Literature DB >> 24668458

Scaling of the mean and variance of population dynamics under fluctuating regimes.

Cino Pertoldi1, S Faurby, D H Reed, J Knape, M Björklund, P Lundberg, V Kaitala, V Loeschcke, L A Bach.   

Abstract

Theoretical ecologists have long sought to understand how the persistence of populations depends on the interactions between exogenous (biotic and abiotic) and endogenous (e.g., demographic and genetic) drivers of population dynamics. Recent work focuses on the autocorrelation structure of environmental perturbations and its effects on the persistence of populations. Accurate estimation of extinction times and especially determination of the mechanisms affecting extinction times is important for biodiversity conservation. Here we examine the interaction between environmental fluctuations and the scaling effect of the mean population size with its variance. We investigate how interactions between environmental and demographic stochasticity can affect the mean time to extinction, change optimal patch size dynamics, and how it can alter the often-assumed linear relationship between the census size and the effective population size. The importance of the correlation between environmental and demographic variation depends on the relative importance of the two types of variation. We found the correlation to be important when the two types of variation were approximately equal; however, the importance of the correlation diminishes as one source of variation dominates. The implications of these findings are discussed from a conservation and eco-evolutionary point of view.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24668458     DOI: 10.1007/s12064-014-0201-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theory Biosci        ISSN: 1431-7613            Impact factor:   1.919


  18 in total

1.  Extinction risk and the 1/f family of noise models.

Authors:  J M Halley; W E Kunin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Should metapopulation restoration strategies increase patch area or number of patches?

Authors:  Samuel C Nicol; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Environmental fluctuations and level of density-compensation strongly affects the probability of fixation and fixation times.

Authors:  M Björklund; E Ranta; V Kaitala; L A Bach; P Lundberg
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 4.  Demography in an increasingly variable world.

Authors:  Mark S Boyce; Chirakkal V Haridas; Charlotte T Lee
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Temporal autocorrelation and stochastic population growth.

Authors:  Shripad Tuljapurkar; C V Haridas
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  How is extinction risk related to population-size variability over time? A family of models for species with repeated extinction and immigration.

Authors:  Stéphane Legendre; Thomas W Schoener; Jean Clobert; David A Spiller
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Neutral biodiversity theory can explain the imbalance of phylogenetic trees but not the tempo of their diversification.

Authors:  T Jonathan Davies; Andrew P Allen; Luís Borda-de-Água; Jim Regetz; Carlos J Melián
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment.

Authors:  E G Leigh
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1981-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: big is bad, but only in the tropics.

Authors:  Susanne A Fritz; Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  On the brink between extinction and persistence.

Authors:  Cino Pertoldi; Lars A Bach; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 4.540

View more
  2 in total

1.  An optimal stopping approach for onset of fish migration.

Authors:  Hidekazu Yoshioka; Yuta Yaegashi
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Barn Owl Productivity Response to Variability of Vole Populations.

Authors:  Petr Pavluvčík; Karel Poprach; Ivo Machar; Jan Losík; Ana Gouveia; Emil Tkadlec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.