E Paige Stout1, Michael Y Choi, Januario E Castro, Tadeusz F Molinski. 1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, ‡Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, §Moores Cancer Center, and ⊥School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego , 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0358, United States.
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common lymphoid neoplasia in Western societies and is currently incurable. Multiple treatment options are practiced, but the available small molecule drugs suffer from dose-limiting toxicity and undesirable side effects. The need for new, less toxic treatments is a pressing concern. Here, we demonstrate that (-)-agelastatin A (1a), a pyrrole-imidazole alkaloid obtained from a marine sponge, exhibits potent in vitro activity against primary cell lines of CLL and disclose the synthesis of several analogues that are equipotent or exceed the potency of the natural product. The novel synthetic analogue, 13-debromo-13-trifluoromethyl agelastatin A (1j), showed higher activity than the natural product when tested against the same cell lines and is the most potent agelastatin derivative reported to date. A detailed in vitro structure-activity relationship of 1a in CLL compared to that of 22 synthetic analogues is described along with preliminary in vivo pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies on the most potent compounds.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common lymphoid neoplasia in Western societies and is currently incurable. Multiple treatment options are practiced, but the available small molecule drugs suffer from dose-limiting toxicity and undesirable side effects. The need for new, less toxic treatments is a pressing concern. Here, we demonstrate that (-)-agelastatin A (1a), a pyrrole-imidazole alkaloid obtained from a marine sponge, exhibits potent in vitro activity against primary cell lines of CLL and disclose the synthesis of several analogues that are equipotent or exceed the potency of the natural product. The novel synthetic analogue, 13-debromo-13-trifluoromethyl agelastatin A (1j), showed higher activity than the natural product when tested against the same cell lines and is the most potent agelastatin derivative reported to date. A detailed in vitro structure-activity relationship of 1a in CLL compared to that of 22 synthetic analogues is described along with preliminary in vivo pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies on the most potent compounds.
Leukemia and lymphoma
account for approximately 9% of new cancer cases diagnosed in the
United States each year.[1] Chronic lymphocytic
leukemia (CLL), the most common lymphoid neoplasia, progresses rapidly
in two-thirds of diagnosed patients with a relatively poor prognosis.
It remains an “incurable disease.”[2] Current treatments of CLL include immunotherapeutic[3] and chemotherapeutic approaches. Chemotherapy
treatments for CLL employ the nitrogen mustards bendamustine, chlorambucil,
cyclophosphamide, and the nucleoside analogue fludarabine (Figure 1). Adverse side effects of these agents include
nausea, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, immunosuppression, and myelotoxicity.
The growing number of patients with resistant or relapsed disease
with current treatments[4] presses for the
development of new chemotherapeutic agents for CLL.
Figure 1
Structures of FDA approved
CLL treatments.
Structures of FDA approved
CLL treatments.Agelastatins A and B
(1a,b) are potent cytotoxic natural products
isolated from the marine sponges Agelas dendromorpha and Cymbastela sp.[5] Agelastatins,
including the analogues agelastatins C (2a) and D (2b),[5c] are members of the chemically
diverse pyrrole-imidazole alkaloids (PIA).[6] Since Weinreb’s ground-breaking total synthesis of (±)-1a,[7] several additional syntheses,
both of the racemic compound (±)-1a[8a−8c] and the natural antipode (−)-1a,[8d,8e] have been achieved.[8f] Compound 1a has been shown to inhibit the growth of in vitro cultured
KB nasopharyngeal tumor cells (IC50 0.5–1 μg
mL–1), suppress osteopontin-mediated malignant transformation
by β-catenin inhibition,[9] and inhibit
the expression of glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3b).[10] In a preliminary disclosure,[11] we showed that 1a exhibits p53-independent submicromolar
activity against CLL (EC50 60–100 nM). An early
study of structure–activity relationships (SAR) of 1a by Pietra and colleagues[5a,5b] concluded that structural
modifications of the OH and NH groups in rings B–D of the parent
molecule were not tolerated, but more recent work by Li reveals that
certain substitutions in the pyrrolecarboxamide moiety (ring A) of 1a retain activity.[12] Here, we
disclose expanded SAR mapping and pharmacokinetic (PK) and metabolism
studies of 1a that define the most potent analogues of
the agelastatin family reported to date with a predictive analysis
for more potent analogues with improved PK properties.
Results
Chemistry
Natural products (−)-agelastatins A (1a), C,
and D (2a,b) were isolated in our laboratory
from the Western Australian sponge Cymbastela sp.
as described elsewhere.[5c] Compounds 1b, 1p, and 4a,b, respectively,
were derived from natural or synthetic (−)-1a by
simple chemical reactions according to previously described protocols
(Scheme 1). Debromo-agelastatin A (1p), a key starting material for ring A substitution reactions, was
first prepared by Pietra and co-workers by conjugate reduction–elimination
of 1a (LiAlH4 and THF, 60%). In our hands,
an improved yield of 1p could be realized by the hydrogenolysis
of 1a (H2, Pd–C, Et3N, and
MeOH, 75–90%). The new analogues 1d–1p (Figure 2) were all obtained utilizing
known or modified reaction conditions. Agelastatin analogues 1c and 1f–1o represent novel
compounds. Attempted synthesis of 1d–1f under conventional chlorination reaction conditions (N-chlorosuccinimide, CH3CN) failed to deliver product.
Free radical electrophilic aromatic substitution of 1p (N-chlorosuccinimide, (BzO)2, and CCl4)[13] also failed, most likely due
to the limited solubility of 1p in the solvent. Optimized
conditions, using an alternative radical-substitution protocol (N-chlorosuccinimide, K2S2O8, and H2O, 1 h, 80 °C) compatible with aqueous solvent,
led to clean consumption of starting material and production of the
chlorinated analogues 1d–1f as the
only observed products that were readily separated by HPLC. Radical-trifluoromethylation
was attempted under the conditions of MacMillan[14] but gave only a mixture of uncharacterized decomposition
products. In contrast, trifluoromethylation and difluoromethylation
of 1p following the protocol of Baran and co-workers[15] (BuOOH, aqueous
NaSO2CF3, or ZnSO2CHF2, respectively) smoothly converted the starting material to the fluorinated
analogues 1j–1l and 1m, respectively. Attempted difluoroethylation of 1p using
similar conditions (BuOOH, aqueous NaSO2CF2CH3) was unavoidably accompanied
by hydrolysis giving the 13-acetyl derivative 1q.[16]
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Agelastatins 1b, 1n–p, and 4a,b
*, based on recovered starting
material. Compounds 1a,b,p and 4a were earlier reported by Pietra and coworkers.[5b] Compound 4b, the product of the
transacetalization of 1a with MeOH, has been named agelastatin
E by Mourabit and co-workers.[24]
Figure 2
Structures of natural agelastatins (1a,b and 2a,b), ent-(+)-agelastatin
A (3), and synthetic agelastatins (1c–q and 4(5)).
Synthesis of Agelastatins 1b, 1n–p, and 4a,b
*, based on recovered starting
material. Compounds 1a,b,p and 4a were earlier reported by Pietra and coworkers.[5b] Compound 4b, the product of the
transacetalization of 1a with MeOH, has been named agelastatin
E by Mourabit and co-workers.[24]Structures of natural agelastatins (1a,b and 2a,b), ent-(+)-agelastatin
A (3), and synthetic agelastatins (1c–q and 4(5)).
Activities against CLL Patient and ATCC Leukemia
Cell Lines
Agelastatins 1–4 were screened in assays against primary leukemia cells obtained
from patients with CLL (CLL1–CLL6) obtained through the CLL
Research Consortium, in addition to the immortalized leukemic JVM-2
cell line (Tables 1–3). Because of the usual variability of primary
patientCLL cells, HeLa was used as a comparative standard cell line.
Several modified agelastatins showed nanomolar activity against patientCLL cells, and 1j exhibited slightly higher potency than
the natural product agelastatin A (1a) (CLL2 EC50 values 0.064 ± 0.01 μM and 0.16 ± 0.01 μM,
respectively, Table 1). Any chemical modifications
outside of the pyrrole ring (e.g., N- and O-methylation of 1a to 4a,b; Table 3) resulted in significant
losses in activity, consistent with previously reported SAR data.[5]
Table 1
Antitumor Activity
of Natural and Synthetic Agelastatins 1a–1p with Modifications on the Pyrrole Ring
in vitro
cytotoxicity EC50 (μM)b
cmpd
Xa
Y
CLL1c
CLL2c
JVM-2d
HeLa
1a
Br
H
0.31
0.16
0.28
0.11
1b
Br
Br
26.3
4.46
3.53
3.61
1c
H
Br
19.4
9.22
71.5
9.07
1d
Cl
H
0.95
0.32
0.20
0.63
1e
Cl
Cl
1.56
0.52
0.28
0.60
1f
H
Cl
35.9
6.05
5.33
5.16
1g
I
H
5.96
0.73
2.62
1.18
1h
I
I
26.4
96e
49.0
262f
1i
H
I
25.5
94.9g
222h
0.061
1j
CF3
H
0.43
0.064
0.66
0.15
1k
CF3
CF3
−i
19.2j
41k
153
1l
H
CF3
45.1
4.68
22.8
19.6
1m
CHF2
H
13.0
5.44
4.66
4.01
1n
CN
H
11.1
0.71
38.0
3.40
1o
Br
I
211
48.2
161.9l
86.7
1p
H
H
541
3.90
120
61.5
Flum
17.1n
2.66
10.4
16.0
See Figure 2 for the substituent key.
Standard error (SE) is ±0.01 μM for
all data points unless otherwise noted.
CLL1 and CLL2 = CLL patient cell lines.
JVM-2 = ATCC leukemia cell line.
SE ± 2 μM.
SE ± 1 μM.
SE ± 0.2 μM.
SE ± 1 μM.
NT = not tested.
SE ± 0.1 μM.
SE ± 2 μM.
SE ± 0.2 μM.
Flu = fludarabine; see Figure 1 for the chemical structure.
Flu EC50 values >10 μM are considered Flu-resistant
CLL strains.
Table 3
Antitumor Activity of Natural Agelastatins
(2a,b) and Synthetic Analogues (3 and 4) against CLL and HeLA Tumor Cell Lines
antitumor
EC50 (μM)a
cmpd
CLL1
CLL2
JVM-2
HeLa
2a
84.6
10.0
4.07
7.63
2b
91.1
29.0
13.2
13.7
3
−b
>1c
−b
−b
4a
140
47.7
55.7
59.0
4b
867
28.8
429
91.4
4c
−b
9.39
21.1
−b
Flud
17.1e
2.66
10.4
16.0
Standard error is ±0.01 μM for all data points.
NT = not tested.
Compound 3 was sample limited
and only tested up to 1 μM.
Flu = fludarabine; see Figure 1 for the
chemical structure.
Flu
EC50 values >10 μM are considered Flu-resistant
CLL strains.
See Figure 2 for the substituent key.Standard error (SE) is ±0.01 μM for
all data points unless otherwise noted.CLL1 and CLL2 = CLLpatient cell lines.JVM-2 = ATCC leukemia cell line.SE ± 2 μM.SE ± 1 μM.SE ± 0.2 μM.SE ± 1 μM.NT = not tested.SE ± 0.1 μM.SE ± 2 μM.SE ± 0.2 μM.Flu = fludarabine; see Figure 1 for the chemical structure.Flu EC50 values >10 μM are considered Flu-resistant
CLL strains.See Figure 2 for the substituent
key.Standard error is ±0.01
μM for all data points.CLL3–CLL6 = CLLpatient cell lines.Flu = fludarabine; see Figure 1 for the chemical structure.Standard error is ±0.01 μM for all data points.NT = not tested.Compound 3 was sample limited
and only tested up to 1 μM.Flu = fludarabine; see Figure 1 for the
chemical structure.Flu
EC50 values >10 μM are considered Flu-resistant
CLL strains.Modifications
on the pyrrole ring of agelastatin A and activity in models of primary
brain tumors and CNS penetration have been recently reported;[12] however, in the present context of CLL, we have
expanded the inventory of analogues and showed important influences
of substituent electronegativity and size at C-13 (Scheme 2). Moving an electronegative halogen or CF3 group from C-13 to C-14 consistently abrogated activity (CLL2 EC50 = 0.16 ± 0.01 μM for 1a compared
with 9.22 ± 0.01 μM for 1c; Table 1), while reductive removal of Br from C-13 (13-debromo-agelastatin
A, 1p) also resulted in significant loss (25-fold) of
activity. Interpretation of these collective data supports the importance
of an electronegative functional group at position C-13 for CLL activity.
The 13,14-dichloro analogue 1e only showed a slight decrease
in potency when compared to the 13-monochloro derivative 1d (EC50 = 0.52 ± 0.01 μM and 0.32 ± 0.01
μM, respectively; Table 1). However,
other 13,14-dihalogenated and 13,14-di-CF3 compounds showed
a much larger loss in potency when compared to that of their respective
13-monosubstituted analogues (e.g., pairwise comparisons of 1a and 1b; 1g and 1h; and 1j and 1k). Interestingly, the difluoromethyl
analogue 1m displayed a significant loss of activity
when compared to that of the trifluoromethyl derivative 1j (CLL2 EC50 = 5.44 ± 0.01 μM and 0.064 ±
0.01 μM, respectively, Table 1). The
CHF2 group, a lipophilic hydrogen bond donor,[15b] appears to induce an unfavorable interaction
when located at C-13.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Pyrrole-Modified Agelastatins 1d–1m
Compounds 1d and e were independently reported
by Li and coworkers.[12]
Synthesis of Pyrrole-Modified Agelastatins 1d–1m
Compounds 1d and e were independently reported
by Li and coworkers.[12]Stereochemistry was also shown to play an essential role in CLL
activity. Of the two enantiomers of 1a (Table 3), only the natural antipode (−)-1a exhibited nanomolar activity (EC50 110–310 nM);
unnatural ent-agelastatin A (+)-3 is
essentially inactive (EC50 >1000 nM), suggesting chiral
constraints at the cognate binding site of the natural product, perhaps
underscoring the importance of the 3D disposition of NH and OH H–bond
donor–acceptors in the structure of (−)-1a.
Stability in Mouse and Human Plasma
Nonspecific protein
binding of 1a and 1j was relatively low.
Compounds 1a and 1j were recovered in 65–90%
yields from both mouse plasma and human serum after 24 h of incubation
(Figures 3 and S29, Supporting
Information). Experimentally measured physical properties of 1a and 1j, including water solubility and log P (Table 4) suggest that 1a and 1j are appreciably stable but possibly rapidly
excreted by glomerular filtration, which limits the achievable t1/2 in serum and plasma.
Figure 3
Stability of (a) agelastatin
A [(−)-1a] in mouse plasma and serum and (b) 1a and 13-debromo-13-trifluoromethyl-agelastatin A [(−)-1j] in human AB serum (n = 3, error bars
indicate standard error). Concentrations of (−)-1a and 1j were determined by LCMS.
Table 4
Measured and Calculated Physical Properties of 1a and 1j
property
1a
1j
solubility (H2O)a
0.64 mg/mL
0.30 mg/mL
log Pa
0.18
0.78
Measured at 25 °C.
Stability of (a) agelastatin
A [(−)-1a] in mouse plasma and serum and (b) 1a and 13-debromo-13-trifluoromethyl-agelastatin A [(−)-1j] in human AB serum (n = 3, error bars
indicate standard error). Concentrations of (−)-1a and 1j were determined by LCMS.Measured at 25 °C.
In Vivo Studies in Mice: Pharmacokinetic
Properties of 1a and 1j
Agelastatin
A (1a) was administered as a single dose (2.5 mg/kg)
to female BALB/c mice under both intravenous (IV) and intraperitoneal
(IP) routes (Figure 4) and monitored by time-dependent
plasma levels. Initial plasma uptake of 1a was much greater
with IV administration; however, other pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters
(Table 5) favored IP administration. Consequently,
subsequent PK studies were performed using IP administration. Comparing
administrations of 1a and 1j to mice at
a single dose (2.5 or 5.0 mg/kg, Figure 5),
the area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax significantly favored 1j over 1a, while
the half-lives (t1/2) of the two compounds
(Table 6) were similar. The improved PK properties
of 1j may be due to the more favorable log P value when compared to those of 1a.
Figure 4
Plasma concentration–time
curves for (−)-agelastatin A [(−)-1a] after
a single 2.5 mg/kg dose using both IV and IP administration routes.
Concentrations of (−)-1a were determined by LCMS.
Table 5
Pharmacokinetic Parameters
of Agelastatin A (1a) Based on a Single 2.5 mg/kg Dose,
Intravenous (IV) or Intraperitoneal (IP)
administration route
PK parameter
intravenous (IV)
intraperitoneal (IP)
AUCa
1742
2946
Cmaxb
4.50 μM
1.65 μM
Tmaxc
2 min
30 min
t1/2d
4 min
1 h
AUC = area under
the curve.
Cmax = maximum compound concentration.
Tmax = time at which Cmax occurs.
t1/2 = compound half-life. PK parameters
were calculated in GraphPad Prism software.
Figure 5
Plasma concentration–time curves for (−)-agelastatin
A (1a) and 13-debromo-13-trifluoromethyl-agelastatin
(1j) after a single (a) 2.5 or (b) 5.0 mg/kg dose (n = 4, error bars indicate standard error). Concentrations
of (−)-1a and 1j were determined
by LCMS.
Table 6
Pharmacokinetic Parameters
of 1a and 1ja
2.5 mg/kg dose
5.0 mg/kg dose
PK parameterb
1a
1j
1a
1j
AUC
6260
12 925
4294
6508
Cmax
1.28 μM
4.18 μM
2.30 μm
3.25 μM
Tmax
30 min
15 min
30 min
30 min
t1/2
1.4 h
1.2 h
1 h
45 min
Parameters calculated from LCMS analysis of time-course
monitoring of blood samples after single 2.5 or 5.0 mg/kg IP dose.
See caption in Table 4 for the key.
Plasma concentration–time
curves for (−)-agelastatin A [(−)-1a] after
a single 2.5 mg/kg dose using both IV and IP administration routes.
Concentrations of (−)-1a were determined by LCMS.AUC = area under
the curve.Cmax = maximum compound concentration.Tmax = time at which Cmax occurs.t1/2 = compound half-life. PK parameters
were calculated in GraphPad Prism software.Plasma concentration–time curves for (−)-agelastatin
A (1a) and 13-debromo-13-trifluoromethyl-agelastatin
(1j) after a single (a) 2.5 or (b) 5.0 mg/kg dose (n = 4, error bars indicate standard error). Concentrations
of (−)-1a and 1j were determined
by LCMS.Parameters calculated from LCMS analysis of time-course
monitoring of blood samples after single 2.5 or 5.0 mg/kg IP dose.See caption in Table 4 for the key.
Phase I/II Metabolism Model: Agelastatin A Analogues
Mouse
and human microsomes were separately incubated with 1a or 1j and monitored for metabolism by cytochrome P450
enzymes. After 1 h of incubation with microsomal fractions, quantitative
recovery (LCMS) of both 1a and 1j from samples
of the supernatant was achieved under conditions that metabolized
the positive control, 7-ethoxycoumarin[17] (Supporting Information, Figure S30).
Under similar conditions, debromoagelastatin A (1p) was
incubated with a near quantitative recovery, suggesting the metabolic
stability of the 4-ring system of the agelastatins. Select phase II
metabolism of 1a was briefly explored using both mouse
and human S9 fractions. No formation of glucoronides was detected
after the incubation of 1a with glucuronidase,[18] an observation that militates against the involvement
of phase II pathways in the clearance of 1a.Collectively,
these data suggest that 1a and analogues are not competent
substrates for Cyp oxidative modification or glucuronidation. Although
we cannot at this time exclude sulfation of the tertiary OH group
or direct excretion through other routes (feces or bile), some evidence
was obtained for urinary excretion. Treatment of mice with 1a (2.5 mg/kg, IP), followed by collection and single-drop urinalysis
(5 min) and analysis revealed a 217 μM concentration of only
unmetabolized 1a compared to that of the control (Supporting Information, Figure S31). These data
are consistent with rapid excretion of 1a in mice through
glomerular filtration, although follow-up studies are warranted to
fully understand the total metabolism–excretion of 1a.
Discussion and Conclusions
Five synthetic analogues
(1d, 1e, 1g, 1j, and 1n) exhibited nanomolar in vitro activity against
CLLpatient cells, with comparable potency to the natural product
(−)-agelastatin A (1a). Only substitutions on
the pyrrole ring at C-13 were tolerated, suggesting a very narrow
SAR window for this class of compounds. The remarkable activity of
trifluoromethyl analogue 1j suggests that an electron-withdrawing
group at C-13 is desirable and that similarly sized isosteres of the
Br substituent found in natural 1a may be tolerated.
The Hammett σmeta constants[19] for Br, CHF2, and CF3 are 0.39, 0.29, and
0.43,[20a] respectively, while Taft steric
constants −ES are 1.16, 1.91, and
2.40,[20b] respectively (Table 7). Comparisons of cytotoxic activities (Table 1–3) suggest that an electron-withdrawing
group is required at C-13 for potent activity and that groups as large
as CF3 (comparable to i-Pr) are tolerated.
We predict analogues that subscribe to these criteria may also be
expected to exhibit significant activity.[21] The chlorinated analogues 1d and e were
also recently reported by Li and co-workers;[12] however, the present work expands the repertoire of active agelastatins
and presents the first examples of halogenated agelastatins substituted
by CF3 and I.
Table 7
Selected Hammett
and Taft Parameters for Agelastatin Analogue Substituents
group
σmetaa
–Esb
CH3
–0.07
1.24
CH(CH3)2
1.71
CH2F
0.12
1.48
CHF2
0.29
1.91
CF3
0.43
2.40
Cl
0.37
0.97
Br
0.39
1.16
I
0.35
From ref (20a).
From ref (20b). See ref (20c) for a modified scale
of −ES values.
From ref (20a).From ref (20b). See ref (20c) for a modified scale
of −ES values.Compounds 1a and 1j exhibit in vitro stability in mouse and human plasma, but
time course measurements reveal rapid clearance of both compounds
from the blood, most likely due to efficient excretion; a phenomenon
that may be related to their relatively low log P values (0.18 and 0.78, respectively; Table 4). Future efforts will focus on expanding a wider window of SAR through
the synthesis of additional C-13-substituted agelastatin analogues
that subscribe to predictive steric and electron-withdrawing effects,
while aiming to improve PK properties, particularly log P, and retention of high potency.
Experimental
Section
General Procedures
Reagent-grade chemicals were used
as purchased. Dry CH3CN and DMF were dried by passage through
double dry alumina cartridges and molecular sieves, respectively,
under an atmosphere of Ar. 1H and 2D NMR spectra were acquired
using a Bruker spectrometer equipped with a 1.7 mm {13C,15N}1H microcryoprobe operating at 600 MHz; a Jeol
spectrometer equipped with a 2 channel 1H,19F{15N,31P} inverse-detect probe operating at
500 MHz (1H) or 470 MHz (19F); or a Varian XSens 13C{1H}cryoprobe probe operating at 125 MHz spectrometer. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were acquired in CD3OD and referenced to δ 3.31 and 49.0 ppm, respectively. CD
spectra were measured on samples in 0.2 cm quartz cells recorded with
a Jasco 810 spectropolarimeter at 23 °C. IR spectra were obtained
using a Jasco FT-IR-4100 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a ZnSe ATR
plate. High-resolution mass spectra were recorded using an Agilent
6230 TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an Agilent 1200 microflow
HPLC. Semipreparative and preparative HPLC separations were carried
out using a dual-pump instrument equipped with a high-dynamic range
UV–vis detector set to λ 280 nm. All solvents used for
HPLC purification were redistilled in glass from commercial HPLC grade
solvents. Retention times (tR) are reported
in minutes. Low-resolution LCMS analyses were conducted with a Thermo-Finnigan
Accela-MSQ instrument operating in ESI mode with a Phenomenex Kinetex
C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 2.6 μm), using gradient
mobile phases of aqueous CH3CN with 0.1% formic acid at
0.7 mL min–1. All compounds used in biological assays
were analyzed by LCMS and conformed to purities of ≥95%.
(−)-Agelastatin A (1a)
Natural (−)-agelastatin
A used in the present study was isolated from the Australian sponge Cymbastela sp. collected in Western Australia as previously
described.[5c] Enantiopure synthetic (−)-1a, received as a generous gift from Professor Justin Du Bois
(Stanford University),[22] was repurified
by reversed-phase HPLC prior to use (Luna phenyl–hexyl, 250
× 10 mm, 5 μm; linear gradient from 20–40% aqueous
CH3CN over 20 min, 2.5 mL min–1) to afford
(−)-1a (>99% ee) and the minor byproduct 1c. NMR and MS data for (−)-1a matched
previously reported data.[5]1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.91 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (dt, J = 12, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (d, J = 5.5 Hz,
1H), 3.88 (s, 1H), 2.81 (s, 3H), 2.65 (dd, J = 13,
6.4 Hz, 1H), 2.10 (t, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H) ppm.
(−)-Agelastatin
B (1b)
N-Bromosuccinimide (NBS,
5.0 mg, 28 μmoL, 1.1 equiv) was added in one portion to a stirred
solution of (−)-agelastatin A (1a, 9.1 mg, 27
μmoL, 1 equiv), and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine
(8.3 mg, 41 μmoL, 1.5 equiv) in water (0.5 mL) and THF (1.0
mL) at 0 °C. After 2 h, the reaction was quenched by the addition
of a mixture of Na2S2O3 (satd, aq)
and NaHCO3 (satd, aq) solution (1:1, 100 μL). The
aqueous solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue
purified by preparatory reversed-phase HPLC (Duragel C18, 20 × 50 mm, 5 μm; linear gradient from 10–40%
aqueous CH3CN over 25 min, 10 mL min–1), to yield pure (−)-agelastatin B (1b, 10.7
mg, 94%) as a white solid with NMR and MS spectra that matched previously
reported data.[5a]1H NMR (500
MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.97 (s, 1H), 4.60 (dt, J = 12.2, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.88
(s, 1H), 2.81 (s, 3H), 2.68 (dd, J = 13.1, 6.4 Hz,
1H), 2.12 (app-t, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H) ppm of HRTOFMS
[M – H]−m/z 416.9209 (calcd for C12H11N4O3Br2, 416.9203).
13-Debromo-14-bromo-agelastatin
A (1c)
Compound 1c was isolated
as a minor product from the repurification of synthetic (−)-agelastatin
A (1a). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD)
δ 7.10 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (dt, J = 11.5, 5.9
Hz, 1H), 4.01 (dd, J = 5.3, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (s, 3H), 2.64 (dd, J = 13.4, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (dd, J = 13.4, 10 Hz, 1H)
ppm. HRTOFMS [M – H]−m/z 339.0100 (calcd for C12H12N4O3Br, 339.0098).
13-Debromo-13-chloro-agelastatin
A (1d).[23]
N-Chlorosuccinimide (NCS, 5.0 mg, 38 μmoL, 2 equiv)
and debromo-agelastatin A (1p, 5.0 mg, 19 μmoL,
1 equiv) were dissolved in water (0.38 mL, N2 degassed),
and the mixture treated with a solution of potassium persulfate (0.31
mg, 0.6 equiv) in degassed H2O. The heterogeneous mixture
was heated to 80 °C with vigorous stirring for 60 min. The mixture
was allowed to cool to rt and was quenched with aqueous NaHSO3 (50 μL of a 10% w/v solution), followed by neutralization
with aqueous K2HPO4 (pH 9.5). The mixture was
diluted with H2O (1 mL) and extracted with n-BuOH (1.5 mL). The organics were concentrated under reduced pressure,
and the residue purified by semipreparative reversed-phase HPLC (Luna
phenyl–hexyl, 250 × 10 mm, 5 μm; linear gradient
from 15–30% aqueous CH3CN over 20 min, 2.5 mL min–1), to yield 1d (tR = 17 min, 2.2 mg, 39%), 1f (tR = 20 min, 1.4 mg, 25%), and 1e (tR = 27 min, 2.0 mg, 31%) as white solids. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.90 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H),
4.63 (dt, J = 12, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (d, J
= 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (s, 1H), 2.80 (s, 3H), 2.64 (dd, J = 13, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (app-t, J = 12.6
Hz, 1H) ppm. HRTOFMS [M – H]−m/z 295.0604 (calcd for C12H12N4O3Cl, 295.0603).
To a solution of debromo-agelastatin
A (1p, 2.0 mg, 7.6 μmoL, 1 equiv) and zinc difluoromethanesulfinate
(DFMS, 4.5 mg, 15 μmoL, 2 equiv) in water (50 μL) was
very slowly added tert-butylhydroperoxide (70% solution
in water, 3.14 μL in 50 μL of H2O, 3 equiv)
with vigorous stirring. The reaction was allowed to stir at rt for
20 h, and then second portions of DFMS (2 equiv) and BuOOH (3 equiv) were added. The reaction was allowed
to stir for an additional 24 h, then quenched with sodium bicarbonate
(50 μL). The organics were concentrated, and the crude mixture
purified by analytical reversed-phase HPLC (Luna C18, 250
× 4.6 mm, 5 μm; linear gradient from 15–40% aqueous
CH3CN over 15 min, 0.7 mL min–1), to
yield 1m (0.7 mg, 29%) as a white powder. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.94 (dd, J = 53, 53 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 6.54
(m, 1H), 4.73 (m, 1H), 4.10 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H),
3.88 (s, 1H), 2.79 (s, 3H), 2.70 (dd, J = 12.9, 6.3
Hz, 1H), 2.21 (app-t, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H) ppm. 19F NMR (470 MHz, CD3OD) δ −112.2 (dd, J = 309, 55 Hz), −114.7 (dd, J = 308, 53 Hz) ppm. HRTOFMS [M – H]−m/z 311.0958 (calcd for C13H13N4O3F2, 311.0961).
13-Debromo-13-cyano-agelastatin
A (1n)
A flame-dried vial was charged with 1a (5 mg, 15 μmoL, 1 equiv), Zn(CN)2 (1.4
mg, 12 μmoL, 0.8 equiv), and Pd(PPh3)4 (1.7 mg, 1.5 μmoL, 0.1 equiv), and purged with Ar. DMF (0.2
mL) was added, and the solution was allowed to stir at 95 °C
for 24 h under Ar. The reaction was quenched with K2CO3 (10 μL satd aq), diluted with H2O (0.5 mL),
and extracted with n-BuOH (2 × 0.5 mL). The
crude organics were concentrated and purified by semipreparative reversed-phase
HPLC (Luna phenyl–hexyl, 250 × 10 mm, 5 μm; linear
gradient from 20–45% aqueous CH3CN over 20 min,
2.5 mL min–1) to yield 1n (tR = 10 min, 0.6 mg, 24% based on recovered starting
material) and 1a (tR = 14
min) as white solids. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD)
δ 6.94 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (dt, J = 12, 6.3
Hz, 1H), 4.16 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 1H),
2.82 (s, 3H), 2.71 (dd, J = 13.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.27
(dd, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H) ppm. HRTOFMS [M – H]−m/z 286.0947 (calcd
for C13H12N5O3, 286.0946).
14-Iodo-agelastatin A (1o)
N-Iodosuccinimide (NIS, 12 mg, 52 μmoL, 2 equiv) and agelastatin
A (1a, 9.0 mg, 26.4 μmoL, 1 equiv) were dissolved
in dry DMF (0.2 mL) and stirred at rt for 24 h. An additional 2 equiv
of NIS was added, and the reaction was allowed to continue for an
additional 24 h. The reaction was then quenched with K2CO3 (50 μL satd aq), and the crude mixture purified
by preparative reversed-phase HPLC (Duragel C18, 50 ×
20 mm, 5 μm; linear gradient from 25–50% aqueous CH3CN over 20 min, 10 mL min–1), to yield 1o (11.4 mg, 92%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (500
MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.01 (s, 1H), 4.60 (dt, J = 12, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 3.85
(s, 1H), 2.78 (s, 3H), 2.65 (dd, J = 13, 6.3 Hz,
1H), 2.09 (app-t, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H) ppm. HRTOFMS [M
– H]−m/z 464.9068 (calcd for C12H11N4O3BrI, 464.9065).
13-Debromo-agelastatin A (1p)[5b]
A vial containing Pd–C
(10%) (63 μg, 0.58 μmoL, 0.1 equiv) and a solution of 1a (10 mg, 29.3 μmoL, 1 equiv) and dry triethylamine
(16.4 μL, 0.117 mmol, 4 equiv) in MeOH (0.5 mL) was purged with
H2 and the contents stirred at rt under H2 (1
atm) for 45 min. The reaction mixture was then passed through a 0.45
μm syringe filter, and after the removal of the volatiles, the
residue was purified by preparatory reversed-phase HPLC (Duragel C18, 50 × 20 mm, 5 μm; isocratic 1:9 CH3CN/H2O, 10 mL min–1) to yield 13-debromo-agelastatin
A (1p) as a white solid (7.2 mg, 90%), identical to that
reported by Pietra and co-workers.[5b]1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.03 (dd, J = 3.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (m, 1H), 6.24 (m, 1H), 4.66 (dt, J = 11.5, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (d, J = 5.0
Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 1H), 2.80 (s, 3H), 2.62 (dd, J = 13.4, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.28 (app-t, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H)
ppm. HRTOFMS [M – H]−m/z 261.0996 (calcd for C12H13N4O3, 261.0993).
13-Debromo-13-acetyl-agelastatin
A (1q)
To a solution of debromo-agelastatin
A (1p, 1.5 mg, 5.7 μmoL, 1 equiv) and sodium difluoroethanesulfinate
(DFES, 2.6 mg, 17.2 μmoL, 3 equiv) in H2O (100 μL)
was very slowly added tert-butylhydroperoxide (70%
solution in water, 3.9 μL in 50 μL of H2O,
5 equiv) with vigorous stirring. The reaction was allowed to stir
at rt for 12 h and the mixture purified directly by analytical reversed-phase
HPLC (Luna C18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; linear gradient
from 15–40% aqueous CH3CN over 15 min, 0.7 mL min–1) to yield 1q (1.0 mg, 58%) as a white
powder. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.13
(dd, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (dt, J = 11.9, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.02
(d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (s, 1H), 2.86 (s, 3H),
2.78 (dd, J = 12.9, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 2.49 (s, 3H), 2.12
(app-t, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR
(600 MHz, CD3OD, determined through HSQC and HMBC experiments)
191.4, 161.1, 160.8, 132.5, 128.2, 119.9, 113.7, 94.5, 67.1, 61.7,
54.4, 39.8, 27.3, 24.1 ppm. HRTOFMS [M + H]+m/z 305.1247 (calcd for C14H17N4O4, 305.1244).
Resolution of (±)-Agelastatin
A
Chiral phase HPLC resolution of synthetic (±)-agelastatin
A 1a(8b) (a generous gift from
Professor Daniel Romo, Texas A&M University) was achieved using
a Phenomenex Lux Cellulose-2 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm)
under isocratic conditions (9:1 CH3CN–i-PrOH and 0.1% Et2NH, 1 mL min–1). Natural
(−)-agelastatin A (1a) eluted first (tR = 19 min), followed by (+)-agelastatin A (3, tR = 29 min). Enantiomeric purity was
verified using CD spectroscopy (see Supporting
Information, Figure S1).
N,N,O-Trimethyl-agelastatin A (4a)
The title compound was prepared according to the method
of Pietra.[5b] Powdered KOH (12 mg) was added
to a stirred solution of (−)-1a (1.0 mg, 2.9 μmoL,
1 equiv) in DMSO (0.1 mL). After 10 min, excess iodomethane (9 μL,
50 equiv) was added, and the mixture stirred for an additional 30
min. The mixture was diluted with H2O (1 mL), neutralized
with satd NaH2PO4 (aq), and loaded onto a solvent
prewashed reversed-phase cartridge (C18, 0.2 g/3 mL) equilibrated
with H2O, then eluted with H2O (3 × 3 mL),
followed by MeOH (3 × 3 mL). The methanol eluate was concentrated
under reduced pressure to provide 4a as a colorless amorphous
solid (0.85 mg, 76%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD)
δ 6.89 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.68 (dt, J = 11.9, 5.9
Hz, 1H), 4.30 (s, 1H), 4.24 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H),
3.18 (s, 3H), 3.14 (s, 3H), 2.98 (s, 3H), 2.81 (s, 3H), 2.68 (dd, J = 12.7, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 2.13 (app-t, J = 12.7 Hz, 1H) ppm. HRTOFMS [M – H]−m/z 383.0712 (calcd for C15H20N4O3Br, 383.0713).
O-Methyl-agelastatin A (4b)
A solution of (−)-1a (4.5 mg, 13.2 μmoL, 1 equiv) in MeOH (0.4 mL) was
stirred with Amberlyst-15 resin for 18 h at 60 °C. The mixture
was cooled to rt, filtered, and the filtrate concentrated and purified
by semipreparative reversed-phase HPLC (Luna phenyl–hexyl,
250 × 10 mm, 5 μm; linear gradient from 20–60% aqueous
CH3CN over 20 min, 2.5 mL min–1) to yield 4b(5b) (3.5 mg, 74%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.91 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H),
4.62 (dt, J = 11.7, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (s, 1H), 3.18 (s, 3H), 2.77 (s, 3H),
2.66 (dd, J = 13.1, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 2.14 (app-t, J = 12.7 Hz, 1H) ppm. HRTOFMS [M – H]−m/z 355.0404 (calcd for C13H16N4O3Br, 355.0400).
O-(2′-Methoxyethyl)-agelastatin A (4c)
A solution of (−)-1a (1.0
mg, 2.9 μmoL, 1 equiv) in 2-methoxyethanol (1 mL, distilled
over 4 Å molecular sieves) was stirred with Dowex 50W-X8 (200–400
mesh, H+ form, prewashed with 1 M HCl, rinsed with distilled
H2O, and dried) at 65 °C for 3 h under N2, then overnight at rt. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate
concentrated to yield 4c (1.0 mg, 85%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.92 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H),
4.62 (dt, J = 12.1, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (s, 1H), 3.56 (dt, J = 5.6, 3.2 Hz, 2H), 3.51 (dt, J = 10.2, 3.8 Hz, 1H),
3.39 (m, 1H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 2.80 (s, 3H), 2.68 (dd, J = 13.0, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (app-t, J = 13.1 Hz, 1H)
ppm. HRTOFMS [M + Na]+m/z 421.0483 (calcd for C15H19N4O4BrNa, 421.0482).
In Vitro CLL and HeLa Cell Line Assays
Primary leukemia cells from patients with CLL were obtained through
the CLL Research Consortium. Institutional review board approval was
obtained from the University of California, San Diego, and informed
consent was obtained prior to the procurement of patient samples in
accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Primary CLL cells or
nonadherent cell lines (JVM-2) were cultured in RPMI (Cellgro, 10-040)
with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, 10099-141) and designated concentration
of test compounds 1–4. Following
culture for 48 h (37 °C, 5% CO2), viability was determined
by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of mitochondrial
membrane potential using 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide
(DiOC6) (Invitrogen/D-273) and cell membrane permeability to propidium
iodide (PI) (Invitrogen, P1304MP). Cells were incubated with 40 nM
DiOC6 and 10 μg/mL PI for 30 min at 37 °C and analyzed
using a FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). Fluorescence
was recorded at 525 nm (FL-1) for DiOC6 and at 600 nm (FL-3) for PI.
Relative viability was determined by calculating the percentage of
the DiOC6 positive/PI negative population relative to an untreated
or vehicle-treated control.Viability of the adherent HeLa cell
line was assayed by the MTT method. After incubation with test compounds 1–4, media were replaced with 100 μL
0.5 mg/mL MTT (Sigma, M655) in RPMI without phenol red, and cells
were incubated at 37 °C overnight, after which 25 μL of
lysis buffer (15% SDS and 0.015 M HCl) was added to the cultures,
and ODs at 570 nm were read once formazen was fully dissolved. EC50 values and standard errors (SEs) were calculated from dose–response
curves using GraphPad Prism Software (La Jolla, San Diego).
Stability
in Mouse/Human Plasma and Serum
Agelastatins 1a or 1j were added to 100 μL of mouse plasma or
serum obtained and pooled from female BALB/c mice (Jackson Laboratory)
to give a final compound concentration of 50 μM (1% DMSO) and
incubated at 37 °C with gentle agitation. Time points (10 μL)
were taken at t = 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 8, 18, and 24 h.
The plasma/serum time point aliquots were treated as follows: proteins
were precipitated in CH3CN (100 μL), vortexed, and
centrifuged at room temperature (3000g) for 10 min,
and the supernatants were analyzed by LCMS. This procedure was repeated
with human AB serum (Sigman/H4522). Stability tests were performed
in triplicate.
Materials and Experimental Procedure for
PK Study
BALB/c mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory.
At 6 weeks of age, agelastatins 1a or 1j were administered via an intraperitoneal (IP) route (2.5 or 5.0
mg/kg, n = 4). The blood samples were collected from
the tail vein at the designated times. All biological specimens were
stored at −80 °C until analysis.
Plasma PK Analyses
Blood samples were thawed and precipitated with CH3CN
(100 μL), vortexed, and centrifuged at room temperature (3000g) for 10 min. The samples were concentrated and reconstituted
in 1:1 CH3CN/H2O (50 μL) for LCMS analysis.
An internal standard (4,5-dibromo-N-propyl-pyrrole-2-carboxamide;
0.5 μg/mL) was added to all samples prior to analysis. An Agilent
6230 Accurate-Mass TOFMS LCMS system was used for sample analyses.
Liquid chromatography was achieved with a Phenomenex Kinetex C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 2.6 μm) using gradient
mobile phases of aqueous CH3CN with 0.1% formic acid and
a flow rate of 0.7 mL min–1.
Phase I Metabolism
Studies
Mouse (MSMC-PL) and human (HMMC-PL) microsomes were
purchased from Life Technologies, and the assays were performed according
to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 100× stocks were
prepared in DMSO for all test compounds (1a, 1j, and 1p) and controls (7-ethoxycoumarin). The final
concentration of DMSO was <1%. The microsomes (20 mg/mL) were thawed
slowly on ice. The following were added to each Eppendorf tube: 0.1
M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4 buffer (183 μL), microsomes (5 μL;
final protein concentration = 5 mg/mL), and test compound (2 μL;
final compound concentration = 100 μM). The mixture was preincubated
at 37 °C for 5 min. The reactions were initiated upon the addition
of NADPH (10 μL of a 20 mM solution in buffer; final concentration
= 1 mM) and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with gentle agitation.
The reactions were terminated by the addition of MeOH (200 μL).
The samples were vortexed and centrifuged at room temperature (3000g) for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and analyzed by
LCMS. Controls included: zero time point with test compound; 60 min
of incubation without NADPH, heat-inactivated microsomes (boiled at
100 °C for 15 min pretreatment); incubation with the CYP substrate
7-ethoxycoumarin.
Phase II Glucuronidation Metabolism Studies
Glucuronidation metabolism studies were performed with mouse (MSS9-PL)
and human (HMS9-PL) S9 fractions purchased from Life Technologies.
The procedure was performed as described by Fisher and colleagues.[18]
Table 2
Antileukemic Activity of Select Natural and Synthetic Agelastatins
against Various CLL Patient-Derived Cell Lines
in vitro
cytotoxicity EC50 (μM)b
cmpd
Xa
Y
CLL3c
CLL4c
CLL5c
CLL6c
1a
Br
H
0.24
0.37
0.29
1.15
1d
Cl
H
3.80
1.98
0.34
2.20
1e
Cl
Cl
0.98
4.42
2.02
7.50
1g
I
H
6.61
3.04
3.06
12.9
1j
CF3
H
3.04
0.33
28.4
0.65
1n
CN
H
8.37
8.41
4.79
0.84
Flud
0.35
0.64
0.16
1.60
See Figure 2 for the substituent
key.
Standard error is ±0.01
μM for all data points.
CLL3–CLL6 = CLL patient cell lines.
Flu = fludarabine; see Figure 1 for the chemical structure.
Authors: L Meijer; A M Thunnissen; A W White; M Garnier; M Nikolic; L H Tsai; J Walter; K E Cleverley; P C Salinas; Y Z Wu; J Biernat; E M Mandelkow; S H Kim; G R Pettit Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2000-01
Authors: Yining Ji; Tobias Brueckl; Ryan D Baxter; Yuta Fujiwara; Ian B Seiple; Shun Su; Donna G Blackmond; Phil S Baran Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yuta Fujiwara; Janice A Dixon; Rodrigo A Rodriguez; Ryan D Baxter; Darryl D Dixon; Michael R Collins; Donna G Blackmond; Phil S Baran Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Morgan Jouanneau; Brandon McClary; Jeremy Chris P Reyes; Rong Chen; Yuling Chen; William Plunkett; Xin Cheng; Andrew Z Milinichik; Earl F Albone; Jun O Liu; Daniel Romo Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Ryan Gianatassio; Shuhei Kawamura; Cecil L Eprile; Klement Foo; Jason Ge; Aaron C Burns; Michael R Collins; Phil S Baran Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2014-08-03 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Alexander G O'Brien; Akinobu Maruyama; Yasuhide Inokuma; Makoto Fujita; Phil S Baran; Donna G Blackmond Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Brandon McClary; Boris Zinshteyn; Mélanie Meyer; Morgan Jouanneau; Simone Pellegrino; Gulnara Yusupova; Anthony Schuller; Jeremy Chris P Reyes; Junyan Lu; Zufeng Guo; Safiat Ayinde; Cheng Luo; Yongjun Dang; Daniel Romo; Marat Yusupov; Rachel Green; Jun O Liu Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 8.116