Literature DB >> 24671354

Intuitive user interfaces increase efficiency in endoscope tip control.

Esther Rozeboom1, Jeroen Ruiter, Michel Franken, Ivo Broeders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flexible endoscopes are increasingly used to perform advanced intraluminal and transluminal interventions. These complex interventions demand accurate and efficient control, however, current endoscopes lack intuitiveness and ergonomic control of the endoscope tip. Alternative handheld controllers can improve intuitiveness and ergonomics, though previous studies are inconclusive concerning their effect on the efficiency of endoscope manipulation. The aim of this study is to determine the efficiency of a robotic system with intuitive user interface in controlling the tip of the flexible endoscope.
METHODS: We compared the efficiency of time and tip trajectory when steering the endoscope tip using the conventional steering wheels and a robotic platform with three different user interfaces: a touchpad in combination with a position control algorithm, a joystick combined with linear rate control, and a joystick combined with non-linear rate control. Fourteen participants, without a medical background, used all four interfaces. They performed both large navigational and fine targeting tasks in a simulated environment which allowed objective cross-subject comparison. Afterward, the participants were asked to select their preferred steering method.
RESULTS: Participants were significantly faster in steering the endoscope tip when using robotic steering compared to using the conventional steering method. Between the robotic interfaces, using the touchpad was significantly faster compared to the joystick with linear rate control. Use of the joystick with non-linear rate control led to a shorter tip trajectory compared to the touchpad. The majority of participants preferred the joystick with non-linear rate control over the other steering methods.
CONCLUSIONS: This work shows that intuitive user interfaces can improve the efficiency of endoscope tip steering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671354     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3510-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

Review 1.  A technical review of flexible endoscopic multitasking platforms.

Authors:  Baldwin Po Man Yeung; Terence Gourlay
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Comparison of manual steering and steering via joystick of a flexible rhino endoscope.

Authors:  R Eckl; J J Gumprecht; G Strauss; M Hofer; A Dietz; T C Lueth
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

3.  Experimental endoscopic submucosal dissection training in a porcine model: learning experience of skilled Western endoscopists.

Authors:  Frieder Berr; Thierry Ponchon; Daniel Neureiter; Tobias Kiesslich; Jelle Haringsma; Georg F Kaehler; Friedrich Schmoll; Helmut Messmann; Naohisa Yahagi; Tsuneo Oyama
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 7.559

4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Shiro Oka; Iwao Kaneko; Mayuko Hirata; Ritsuo Mouri; Hiroyuki Kanao; Shigeto Yoshida; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope.

Authors:  Georg O Spaun; Bin Zheng; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Advanced endoscopic technologies.

Authors:  Kevin M Reavis; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Ergonomics and GI endoscopy.

Authors:  Amandeep K Shergill; Kenneth R McQuaid; David Rempel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Evaluation of flexible endoscope steering using haptic guidance.

Authors:  Rob Reilink; Stefano Stramigioli; Astrid M L Kappers; Sarthak Misra
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 10.  Current developments in natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Application of robotics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review.

Authors:  Baldwin Po Man Yeung; Philip Wai Yan Chiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Dual-Continuum Design Approach for Intuitive and Low-Cost Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Nicolo Garbin; Long Wang; James H Chandler; Keith L Obstein; Nabil Simaan; P Valdastri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Flexible Gastro-intestinal Endoscopy - Clinical Challenges and Technical Achievements.

Authors:  Niehls Kurniawan; Martin Keuchel
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 7.271

4.  Feasibility of joystick guided colonoscopy.

Authors:  Esther D Rozeboom; Ivo A M J Broeders; Paul Fockens
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-05-10

5.  Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy.

Authors:  N van der Stap; E D Rozeboom; H J M Pullens; F van der Heijden; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.924

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.