Literature DB >> 24670281

Evaluation of stability after orthognathic surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation: comparison according to 3 types of fixation.

Ji-Young Lee1, Young-Kyun Kim, Pil-Young Yun, Nam-Ki Lee, Jong-Wan Kim, Joon-Ho Choi.   

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the patterns and amount of postsurgical relapse after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation. We also compared the stability of plate according to types. From January 2009 to February 2012, 26 patients (13 males, 13 females) at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were identified. All patients underwent presurgical orthodontic treatment in less than 6 months and had mandibular setback surgery. Lateral cephalograms were taken presurgically (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and 6 months after surgery (T2). To evaluate surgical change and surgical relapse, linear and angular measurements were performed, and results were analyzed. Comparison of the vertical and horizontal relapses between groups (group 1: sliding plate, group 2: conventional metal plate, group 3: resorbable plate) was also performed. The overall mandibular relapse was 2.80 (SD, 3.86) mm (pogonion) and 3.85 (SD, 4.44) mm (menton) anteriorly, and 1.2 (SD, 3.39) (pogonion) and 1.47 (SD, 3.48) mm (menton) superiorly. There was no significant difference among the 3 groups, however (P > 0.05). When mandibular setback surgery was performed, surgical relapse would occur anteriorly and superiorly. Significant difference can hardly be found among the 3 groups in terms of the amount of vertical and horizontal relapses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24670281     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative complications in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Jędrzejewski; T Smektała; K Sporniak-Tutak; R Olszewski
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Bioabsorbable osteofixation for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Young-Wook Park
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02-19

3.  Modern Surgery-First Approach Concept in Cleft-Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Cohort Study with 3D Quantitative Analysis of Surgical-Occlusion Setup.

Authors:  Hyung Joon Seo; Rafael Denadai; Betty Chien-Jung Pai; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Sun-Kyu Choi; Jung-Gon Lee; Han-Chang Yu; Sang-Yun Kim; Young-Kyun Kim; Yonsoo Shin; Nam-Ki Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Finite Element Stress Analysis of Keyhole Plate System in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.

Authors:  Ju-Won Kim; Kang-Nam Park; Chang-Hyeon Lee; Yong-Su Kim; Young-Hee Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosyntheses in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B van Bakelen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.612

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.