |
| 0.6 | 0.46 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.61 |
| 0.7 | 0.46 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.63 |
| 12 h | ||||
| 0.3 | 0.85 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.75 |
| 0.4 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 0.5 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.69 |
| 0.6 | 0.58 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.67 |
| 0.7 | 0.54 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.65 |
| 24 h | ||||
| 0.3 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
| 0.4 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.64 |
| 0.5 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.65 |
| 0.6 | 0.42 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.58 |
| 0.7 | 0.27 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 0.55 |
* composite time: maximum urinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] concentration ((ng/ml)2/1000) achieved in the first 24 hours following surgery; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
Figure 4ROC curve for recovery from AKI after cardiac surgery.
This figure displays the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting renal recovery. [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] (black solid line) and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL, gray dashed line).
Logistic Regression Risk Models for [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] and Clinical Covariates.
| Reference Risk Model | New Risk Model (addition of [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] to reference risk model) | |||
| Variable | Odds ratio | p-value | Odds ratio | p-value |
|
| 1.12 (0.15–8.61) | 0.92 | 3.60 (0.10–128.42) | 0.48 |
|
| 1.74 (1.23–2.69) | 0.01 | 2.62 (1.04–6.57) | 0.04 |
|
| 10.05 (0.67–150.72) | 0.09 | 18.76 (0.16–2143.76) | 0.02 |
|
| 0.06 (0.01–3.074) | 0.16 | 0.02 (0–120.37) | 0.36 |
|
| 1.01 (0.99–1.04) | 0.30 | 0.99 (0.97–1.03) | 0.77 |
|
| 40.28 (2.2–737.82) | 0.01 | 30.49 (0.81–1146.64) | 0.07 |
|
| Not included in model | 1.72 (1.02–2.91) | 0.04 | |
[TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] was log10 transformed.
Odds ratio for [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] is modeled for change of 0.1 unit in log10 units.
95%-confidence interval given in brackets.
Adding [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] improves the model significantly (p = 0.001, likelihood ratio test).
Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and category-free net reclassification improvement (cfNRI) for [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7].
| Statistic | Value | p-value | 95%-CI |
|
| 0.207 | 0.0015 | (0.079–0.336) |
|
| 1.513 | <0.001 | (1.122–1.905) |
|
| 0.910 | <0.001 | (0.82–0.99) |
|
| 0.967 | <0.001 | (0.92–1.00) |
|
| 0.907 | <0.001 | (0.80–1.00) |
IDI and cfNRI refer to the improved classification of patient using the reference model and the new model (reference model+[TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7]). AUC refers to the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve calculated from the model prediction against the outcome (AKI vs. no AKI). AUC difference refers to the ROC analysis using the difference between predicted probabilities for each patient. AUCs have been calculated in SPSS. IDI and cfNRI have been calculated in R using package PredictABEL. P-values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for IDI and cfNRI are provided by the function reclassification and are determined by a z-score transformation.