Literature DB >> 10607517

Extinction risk and the 1/f family of noise models.

J M Halley1, W E Kunin.   

Abstract

In order to predict extinction risk in the presence of reddened, or correlated, environmental variability, fluctuating parameters may be represented by the family of 1/f noises, a series of stochastic models with different levels of variation acting on different timescales. We compare the process of parameter estimation for three 1/f models (white, pink and brown noise) with each other, and with autoregressive noise models (which are not 1/f noises), using data from a model time-series (length, T) of population. We then calculate the expected increase in variance and the expected extinction risk for each model, and we use these to explore the implication of assuming an incorrect noise model. When parameterising these models, it is necessary to do so in terms of the measured ("sample") parameters rather than fundamental ("population") parameters. This is because these models are non-stationary: their parameters need not stabilize on measurement over long periods of time and are uniquely defined only over a specified "window" of timescales defined by a measurement process. We find that extinction forecasts can differ greatly between models, depending on the length, T, and the coefficient of variability, CV, of the time series used to parameterise the models, and on the length of time into the future which is to be projected. For the simplest possible models, ones with population itself the 1/f noise process, it is possible to predict the extinction risk based on CV of the observed time series. Our predictions, based on explicit formulae and on simulations, indicate that (a) for very short projection times relative to T, brown and pink noise models are usually optimistic relative to equivalent white noise model; (b) for projection timescales equal to and substantially greater than T, an equivalent brown or pink noise model usually predicts a greater extinction risk, unless CV is very large; and (c) except for very small values of CV, for timescales very much greater than T, the brown and pink models present a more optimistic picture than the white noise model. In most cases, a pink noise is intermediate between white and brown models. Thus, while reddening of environmental noise may increase the long-term extinction probability for stationary processes, this is not generally true for non-stationary processes, such as pink or brown noises. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10607517     DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1999.1424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  15 in total

1.  Environmental colour affects aspects of single-species population dynamics.

Authors:  O L Petchey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation.

Authors:  Chris D Thomas; Robert J Wilson; Owen T Lewis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Red environmental noise and the appearance of delayed density dependence in age-structured populations.

Authors:  Lin Jiang; Nan Shao
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The effect of autocorrelation in environmental variability on the persistence of populations: an experimental test.

Authors:  Nathan Pike; Thomas Tully; Patsy Haccou; Régis Ferrière
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Regularity underlies erratic population abundances in marine ecosystems.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Sean P Cornelius; John Janssen; Kimberly A Gray; Adilson E Motter
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Scaling of the mean and variance of population dynamics under fluctuating regimes.

Authors:  Cino Pertoldi; S Faurby; D H Reed; J Knape; M Björklund; P Lundberg; V Kaitala; V Loeschcke; L A Bach
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 1.919

7.  Patterns of temporal scaling of groundwater level fluctuation.

Authors:  Xue Yu; Reza Ghasemizadeh; Ingrid Y Padilla; David Kaeli; Akram Alshawabkeh
Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 5.722

8.  Heavy-tailed prediction error: a difficulty in predicting biomedical signals of 1/f noise type.

Authors:  Ming Li; Wei Zhao; Biao Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  On the brink between extinction and persistence.

Authors:  Cino Pertoldi; Lars A Bach; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  Confounding environmental colour and distribution shape leads to underestimation of population extinction risk.

Authors:  Mike S Fowler; Lasse Ruokolainen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.