Literature DB >> 17591481

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization.

Shinji Tanaka1, Shiro Oka, Iwao Kaneko, Mayuko Hirata, Ritsuo Mouri, Hiroyuki Kanao, Shigeto Yoshida, Kazuaki Chayama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been positively applied to and gradually standardized for early stomach cancer, particularly in Japan. However, because it is technically difficult to perform ESD of the colon, ESD is not a commonly used technique.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of standardizing colorectal ESD.
SETTING: ESD was performed at the Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital.
DESIGN: Time required for ESD, rate of complete en bloc resection, complication, and postoperative local persistence and recurrence were investigated retrospectively in 70 cases of colorectal neoplasia, wherein the lesion was more than 20 mm in diameter.
INTERVENTIONS: All lesions were resected by ESD.
RESULTS: The average (+/-SD) time required for ESD was 70.5+/-45.9 minutes (range, 15-180 minutes), and the histologic rate of complete en bloc resection was 80.0% (56/70). With regard to complication, 1.4% of cases of postoperative hemorrhage (1/70) and 10.0% of cases of perforation (7/70) were observed in total. The rate of perforation was investigated with respect to the type of knife used for ESD and the period after the induction of ESD. The rate of perforation markedly decreased with the practice of the technique. Moreover, the rate of perforation was high when an insulated-tip diathermic knife was used; practicing this technique was insufficient to reduce the rate of perforation. The average duration of follow-up was 614+/-289.5 days, and no case of local persistence and recurrence or metastasis was observed. LIMITATIONS: The ESD technique depends on the level of each skill of each colonoscopist.
CONCLUSIONS: With regard to ESD of the colon, complication, eg, perforation, could be decreased by sufficient practice and selection of an appropriate knife. It is suggested that, in the near future, ESD will be standardized for the colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17591481     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  156 in total

1.  Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Guh Jung Seo; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Chang Won Hong; Byung Chang Kim; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Therapeutic options for iatrogenic colon perforation: feasibility of endoscopic clip closure and predictors of the need for early surgery.

Authors:  Sung Bum Cho; Wan Sik Lee; Young Eun Joo; Hyeng Rok Kim; Sang Wook Park; Chang Hwan Park; Hyeun Soo Kim; Sung Kyu Choi; Jong Sun Rew
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Nobuaki Yagi; Yuji Naito; Toshikazu Yoshikawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A Western single-center experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Sergio Coda; Paolo Trentino; Fabio Antonellis; Barbara Porowska; Francesco Gossetti; Franco Ruberto; Francesco Pugliese; Giulia D'Amati; Paolo Negro; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Eric K Johnson; Bradley Champagne; Brad Davis; Sang Lee; David Rivadeneira; Howard Ross; Dana A Hayden; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Possibility of ex vivo animal training model for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Nobuaki Yagi; Yutaka Inada; Munehiro Kugai; Kazuhiro Kamada; Kazuhiro Katada; Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Takeshi Ishikawa; Tomohisa Takagi; Osamu Handa; Hideyuki Konishi; Satoshi Kokura; Ken Inoue; Naoki Wakabayashi; Yasuhisa Abe; Akio Yanagisawa; Yuji Naito
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Learning curve analysis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for laterally spreading tumors by endoscopists experienced in gastric ESD.

Authors:  Han Ho Jeon; Hye Sun Lee; Young Hoon Youn; Jae Joon Park; Hyojin Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination.

Authors:  Jason Ferreira; Paul Akerman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

9.  Comparison of clinical outcomes among different endoscopic resection methods for treating colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Yun Jung Kim; Eun Soo Kim; Kwang Bum Cho; Kyung Sik Park; Byoung Kuk Jang; Woo Jin Chung; Jae Seok Hwang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors involving the appendiceal orifice.

Authors:  Tomoaki Tashima; Ken Ohata; Kouichi Nonaka; Eiji Sakai; Yohei Minato; Hajime Horiuchi; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.