| Literature DB >> 24673416 |
K Byrne1, S McWilliam, T Vuocolo, C Gondro, N E Cockett, R L Tellam.
Abstract
The ruminant developmental transition from late foetus to lamb is associated with marked changes in skeletal muscle structure and function that reflect programming for new physiological demands following birth. To determine whether epigenetic changes are involved in this transition, we investigated the genomic architecture of the chromatin modification, histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), which typically regulates early life developmental processes; however, its role in later life processes is unclear. Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with next-generation sequencing was used to map H3K27me3 nucleosomes in ovine longissimus lumborum skeletal muscle at 100 days of gestation and 12 weeks post-partum. In both states, H3K27me3 modification was associated with genes, transcription start sites and CpG islands and with transcriptional silencing. The H3K27me3 peaks consisted of two major categories, promoter specific and regional, with the latter the dominant feature. Genes encoding homeobox transcription factors regulating early life development and genes involved in neural functions, particularly gated ion channels, were strongly modified by H3K27me3. Gene promoters differentially modified by H3K27me3 in the foetus and lamb were enriched for gated ion channels, which may reflect changes in neuromuscular function. However, most modified genes showed no changes, indicating that H3K27me3 does not have a large role in late muscle maturation. Notably, promyogenic transcription factors were strongly modified with H3K27me3 but showed no differences between the late gestation foetus and lamb, likely reflecting their lack of involvement in the myofibre fusion process occurring in this transition. H3K27me3 is a major architectural feature of the epigenetic landscape of ruminant skeletal muscle, and it comments on gene transcription and gene function in the context of late skeletal muscle development.Entities:
Keywords: ChIP-Seq; chromatin; epigenetics; muscle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24673416 PMCID: PMC4286725 DOI: 10.1111/age.12145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Genet ISSN: 0268-9146 Impact factor: 3.169
Figure 1Representative H3K27me3 nucleosome profiles. Examples of gene promoter‐specific and regional H3K27me3 nucleosome profiles identified using cisgenome (Ji et al. 2008). The H3K27me3 landscape at two loci in the bovine genome (Btau_4.0) for each of the three foetal and three lamb skeletal muscle samples is shown: (a) (BTA21:24,979,860‐25,108,423), (b) locus (BTA2:21,373,648‐21,541,479). The top track in each panel shows RefSeq genes with vertical marks denoting exons. Arrows denote the direction of transcription. Green bar, CpG island; black box, promoter‐specific enrichment of H3K27me3 nucleosomes. Data are displayed for individual animals (foetal, F1–F3, red; lamb, L1–L3, green). The ordinate shows the normalised log2 fold change enrichment for the H3K27me3 nucleosomes compared with the age‐matched input nucleosomal DNA.
Figure 2Distribution of H3K27me3 nucleosomal peaks on the bovine X chromosome. The H3K27me3‐enriched landscape across the bovine X chromosome for the foetal (F1–F3, red) and lamb (L1–L3, green) samples was determined using cisgenome. The ordinate shows the normalised log2 fold change enrichment for the H3K27me3 nucleosome data compared to the age‐matched input control. The gender of each animal also is shown. The window size for visualisation of H3K27me3 peaks across the X chromosome was 500 bp.
Figure 3Visualisation of H3K27me3 enrichment on bovine chromosome 4 using Hilbert curves. Hilbert curves were used to visualise H3K27me3 peaks along BTA 4 for each of the combined foetal and lamb samples. This fractal method folded the chromosome and its associated H3K27me3 features into two‐dimensional space whilst maintaining locality relationships. (a) Foetal, (b) lamb. Examples of regional enrichments are indicated by black boxes for three homeobox encoding gene loci: (1) the DLX loci [ (distal‐less homeobox 5), (distal‐less homeobox 6)]; (2) (engrailed homeobox 2); (3) the HOXA loci () as well as (4) (). All autosomal Hilbert curves for foetus and lamb are shown in Fig. S3, and genome coordinates for H3K27me3 peaks are reported in Table S2 and S3 respectively.
Figure 4Association of H3K27me3 with genome features. The distribution of read counts in H3K27me3 peaks in each of the combined foetal and lamb samples was measured relative to: (a) transcriptional start sites (TSS) defined by 10 891 bovine full‐length cDNA sequences (RefFlat), (b) the first nucleotide of 29 027 annotated bovine genes (RefSeq) and (c) 35,595 bovine CpG islands (CGIs). For each gene set, the distance from the gene start coordinate to each H3K27me3 peak was calculated. The number of sequence reads in 100‐bp windows of H3K27me3 peaks was derived to 10 kb in either direction from the feature. For CGIs, the boundary coordinates were used. If a peak overlapped within the CGI coordinates, the distance was collapsed to zero; otherwise, the minimum distance to the CGI was plotted using a 100‐bp window. Grey, foetal samples; black, lamb.
Figure 5H3K27me3 nucleosomes correlate with repression of gene expression. Plots show the relationship between four gene expression categories and H3K27me3 sequence reads in the promoters of genes for the foetal (a) and lamb (b) samples. The levels of H3K27me3 in the promoters of bovine RefSeq genes were measured in enriched peaks after normalisation for library size and subtraction of the normalised input control. A promoter was defined as a window 2 kb 5′ plus 500 bp 3′ to the beginning of each gene. Gene expression was measured in the same samples by microarray analysis (Byrne et al. 2010). Expression categories consisted of: no, low [log2 <4 (scaled average)], medium (log2 >4 and <8) and high expression (log2 ≥8). Corresponding scatter plots are shown in Fig. 5(c) and (d). A minimum log2 expression value of 4 was used.
DAVIDa functional annotation clusters arranged into related functional themes for foetal and lamb RefSeq genes with promoters enriched for H3K27me3
| Functional theme | Foetal functional annotation cluster number (enrichment score) | Lamb functional annotation cluster number (enrichment score) |
|---|---|---|
| Homeobox genes | 1 (20.9) | 1 (18.3) |
| Development | 1 (20.9), 12 (4.9), 16 (4.6), 21 (3.9), 22 (3.9), 35 (2.4), 38 (2.3), 41 (2.0), 44 (1.9), 52 (1.6) | 10 (5.5), 15 (5.0), 16 (4.8), 18 (3.9), 20 (3.8), 28 (2.8), 28 (2.8), 50 (1.6), 52 (1.6), 56 (1.5), 59 91.4) |
| Transcriptional regulation | 1 (20.9), 3 (11.4), 14 (4.8), 34 (2.4), 46 (1.9) | 1 (18.3), 3 (11.6), 21 (3.8), 32 (2.4) |
| Gated ion channel, ion transport, G‐protein‐coupled receptors | 2 (15.3), 4 (10.9), 5 (8.2), 6 (7.5), 7 (7.4), 8 (6.9), 10 (5.6), 11 (5.2), 15 (4.7), 17 (4.5), 25 (3.1), 33 (2.4), 39 (2.2), 43 (2.0), 47 (1.8), 48 (1.7), 51 (1.7), 58 (1.3) | 2 (15.3), 4 (10.4), 5 (8.1), 6 (7.5), 8 (6.6), 11 (5.3), 12 (5.2), 13 (5.0), 27 (2.9), 30 (2.7), 34 (2.4), 35 (2.3), 38 (2.3), 40 (2.1), 43 (1.9), 45 (1.7), 47 (1.7), 51 (1.6) |
| Neural structure and function | 11 (5.2), 12 (4.9), 21 (3.9), 22 (3.9), 40 (2.2), 43 (2.0) | 8 (6.6), 16 (4.8), 20 (3.8), 36 (2.3), 40 (2.1), 50 (1.6), 51 (1.6), 52 (1.6) |
| Muscle development | 18 (4.4), 26 (2.9), 38 (2.3) | 10 (5.5), 24 (3.4), 34 (2.4), 39 (2.1), 56 (1.5) |
| Calcium signalling | 8 (6.9), 25 (3.1), 33 (2.4), 47 (1.8) | 25 (3.2), 37 (2.3), 45 (1.7) |
DAVID functional annotation clustering (Huang da et al. 2009).
Functional themes were defined by manual identification of related functional annotation clusters.
Cluster number (enrichment score). Enrichment scores (ES) ≥ 1.3 and gene number/term ≥ 5 were considered significant. ES is defined as – log10 (mean P‐value for cluster terms). Some themes contain the same cluster number. Cluster numbers for foetus and lamb are unrelated. Full details are available in Table S4.
Figure 6Stratification of H3K27me3 density in gene promoters. Autosomal RefSeq genes containing H3K27me3 peaks within their promoters were ranked according to the level of H3K27me3 reads normalised (×100) to the highest ranked gene. (a) and (b) show histograms of the distribution of normalised H3K27me3 promoter read count as a function of gene rank for the foetal and lamb samples respectively. Enriched gene ontology molecular function terms identified using DAVID for the top ranked 1–500 genes (c) and top ranked 501–1000 genes (d) were plotted against –log10 Padj (Benjamini–Hochberg‐corrected). Red (foetal); green (lamb).
DAVIDa functional annotation clusters for genes with promoters differentially modified by H3K27me3
| Category | Term | Enrichment score |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | GO:0005886~plasma membrane | 3.1 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | Cell membrane | |
| SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Membrane | |
|
| ||
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0003001~ signal involved in cell–cell signalling | 1.4 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | Signalling | |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0046903~secretion | |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0007267~cell–cell signalling | |
|
| ||
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0030054~cell junction | 1.1 |
| SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Synapse | |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0045202~synapse | |
| SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Cell junction | |
DAVID functional annotation clustering (Huang da et al. 2009).
Enrichment scores ≥1.0 were considered significant. Full details are available in Table S5.
Gene Ontology term enrichments for genes with differential H3K27me3 promoter modification between the foetal and lamb statesa
| Term | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| GO:0003001~generation of a signal involved in cell–cell signalling | 0.01 |
| GO:0007610~behaviour | 0.03 |
| GO:0007264~small GTPase‐mediated signal transduction | 0.03 |
| GO:0045449~regulation of transcription | 0.03 |
| GO:0007242~intracellular signalling cascade | 0.04 |
| GO:0007517~muscle organ development | 0.04 |
| GO:0007214~gamma‐aminobutyric acid signalling pathway | 0.04 |
|
| |
| GO:0005886~plasma membrane | 5.30E‐05 |
| GO:0044459~plasma membrane part | 0.01 |
| GO:0019898~extrinsic to membrane | 0.03 |
DAVID analysis. Full details are available in Table S5. There were no significant terms for GO molecular function.