BACKGROUND: It is not known whether unmet palliative care needs are associated with an interest in palliative care services among patients with advanced cancer receiving ongoing oncology care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between unmet palliative care needs and patient interest in subspecialty palliative care services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: One hundred sixty-nine patients with advanced cancer receiving care from 20 oncologists at two academic cancer centers. MEASUREMENTS: Surveys assessed palliative care needs in six domains. Patients were read a description of palliative care and then asked three questions about their current interest in subspecialty palliative care services (perceived need, likelihood of requesting, willingness to see if their oncologist recommended; all outcomes on 0-10 Likert scale). RESULTS: The vast majority of patients described unmet palliative care needs, most commonly related to psychological/emotional distress (62%) and symptoms (62%). In fully adjusted models accounting for clustering by oncologist, unmet needs in these domains were associated with a higher perceived need for subspecialty palliative care services (psychological/emotional needs odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.58; p=0.01; symptom needs OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.01-1.60; p=0.04). There was no significant association between unmet needs and likelihood of requesting palliative care services. Willingness to see palliative care if oncologist recommended was high (mean 8.6/10, standard deviation [SD] 2). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced cancer and unmet symptom and psychological/emotional needs perceive a high need for subspecialty palliative care services but may not request them. Efforts to increase appropriate use of subspecialty palliative care for cancer may require oncologist-initiated referrals.
BACKGROUND: It is not known whether unmet palliative care needs are associated with an interest in palliative care services among patients with advanced cancer receiving ongoing oncology care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between unmet palliative care needs and patient interest in subspecialty palliative care services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: One hundred sixty-nine patients with advanced cancer receiving care from 20 oncologists at two academic cancer centers. MEASUREMENTS: Surveys assessed palliative care needs in six domains. Patients were read a description of palliative care and then asked three questions about their current interest in subspecialty palliative care services (perceived need, likelihood of requesting, willingness to see if their oncologist recommended; all outcomes on 0-10 Likert scale). RESULTS: The vast majority of patients described unmet palliative care needs, most commonly related to psychological/emotional distress (62%) and symptoms (62%). In fully adjusted models accounting for clustering by oncologist, unmet needs in these domains were associated with a higher perceived need for subspecialty palliative care services (psychological/emotional needs odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.58; p=0.01; symptom needs OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.01-1.60; p=0.04). There was no significant association between unmet needs and likelihood of requesting palliative care services. Willingness to see palliative care if oncologist recommended was high (mean 8.6/10, standard deviation [SD] 2). CONCLUSION:Patients with advanced cancer and unmet symptom and psychological/emotional needs perceive a high need for subspecialty palliative care services but may not request them. Efforts to increase appropriate use of subspecialty palliative care for cancer may require oncologist-initiated referrals.
Authors: Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marie Bakitas; Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Mark T Hegel; Stefan Balan; Frances C Brokaw; Janette Seville; Jay G Hull; Zhongze Li; Tor D Tosteson; Ira R Byock; Tim A Ahles Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stephen J Blumberg; Erin B Foster; Alicia M Frasier; Jennifer Satorius; Ben J Skalland; Kari L Nysse-Carris; Heather M Morrison; Sadeq R Chowdhury; Kathleen S O'Connor Journal: Vital Health Stat 1 Date: 2012-06
Authors: Thomas J Smith; Sarah Temin; Erin R Alesi; Amy P Abernethy; Tracy A Balboni; Ethan M Basch; Betty R Ferrell; Matt Loscalzo; Diane E Meier; Judith A Paice; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Mark Somerfield; Ellen Stovall; Jamie H Von Roenn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mitra Tewes; Teresa Rettler; Nathalie Wolf; Jörg Hense; Martin Schuler; Martin Teufel; Mingo Beckmann Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Yael Schenker; Douglas White; Margaret Rosenzweig; Edward Chu; Charity Moore; Peter Ellis; Peggy Nikolajski; Colleen Ford; Greer Tiver; Lauren McCarthy; Robert Arnold Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Martina Preisler; Silke Heuse; Manuel Riemer; Friederike Kendel; Anne Letsch Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Melissa Basile; Lincy Jojan; Mara R Hobler; Elisabeth P Dellon; Anna M Georgiopoulos; Jessica L Goggin; Elaine Chen; Christopher H Goss; Sarah E Hempstead; Albert Faro; Dio Kavalieratos Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Anouk S Schuit; Karen Holtmaat; Nienke Hooghiemstra; Femke Jansen; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Veerle M H Coupé; Myra E van Linde; Annemarie Becker-Commissaris; Jaap C Reijneveld; Josée M Zijlstra; Dirkje W Sommeijer; Simone E J Eerenstein; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Casey M Hay; Carolyn Lefkowits; Megan Crowley-Matoka; Marie A Bakitas; Leslie H Clark; Linda R Duska; Renata R Urban; Stephanie L Creasy; Yael Schenker Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.714