Literature DB >> 17260407

3.0 Tesla imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Raymond Kuo1, Mahendra Panchal, Larry Tanenbaum, John V Crues.   

Abstract

High-field MRI at 3.0T is rapidly gaining clinical acceptance and experiencing more widespread use. The superiority of high-field imaging has clearly been demonstrated for neurological imaging. The impact of 3.0T imaging of the musculoskeletal system has been less dramatic due to complex optimization issues. Areas under consideration include coil technology, protocol modification, artifact reduction, and patient safety. In this article we review these issues and describe our experience with 3.0T musculoskeletal MRI. Fundamentally, an increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is responsible for improved imaging at higher field strength. Increased SNR allows more headroom to adjust parameters that affect image resolution and examination time. It has been established that T1 relaxation time increases at 3.0T, while T2 time decreases. Consequently, scanner parameters require adjustment for optimization of images. Chemical shift and magnetic susceptibility artifacts are more pronounced and require special techniques to minimize the effect on image quality. Spectral fat saturation techniques can take advantage of the increased chemical shift. The specific absorption rate (SAR) and acoustic noise thresholds must be kept in mind at these higher fields. We additionally present some of the clinical issues we have experienced at 3.0T. A decision must be made as to whether to trade higher resolution for reduced scanning time. In general, we believe that routine imaging at 3.0T increases diagnostic confidence, especially for evaluations of cartilaginous and ligamentous structures. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17260407     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  22 in total

1.  Advanced MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging.

Authors:  Lauren Shapiro; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry Gold
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.800

3.  Optimized spectrally selective steady-state free precession sequences for cartilage imaging at ultra-high fields.

Authors:  O Bieri; T C Mamisch; S Trattnig; O Kraff; M E Ladd; K Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  MRI follow-up of subchondral signal abnormalities in a selected group of chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Khai S Lam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  High resolution morphologic imaging and T2 mapping of cartilage at 7 Tesla: comparison of cartilage repair patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Ding Xia; Orrin Sherman; Eric Strauss; Laith Jazrawi; Michael P Recht; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Half-dose versus full-dose macrocyclic gadolinium at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric bone and soft-tissue disease.

Authors:  Giovanna Stefania Colafati; Enrica Rossi; Chiara Carducci; Simone Piga; Ioan Paul Voicu; Angela Mastronuzzi; Paolo Tomà
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-07-25

Review 7.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 tesla (preliminary experience).

Authors:  Teresa Victoria; Diego Jaramillo; Timothy Paul Leslie Roberts; Deborah Zarnow; Ann Michelle Johnson; Jorge Delgado; Erika Rubesova; Arastoo Vossough
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-03-27

8.  Assessment of cartilage-dedicated sequences at ultra-high-field MRI: comparison of imaging performance and diagnostic confidence between 3.0 and 7.0 T with respect to osteoarthritis-induced changes at the knee joint.

Authors:  Robert Stahl; Roland Krug; Douglas A C Kelley; Jin Zuo; C Benjamin Ma; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Parenchymal signal intensity in 3-T body MRI of dogs with hematopoietic neoplasia.

Authors:  Daniel A Feeney; Leslie C Sharkey; Susan M Steward; Katherine L Bahr; Michael S Henson; Daisuke Ito; Timothy D O'Brien; Carl R Jessen; Brian D Husbands; Antonella Borgatti; Jaime F Modiano
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 10.  Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Filippo Del Grande; Francesco Santini; Daniel A Herzka; Michael R Aro; Cooper W Dean; Garry E Gold; John A Carrino
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.