Literature DB >> 24673248

Developing a typology of African Americans with limited literacy based on preventive health practice orientation: implications for colorectal cancer screening strategies.

Thomas F Gordon1, Sarah Bauerle Bass, Sheryl B Ruzek, Caitlin Wolak, Michael J Rovito, Dominique G Ruggieri, Stephanie Ward, Anuradha Paranjape, Judith Greener.   

Abstract

Preventive health messages are often tailored to reach broad sociodemographic groups. However, within groups, there may be considerable variation in perceptions of preventive health practices, such as colorectal cancer screening. Segmentation analysis provides a tool for crafting messages that are tailored more closely to the mental models of targeted individuals or subgroups. This study used cluster analysis, a psychosocial marketing segmentation technique, to develop a typology of colorectal cancer screening orientation among 102 African American clinic patients between the ages of 50 and 74 years with limited literacy. Patients were from a general internal medicine clinic in a large urban teaching hospital, a subpopulation known to have high rates of colorectal cancer and low rates of screening. Preventive screening orientation variables included the patients' responses to questions involving personal attitudes and preferences toward preventive screening and general prevention practices. A k-means cluster analysis yielded three clusters of patients on the basis of their screening orientation: ready screeners (50.0%), cautious screeners (30.4%), and fearful avoiders (19.6%). The resulting typology clearly defines important subgroups on the basis of their preventive health practice perceptions. The authors propose that the development of a validated typology of patients on the basis of their preventive health perceptions could be applicable to a variety of health concerns. Such a typology would serve to standardize how populations are characterized and would provide a more accurate view of their preventive health-related attitudes, values, concerns, preferences, and behaviors. Used with standardized assessment tools, it would provide an empirical basis for tailoring health messages and improving medical communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24673248      PMCID: PMC9036489          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.872725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  40 in total

1.  Segmenting the antihistamine market: an investigation of consumer preferences.

Authors:  G Reardon; D S Pathak
Journal:  J Health Care Mark       Date:  1990-09

2.  Psychographic segmentation for marketing success. Health related attitudes and lifestyles are the key.

Authors:  K W Endresen
Journal:  Healthc Exec       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr

3.  Consumer preferences for general practitioner services.

Authors:  Mark Morrison; Tom Murphy; Craig Nalder
Journal:  Health Mark Q       Date:  2003

Review 4.  A segmentation analysis of consumer uses of health information.

Authors:  D C Risker
Journal:  Health Mark Q       Date:  1995

5.  Understanding consumers' health information preferences: development and validation of a brief screening instrument.

Authors:  Edward W Maibach; Deanne Weber; Holly Massett; Gregory R Hancock; Simani Price
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006-12

6.  Smokers' attitudes and behaviors related to consumer demand for cessation counseling in the medical care setting.

Authors:  Deanne Weber; Lisa S Wolff; Tracy Orleans; Robin E Mockenhaupt; Holly A Massett; Kathryn Kahler Vose
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  A shortened instrument for literacy screening.

Authors:  Pat F Bass; John F Wilson; Charles H Griffith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.

Authors:  T C Davis; S W Long; R H Jackson; E J Mayeaux; R B George; P W Murphy; M A Crouch
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Colorectal cancer knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors in African Americans.

Authors:  Pauline M Green; Beatrice Adderley Kelly
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior?

Authors:  Aimee S James; Marci Kramish Campbell; Marlyn Allicock Hudson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  6 in total

1.  African-American Cancer Survivors' Use of Religious Beliefs to Positively Influence the Utilization of Cancer Care.

Authors:  Jill B Hamilton; Kayoll V Galbraith; Nakia C Best; Valarie C Worthy; L T C Angelo D Moore
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2015-10

2.  How Do Low-Literacy Populations Perceive "Dirty Bombs"? Implications for Preparedness Messages.

Authors:  Sarah Bauerle Bass; Thomas F Gordon; Laurie Maurer; Judith Greener; Gabriella Mora; Dominique Ruggieri; Caitlin Wolak; Claudia Parvanta
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 3.  Medical Mistrust and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African Americans.

Authors:  Leslie B Adams; Jennifer Richmond; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Wizdom Powell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-10

4.  Randomized Trial of a Computerized Touch Screen Decision Aid to Increase Acceptance of Colonoscopy Screening in an African American Population with Limited Literacy.

Authors:  Sheryl B Ruzek; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Judith Greener; Caitlin Wolak; Thomas F Gordon
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-03-03

5.  Medical Mistrust and PrEP Perceptions Among Transgender Women: A Cluster Analysis.

Authors:  Paul A D'Avanzo; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Jesse Brajuha; Luis Gutierrez-Mock; Nicole Ventriglia; Carine Wellington; Jae Sevelius
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.879

6.  Current developments in delivering customized care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Etienne Minvielle; Aude Fourcade; Thomas Ricketts; Mathias Waelli
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.