| Literature DB >> 24669227 |
Zheng Li1, Ya-Na Geng1, Jian-Dong Jiang2, Wei-Jia Kong1.
Abstract
Oxidative stress and inflammation are proved to be critical for the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus. Berberine (BBR) is a natural compound isolated from plants such as Coptis chinensis and Hydrastis canadensis and with multiple pharmacological activities. Recent studies showed that BBR had antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, which contributed in part to its efficacy against diabetes mellitus. In this review, we summarized the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of BBR as well as their molecular basis. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of BBR were noted with changes in oxidative stress markers, antioxidant enzymes, and proinflammatory cytokines after BBR administration in diabetic animals. BBR inhibited oxidative stress and inflammation in a variety of tissues including liver, adipose tissue, kidney and pancreas. Mechanisms of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of BBR were complex, which involved multiple cellular kinases and signaling pathways, such as AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) pathway, and nuclear factor- κ B (NF- κ B) pathway. Detailed mechanisms and pathways for the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of BBR still need further investigation. Clarification of these issues could help to understand the pharmacology of BBR in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and promote the development of antidiabetic natural products.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24669227 PMCID: PMC3942282 DOI: 10.1155/2014/289264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effects of BBR on parameters of oxidative stress in animals with diabetes mellitus.
| References | Diabetic animal model | Administration of BBR |
Tissues | Effects of BBR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxidative stress markers | Antioxidant enzymes | ||||||
| MDA | GSH | SOD | GSH-Px | ||||
| [ | Wistar rats, STZ 60 mg/kg, single i.p. injection | 200 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 12 weeks | Serum | ↓ | ND | ↑ | ND |
|
| |||||||
| [ | SD rats, STZ 60 mg/kg, single tail vein injection | 200 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 12 weeks | Serum | ↓ | ND | ↑ | ND |
|
| |||||||
| [ | Wistar rats, STZ 35 mg/kg, single i.p. injection, HFD for 14 weeks after 2 weeks on diabetes | 75, 150, and 300 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 16 weeks | Serum and liver | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
|
| |||||||
| [ | ddY mice, STZ 100 mg/kg, single i.p. injection | 200 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 2 weeks | Liver | ND | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ |
|
| |||||||
| [ | SD rats, HFD for 2 weeks, then STZ 35 mg/kg, single i.p. injection | 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 6 weeks | Liver | — | — | — | ND |
|
| |||||||
| [ | ICR mice, nicotinamide 1000 mg/kg + STZ 100 mg/kg, single i.p. injection | 100 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 2 weeks | Liver and kidney | ↓ | ND | ↑ | ND |
|
| |||||||
| [ | SD rats, HFD for 4 weeks, then STZ 40 mg/kg, single i.p. injection, HFD for another 8 weeks | 100 and 200 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 8 weeks | Kidney | ↓ | ND | ↑ | ND |
|
| |||||||
| [ | Wistar rats, STZ 35 mg/kg, single i.p. injection, HFD for 14 weeks after 2 weeks on diabetes | 75, 150 and 300 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 16 weeks | Pancreas | ↓ | ND | ↑ | ND |
|
| |||||||
| [ | Wistar rats, alloxan 55 mg/kg, single tail vein injection, then on HFD | 100 and 200 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 21 days | Heart | ↓ | ND | ↑ | ↑ |
|
| |||||||
| [ | Wistar rats, STZ 60 mg/kg, single i.p. injection | 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 30 days | Cortex and hippocampus | ↓ | ↑ | ND | ND |
|
| |||||||
| [ | Wistar rats, STZ 55 mg/kg, single i.p. injection | 50 and 100 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 8 weeks | Hippocampus | ↓ | ND | ↑ | ND |
↓: decrease, ↑: increase, ND: not determined, —: no effect; BBR: berberine, MDA: malondialdehyde, GSH: glutathione, SOD: superoxide dismutase, GSH-Px: glutathione peroxidase, STZ: streptozotocin, p.o.: per os/oral administration, i.p.: intraperitoneal, HFD: high fat diet.
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the molecular mechanisms and pathways of BBR in reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. (1) BBR could inhibit oxidative stress by upregulation of SOD, UCP2 and downregulation of NADPH oxidase expression, which was possible to be mediated by the SIRT1/FOXO or AMPK pathway. (2) BBR administration induced the activation of the Nrf2 pathway, which was crucial for the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of BBR. The effect of BBR on Nrf2 relied on the activation of AMPK, PI3K/Akt, and P38 pathways. (3) BBR could suppress inflammation by blocking the MAPK pathways in an AMPK-dependent manner, inhibiting the classic NF-κB signaling pathway; inhibiting the Rho GTPase pathway, which was proved to play a role in NF-κB regulation, and attenuating the transcription activity of AP-1, which was possible to be mediated by PPARγ activation. The black lines/boxes and red lines/boxes indicate pathways and molecules involved in the antioxidant or anti-inflammatory activity of BBR, respectively. Red boxes with black frame indicate pathways and molecules responsible for both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of BBR. The symbols of “?” indicate possible mechanisms and pathways that need to be further verified. There was a vicious cycle between oxidative stress and inflammation, which was possibly able to be terminated by BBR administration.
Effects of BBR on inflammatory cytokines and inflammation in cultured cells or animals with diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance.
| References | Cell type, animal model | Administration of BBR | Samples examined | Effects of BBR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 3T3-L1 adipocytes | 10 | 3T3-L1 adipocytes | ↓: TNF- |
|
| ||||
| [ | HepG2 cells, palmitate induced insulin resistance | 0.1–10 | Culture media | ↓: TNF- |
|
| ||||
| [ | RAW 264.7 macrophages treated with LPS | 5 | RAW 264.7 macrophages | ↓: IL-1 |
|
| ||||
| [ | Mouse primary splenocytes treated with or without LPS | 0.8–3.3 | Culture media | ↓: TNF- |
|
| ||||
| [ | NIT-1 pancreatic | 1.25–5 | Culture media | ↓: TNF- |
|
| ||||
| [ | KM mice, obesity and insulin resistance induced by HFD feeding for 13 weeks | 50 or 150 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 2 weeks | Serum | ↓: TNF- |
|
| ||||
| [ | Wistar rats, STZ 50 mg/kg, single i.p. injection | 100 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 7 weeks | Serum | ↓: CRP |
|
| ||||
| [ | Wistar rats, NAFLD and insulin resistance induced by HFD for 8 weeks | 187.5 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 4 weeks | Liver | ↓: inflammatory cell infiltration |
|
| ||||
| [ | db/db mice | 5 mg/kg/d, i.p. for 4 weeks | White adipose tissue | ↓: TNF- |
|
| ||||
| [ | SD rats, STZ 60 mg/kg, single tail vein injection | 200 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 12 weeks | Kidney | ↓: ICAM-1, TGF- |
|
| ||||
| [ | NOD mice | 200 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 2 weeks | Supernatant from splenocytes, CD4+ T cells from spleen/lymph nodes | ↓: TNF- |
|
| ||||
|
[ | NOD mice | 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 14 weeks | Supernatant from splenocytes | ↑: IL-10/IL-1 |
| Kidney and liver | ↑: IL-10/IL-6 and IL-10/TNF- | |||
↓: decrease, ↑: increase; BBR: berberine, LPS: lipopolysaccharide, KM mice: Kunming mice, HFD: high fat diet, STZ: streptozotocin, NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, p.o.: per os/oral administration, i.p.: intraperitoneal, TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α, IL: interleukin, CRP: C-reaction protein, HP: haptoglobin, MMP9: matrix metalloprotease 9, COX2: cyclooxygenase-2, iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase, MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, ICAM-1: intercellular adhesionmolecule-1, TGF-β1: transforming growth factor-β1, IFNγ: interferon-γ.