Literature DB >> 24673121

Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of 1612 cases from the ACS-NSQIP surgical outcomes database.

Jason D Wink1, John P Fischer, Jonas A Nelson, Joseph M Serletti, Liza C Wu.   

Abstract

There is continued debate about the outcomes of direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction when compared to a two-stage expander/implant approach. The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes after DTI reconstruction utilising the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database. This study reviewed the 2005-2010 ACS-NSQIP databases identifying encounters with common procedural terminology codes for DTI (19340) (mastectomy and immediate implant placement). A composite variable of "major surgical complications" (deep infection, return to OR, device loss) was used as the dependent variable in the analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for pre- and intraoperative factors associated with the occurrence of "major surgical complications". Overall, 1612 patients underwent one stage, DTI reconstruction with an average age of 50.8 ± 10.7 years with a body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) of 26.9 ± 6.3 kg/m2. The incidence of major surgical complications was 9%. A multivariate regression analysis revealed obesity (OR = 1.54, p = 0.03), active smoking (OR = 1.60, p = 0.044), and prolonged operative time (>1 SD above average) (OR = 1.88, p = 0.002) were associated with surgical morbidity. The results of the analysis emphasize that DTI-based breast reconstruction can be an excellent option for a specific group of patients. Careful pre-operative patient selection will optimise outcomes, and caution must be used in assessing suitability of DTI in obese patients and active smokers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implant; breast reconstruction; direct-to-implant; single-stage

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24673121     DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2014.899240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg        ISSN: 2000-6764


  12 in total

1.  Late Surgical-Site Infection in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Indranil Sinha; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins; Jennifer B Hamill; Xiaoxue Chen; Hyungjin M Kim; Gretchen Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  The relationship of human acellular dermal matrix thickness on complication rate and patient-reported outcomes in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Seung Eun Hong; Jung-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

4.  Infection Prophylaxis for Breast Implant Surgery: Could We Do Better?

Authors:  Julia R Henderson; Sandhir Kandola; Susan P Hignett; Rebecca L Teasdale; Ashley R Topps; Mandana Pennick; Meiju Hwang; Nicola Barnes; Cliona C Kirwan
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2017-06-14

5.  Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shelley Potter; Elizabeth J Conroy; Ramsey I Cutress; Paula R Williamson; Lisa Whisker; Steven Thrush; Joanna Skillman; Nicola L P Barnes; Senthurun Mylvaganam; Elisabeth Teasdale; Abhilash Jain; Matthew D Gardiner; Jane M Blazeby; Chris Holcombe
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Routine Laser-assisted Indocyanine Green Angiography in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Is It Worth the Cost?

Authors:  Shayda Mirhaidari; Vitali Azouz; Douglas S Wagner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-04-25

7.  Study of Inflammatory and Infection Markers in Periprosthetic Fluid: Correlation with Blood Analysis in Retrospective and Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Andrea Lisa; Cristina Belgiovine; Luca Maione; Andrea Rimondo; Andrea Battistini; Benedetta Agnelli; Matteo Murolo; Leonardo Galtelli; Marta Monari; Marco Klinger; Valeriano Vinci
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effects of COVID-19 on mastectomy and breast reconstruction rates: A national surgical sample.

Authors:  Robyn N Rubenstein; Carrie S Stern; Ethan L Plotsker; Kathryn Haglich; Audree B Tadros; Babak J Mehrara; Evan Matros; Jonas A Nelson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.885

9.  High-Efficiency Same-Day Approach to Breast Reconstruction During the COVID-19 Crisis.

Authors:  Michelle Specht; Nikhil Sobti; Nikki Rosado; Eleanor Tomczyk; Olivia Abbate; Dan Ellis; Eric C Liao
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Early Postoperative Complications From National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: A Closer Examination of Timing and Technique of Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Maryam Saheb-Al-Zamani; Erin Cordeiro; Anne C O'Neill; Stefan O P Hofer; Tulin D Cil; Toni Zhong
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.