Literature DB >> 24675200

In vitro and in vivo investigation of the influence of implant surface on the formation of bacterial biofilm in mammary implants.

Anita Jacombs1, Shamaila Tahir, Honghua Hu, Anand K Deva, Ahmad Almatroudi, William Louis Fick Wessels, David A Bradshaw, Karen Vickery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture remains the most common complication following breast augmentation surgery, and evidence suggests that bacterial biofilm on the implant surface is responsible. The authors investigated whether the interaction of bacterial biofilm with implants independently determines progression to capsule formation. They also studied the rate of bacterial growth and adhesion to implants.
METHODS: Sixteen adult female pigs had 121 breast implants inserted. Sixty-six implants-23 smooth and 43 textured-were inoculated with a human strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis and received no other treatment. After an average period of 19 weeks, Baker grading was performed and implants were retrieved. For the in vitro study, samples underwent both quantitative bacterial analysis and imaging using confocal laser scanning and scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: At explantation, there was no significant difference (p = 1.0) in the presence of capsular contracture (Baker grade III and IV) between smooth (83 percent) and textured implants (84 percent). Biofilm was confirmed on 60 of the 66 capsules. Capsules from smooth and textured implants had the same number of infecting bacteria (textured: 3.01 × 10 bacteria/g; smooth: 3.00 × 10 bacteria/g). In vitro, the surface of textured implants showed 11-, 43-, and 72-fold more bacteria at 2, 6, and 24 hours, respectively, compared with smooth implants (p < 0.001). These findings were confirmed by imaging analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that textured implants develop a significantly higher load of bacterial biofilm in comparison with smooth implants. Furthermore, in vivo, once a threshold of biofilm forms on either smooth or textured implant surfaces, there seems to be an equal propensity to progress to capsular contracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24675200     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  34 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Treatment of Capsular Contracture (CC): Literature Review and Outcomes Utilizing Implants in Revisionary Surgery.

Authors:  Nicola Zingaretti; Paolo Vittorini; Valentina Savino; Jacopo Claudio Vittorini; Francesco De Francesco; Michele Riccio; Pier Camillo Parodi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Nima Khavanin; Mark W Clemens; Andrea L Pusic; Neil A Fine; Jennifer B Hamill; H Myra Kim; Ji Qi; Edwin G Wilkins; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Whole exome sequencing reveals activating JAK1 and STAT3 mutations in breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Piers Blombery; Ella R Thompson; Kate Jones; Gisela Mir Arnau; Stephen Lade; John F Markham; Jason Li; Anand Deva; Ricky W Johnstone; Amit Khot; H Miles Prince; David Westerman
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Finding Consensus After Two Decades of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Mark W Clemens; Ryan C DeCoster; Berry Fairchild; Alexander A Bessonov; Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Advising patients about breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Christopher S Parham; Summer E Hanson; Charles E Butler; M Bradley Calobrace; Raylene Hollrah; Terri Macgregor; Mark W Clemens
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

6.  Histologic, Molecular, and Clinical Evaluation of Explanted Breast Prostheses, Capsules, and Acellular Dermal Matrices for Bacteria.

Authors:  Louis Poppler; Justin Cohen; Utku Can Dolen; Andrew E Schriefer; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Corey Deeken; Richard A Chole; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 7.  Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  P Rastogi; A K Deva; H Miles Prince
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 8.  The Relationship of Bacterial Biofilms and Capsular Contracture in Breast Implants.

Authors:  Dragana Ajdic; Yasmina Zoghbi; David Gerth; Zubin J Panthaki; Seth Thaller
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.283

9.  Biofilms and effective porosity of hernia mesh: are they silent assassins?

Authors:  A S W Jacombs; A Karatassas; B Klosterhalfen; K Richter; P Patiniott; C Hensman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Safety and Efficacy of Smooth Surface Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Berry Fairchild; Warren Ellsworth; Jesse C Selber; David P Bogue; Dmitry Zavlin; Stephanie Nemir; Cristina M Checka; Mark W Clemens
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.