Literature DB >> 24671869

Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tim D G Belderbos1, Max Leenders1, Leon M G Moons1, Peter D Siersema1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Local recurrence has been observed after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. The indications for follow-up colonoscopy and the optimal time interval are currently unclear. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the frequency of local recurrence after EMR, to identify risk factors for recurrence, and to provide follow-up recommendations.
METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. EMR was defined as endoscopic snare resection after submucosal fluid injection for removal of nonpedunculated adenomas and early carcinomas. Local recurrence was subdivided into early recurrence (detected at the first follow-up colonoscopy) and late recurrence (detected after ≥ 1 previous normal colonoscopy). A random effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled estimate of risk of recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 33 studies were included. The mean recurrence risk after EMR was 15 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 12 % - 19 %). Recurrence risk was higher after piecemeal resection (20 %; 95 %CI 16 % - 25 %) than after en bloc resection (3 %; 95 %CI 2 % - 5 %; P < 0.0001). In 15 studies that differentiated between early and late recurrences, 152/173 recurrences (88 %) occurred early. In four studies with follow-up at 3, 6, and ≥ 12 months, 19/25 (76 %) recurrences were detected at 3 months, increasing to 24 (96 %) at 6 months. In multivariable analysis, only piecemeal resection was associated with recurrence (3 of 3 studies).
CONCLUSION: Local recurrence after EMR of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions occurs in 3 % of en bloc resections and 20 % of piecemeal resections. Piecemeal resection was the only independent risk factor for recurrence. As more than 90 % of recurrences are detected at 6 months after EMR, we propose that 6 months is the optimal initial follow-up interval. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671869     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1364970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  76 in total

1.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Recurrence with malignancy after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps with high-grade dysplasia: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Ashraf Abushahin; Meena Sadaps; Mohammad Alomari; John Vargo; Deepa Patil; Rocio Lopez; Matthew Kalady; Conor P Delaney; Emre Gorgun; James Church; Yutaka Saito; Carol A Burke; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Çağlayan Keklikkıran; Osman Cavit Özdoğan
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Robert J Schenck; Darius A Jahann; James T Patrie; Edward B Stelow; Dawn G Cox; Dushant S Uppal; Bryan G Sauer; Vanessa M Shami; Daniel S Strand; Andrew Y Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer due to incomplete adenoma resection: A nationwide, population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tim Dg Belderbos; Hendrikus Jm Pullens; Max Leenders; Marguerite Ei Schipper; Peter D Siersema; Martijn Gh van Oijen
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Complication and local recurrence rate after endoscopic resection of large high-risk colorectal adenomas of ≥3 cm in size.

Authors:  J Seidel; E Färber; R Baumbach; W Cordruwisch; U Böhmler; B Feyerabend; S Faiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Endoscopic versus surgical resection for early colorectal cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gustavo Luis Rodela Silva; Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Vinicius Leite de Castro; Cintia Morais; Elisa Ryoka Baba; Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

9.  En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection is equally effective for sessile serrated polyps and conventional adenomas.

Authors:  Amol Agarwal; Sidyarth Garimall; Frank I Scott; Nuzhat A Ahmad; Michael L Kochman; Gregory G Ginsberg; Vinay Chandrasekhara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection with double-tunnel technique for en bloc resection of large rectal laterally spreading tumor.

Authors:  Stefanos P Bassioukas; Charalampis Katzakis; Christos Kitsios; Akrivi Pantazopoulou
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.