| Literature DB >> 24672764 |
Hassan Khajehpour1, Alireza Mehri Dehnavi1, Hossein Taghizad1, Esmat Khajehpour2, Mohammadreza Naeemabadi1.
Abstract
Most of the erythrocyte related diseases are detectable by hematology images analysis. At the first step of this analysis, segmentation and detection of blood cells are inevitable. In this study, a novel method using a line operator and watershed algorithm is rendered for erythrocyte detection and segmentation in blood smear images, as well as reducing over-segmentation in watershed algorithm that is useful for segmentation of different types of blood cells having partial overlap. This method uses gray scale structure of blood cell, which is obtained by exertion of Euclidian distance transform on binary images. Applying this transform, the gray intensity of cell images gradually reduces from the center of cells to their margins. For detecting this intensity variation structure, a line operator measuring gray level variations along several directional line segments is applied. Line segments have maximum and minimum gray level variations has a special pattern that is applicable for detections of the central regions of cells. Intersection of these regions with the signs which are obtained by calculating of local maxima in the watershed algorithm was applied for cells' centers detection, as well as a reduction in over-segmentation of watershed algorithm. This method creates 1300 sign in segmentation of 1274 erythrocytes available in 25 blood smear images. Accuracy and sensitivity of the proposed method are equal to 95.9% and 97.99%, respectively. The results show the proposed method's capability in detection of erythrocytes in blood smear images.Entities:
Keywords: Blood smear images; line operator; watershed algorithm
Year: 2013 PMID: 24672764 PMCID: PMC3959006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Signals Sens ISSN: 2228-7477
Figure 1(a) The original image. (b) The gray intensity image of the original image. (c) The erosion image of Figure 1b using circular structuring element in diameter of 5 pixels. (d) The morphological reconstructed image under the mask in Figure 1b. (e) The binary image of Figure 1d produced by global thresholding. (f) The complement distance transform of Figure 1e. (g) The binary image of Figure 1f using (3). (h) The peak image of Figure 1f obtained using (5). (i) The score image of Figure 1h. (j) The filtered image of Figure 1i with first-order derivative of Gaussian filter. (k) The binary image resulted from thersholding of the difference image between Figure 1i and Figure 1j using Otsu's method. (l) Local maxima of Figure 1f. (m) The multiplied image of Figure 1l and 1k. (n) The centers of bright spots in m on the original image with blue points. (o) The Watershed transforms of Figure 1f using markers in Figure 1m. (p) The watershed lines of Figure 1o are seen black in the original image
Figure 2(a) The Euclidean distance transform of a binary image of a circle. (b) The line operator with the length 21 and 20 different directional line segments. (c) The convolution mask that is valued 1 in the quadrants I and III and valued – 1 in the quadrants II and IV
Figure 3(a) The original image. (b) The gray intensity form of theoriginal image. (c) The erosion image with circular structuring element in diameter of 5 pixels. (d) The morphological reconstructed image under the mask of Figure 3b. (e) The binary image of d using global thresholding. (f) The complement distance transform of Figure 3e. (g) The binary image of Figure 3f using equation 3. (h) The peak image from f obtained using equation 5. (i) The score image of Figure 3h. (j) The filtered image of Figure 3i using first-order derivative of Gaussian filter. (k) The binary image resulted from thersholding of difference image between Figure 3i and Figure 3j using Otsu's method. (l) The local maxima of Figure 3f. (m) The multiplied image of Figure 3l and Figure 3k. (n) The centers of bright spots in Figure 3m on the original image, shown by blue points. (o) The watershed transforms of Figure 3f using markers in Figure 3m. (p) The watershed lines of Figure 3o are seen black in the original image
Figure 4The first column from left: The eliminated local maxima causing the over-segmentation. The second column: Watershed algorithm with mere use of local maxima as markers (without elimination of local maxima in the first column). The third column: The watershed lines of the binary images in the second column on the original images. Some of additional segmentations eliminated by the proposed method are shown by green arrows
Comparison between the proposed method and mere use of local maxima
Figure 5Segmentation results of the proposed method: The red squares show the number of watershed segmentations with mere use of local maxima as markers. The blue squares show the number of watershed segmentations using the proposed method. The green squares show the number of blood cells with manual counting