P Rastogi1, A K Deva1, H Miles Prince2,3. 1. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Maxillofacial Surgery - Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Medical Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Epworth Healthcare, 140 Clarendon Street, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia. miles.prince@petermac.org. 3. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. miles.prince@petermac.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a recently recognised malignancy of T lymphocytes exclusively associated with textured breast implants. This review aims to evaluate existing theories regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical evaluation and management of the disease. RECENT FINDINGS: The true incidence of BIA-ALCL is difficult to define. Prevailing pathogenic theories recognise the interplay between textured implants, Gram-negative bacteria, host genetics (e.g. JAK/STAT, p53) and time. Patients typically present with a delayed seroma and less commonly with a capsular mass or systemic disease at an average of 8-10 years after implantation. BIA-ALCL staging has evolved from a "liquid tumour" model to a "solid tumour" classification. For localised disease, surgery involving complete capsulectomy and implant removal is the cornerstone of treatment. For more advanced disease, treatment includes surgery followed by chemotherapy (combination anthracycline-based), radiotherapy and the antibody drug conjugate (brentuximab vedotin). The interplay between the Gram-negative biofilm, implant texturing, genetic mutations and time has been implicated in pathogenesis of BIA-ALCL. The identification of a putative infectious cause is not unique to lymphomagenesis. Future research, investigating BIA-ALCL genetic mutations and immunological modulation with Gram-negative biofilm in BIA-ALCL models is warranted.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a recently recognised malignancy of T lymphocytes exclusively associated with textured breast implants. This review aims to evaluate existing theories regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical evaluation and management of the disease. RECENT FINDINGS: The true incidence of BIA-ALCL is difficult to define. Prevailing pathogenic theories recognise the interplay between textured implants, Gram-negative bacteria, host genetics (e.g. JAK/STAT, p53) and time. Patients typically present with a delayed seroma and less commonly with a capsular mass or systemic disease at an average of 8-10 years after implantation. BIA-ALCL staging has evolved from a "liquid tumour" model to a "solid tumour" classification. For localised disease, surgery involving complete capsulectomy and implant removal is the cornerstone of treatment. For more advanced disease, treatment includes surgery followed by chemotherapy (combination anthracycline-based), radiotherapy and the antibody drug conjugate (brentuximab vedotin). The interplay between the Gram-negative biofilm, implant texturing, genetic mutations and time has been implicated in pathogenesis of BIA-ALCL. The identification of a putative infectious cause is not unique to lymphomagenesis. Future research, investigating BIA-ALCL genetic mutations and immunological modulation with Gram-negative biofilm in BIA-ALCL models is warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma; Bacteria; Biofilm; Breast implant; Capsulectomy; T cell
Authors: Sizhi Paul Gao; Kevin G Mark; Kenneth Leslie; William Pao; Noriko Motoi; William L Gerald; William D Travis; William Bornmann; Darren Veach; Bayard Clarkson; Jacqueline F Bromberg Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Melissa G Lechner; Carolina Megiel; Connor H Church; Trevor E Angell; Sarah M Russell; Rikki B Sevell; Julie K Jang; Garry S Brody; Alan L Epstein Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Mintsje de Boer; Flora E van Leeuwen; Michael Hauptmann; Lucy I H Overbeek; Jan Paul de Boer; Nathalie J Hijmering; Arthur Sernee; Caroline A H Klazen; Marc B I Lobbes; René R W J van der Hulst; Hinne A Rakhorst; Daphne de Jong Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ricardo Garcia Pastorello; Felipe D'Almeida Costa; Cynthia A B T Osório; Fabiana B A Makdissi; Stephania Martins Bezerra; Marina de Brot; Antonio Hugo J F M Campos; Fernando Augusto Soares; José Vassallo Journal: Diagn Pathol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 2.644
Authors: Shafreena Kühn; Mara Anna Georgijewitsch; Andrej Wehle; Moritz Billner; Lara Küenzlen; Jens Rothenberger; Ulrich Michael Rieger Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 2.268
Authors: Evan Matros; Meghana G Shamsunder; Robyn N Rubenstein; Thais O Polanco; Colleen M McCarthy; Jonas A Nelson; Karol Gutowski; The Tops Steering Committee Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-03-18