Literature DB >> 24671362

EPR dosimetry intercomparison using smart phone touch screen glass.

Paola Fattibene1, Francois Trompier, Albrecht Wieser, Maria Brai, Bartlomej Ciesielski, Cinzia De Angelis, Sara Della Monaca, Tristan Garcia, H Gustafsson, Eli Olag Hole, M Juniewicz, K Krefft, Anna Longo, Philippe Leveque, Eva Lund, Maurizio Marrale, Barbara Michalec, Gabriela Mierzwińska, J L Rao, Alexander A Romanyukha, Hasan Tuner.   

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an interlaboratory comparison of retrospective dosimetry using the electron paramagnetic resonance method. The test material used in this exercise was glass coming from the touch screens of smart phones that might be used as fortuitous dosimeters in a large-scale radiological incident. There were 13 participants to whom samples were dispatched, and 11 laboratories reported results. The participants received five calibration samples (0, 0.8, 2, 4, and 10 Gy) and four blindly irradiated samples (0, 0.9, 1.3, and 3.3 Gy). Participants were divided into two groups: for group A (formed by three participants), samples came from a homogeneous batch of glass and were stored in similar setting; for group B (formed by eight participants), samples came from different smart phones and stored in different settings of light and temperature. The calibration curves determined by the participants of group A had a small error and a critical level in the 0.37-0.40-Gy dose range, whereas the curves determined by the participants of group B were more scattered and led to a critical level in the 1.3-3.2-Gy dose range for six participants out of eight. Group A were able to assess the dose within 20 % for the lowest doses (<1.5 Gy) and within 5 % for the highest doses. For group B, only the highest blind dose could be evaluated in a reliable way because of the high critical values involved. The results from group A are encouraging, whereas the results from group B suggest that the influence of environmental conditions and the intervariability of samples coming from different smart phones need to be further investigated. An alongside conclusion is that the protocol was easily transferred to participants making a network of laboratories in case of a mass casualty event potentially feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671362     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0533-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  8 in total

1.  New computer procedure for routine EPR-dosimetry on tooth enamel: description and verification.

Authors:  A A Koshta; A Wieser; E A Ignatiev; S Bayankin; A A Romanyukha; M O Degteva
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Overview of physical and biophysical techniques for accident dosimetry.

Authors:  F Trompier; C Bassinet; S Della Monaca; A Romanyukha; R Reyes; I Clairand
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  EPR dosimetry using commercial glasses for high gamma doses.

Authors:  Maria Inês Teixeira; Gilberto M Ferraz; Linda V E Caldas
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  EPR investigation of the gamma radiation response of different types of glasses.

Authors:  Veselka Gancheva; Nicola D Yordanov; Yordanka Karakirova
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 4.098

5.  Radiation accident dosimetry on glass by TL and EPR spectrometry.

Authors:  C Bassinet; F Trompier; I Clairand
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Weighted least-squares approach to calculating limits of detection and quantification by modeling variability as a function of concentration.

Authors:  M E Zorn; R D Gibbons; W C Sonzogni
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB).

Authors:  U Kulka; L Ainsbury; M Atkinson; J F Barquinero; L Barrios; C Beinke; G Bognar; A Cucu; F Darroudi; P Fattibene; O Gil; E Gregoire; V Hadjidekova; S Haghdoost; R Herranz; A Jaworska; C Lindholm; R Mkacher; S Mörtl; A Montoro; J Moquet; M Moreno; A Ogbazghi; U Oestreicher; F Palitti; G Pantelias; I Popescu; M J Prieto; H Romm; K Rothkamm; L Sabatier; S Sommer; G Terzoudi; A Testa; H Thierens; F Trompier; I Turai; V Vandersickel; P Vaz; P Voisin; A Vral; F Ugletveit; C Woda; A Wojcik
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 8.  Radiation-induced signals analysed by EPR spectrometry applied to fortuitous dosimetry.

Authors:  François Trompier; Celine Bassinet; Albrecht Wieser; Cinzia De Angelis; Daniela Viscomi; Paola Fattibene
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.663

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  EPRBioDose 2013: EPR applications and biological dosimetry.

Authors:  A Wieser; F Darroudi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Preparation of Electrospun Active Molecules Membrane Application to Atmospheric Free Radicals.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Guoying Wang; Xin Li; Yves Iradukunda; Fengshuo Liu; Zhiqian Li; Hongli Gao; Gaofeng Shi
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Monosodium glutamate for accidental, retrospective, and medical dosimetry using electron spin resonance.

Authors:  Eder J Guidelli; Iara S Lima; Oswaldo Baffa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Tooth Retrospective Dosimetry Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Influence of Irradiated Dental Composites.

Authors:  Céline M Desmet; Andrej Djurkin; Ana Maria Dos Santos-Goncalvez; Ruhong Dong; Maciej M Kmiec; Kyo Kobayashi; Kevin Rychert; Sébastien Beun; Julian G Leprince; Gaëtane Leloup; Philippe Levêque; Bernard Gallez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The effect of sunlight and UV lamp exposure on EPR signals in X-ray irradiated touch screens of mobile phones.

Authors:  Małgorzata Juniewicz; Agnieszka Marciniak; Bartłomiej Ciesielski; Anita Prawdzik-Dampc; Mirosław Sawczak; Piotr Boguś
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Time evolution of radiation-induced EPR signals in different types of mobile phone screen glasses.

Authors:  Małgorzata Juniewicz; Bartłomiej Ciesielski; Agnieszka Marciniak; Anita Prawdzik-Dampc
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 1.925

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.