BACKGROUND: Health care-related costs and satisfaction are compelling targets for quality improvement in cancer care delivery; however, little is known about how financial burden affects patient satisfaction. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient-reported financial burden (FB). Eligible patients were ≥ 21 years with solid tumor malignancy and were receiving chemotherapy or hormonal therapy for ≥ 1 month. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form assessed patient satisfaction with health care. Subjective FB related to cancer treatment was measured on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of 174 participants (32% response rate), 47% reported significant/catastrophic FB. Participants reported highest satisfaction with interpersonal manner and lowest satisfaction with financial aspects of care. In adjusted analysis, high FB was negatively associated with general satisfaction (coefficient: -.29), satisfaction with technical quality (coefficient: -.26), and satisfaction with financial aspects of care (coefficient: -.62). Older age was associated with higher scores in all satisfaction subscales except patient-physician communication and financial aspects. Annual household income of <$20,000 was associated with lower satisfaction scores in all subscales except time spent with doctor. High FB was not associated with patient satisfaction scores for accessibility and convenience, communication, interpersonal manner, or time spent with doctor. CONCLUSION: FB is a potentially modifiable correlate of poor satisfaction with cancer care including general satisfaction and satisfaction with the technical quality of care. Addressing cancer-associated FB may lead to improved satisfaction, which in turn can influence adherence, outcomes, and quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Health care-related costs and satisfaction are compelling targets for quality improvement in cancer care delivery; however, little is known about how financial burden affects patient satisfaction. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient-reported financial burden (FB). Eligible patients were ≥ 21 years with solid tumor malignancy and were receiving chemotherapy or hormonal therapy for ≥ 1 month. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form assessed patient satisfaction with health care. Subjective FB related to cancer treatment was measured on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of 174 participants (32% response rate), 47% reported significant/catastrophic FB. Participants reported highest satisfaction with interpersonal manner and lowest satisfaction with financial aspects of care. In adjusted analysis, high FB was negatively associated with general satisfaction (coefficient: -.29), satisfaction with technical quality (coefficient: -.26), and satisfaction with financial aspects of care (coefficient: -.62). Older age was associated with higher scores in all satisfaction subscales except patient-physician communication and financial aspects. Annual household income of <$20,000 was associated with lower satisfaction scores in all subscales except time spent with doctor. High FB was not associated with patient satisfaction scores for accessibility and convenience, communication, interpersonal manner, or time spent with doctor. CONCLUSION: FB is a potentially modifiable correlate of poor satisfaction with cancer care including general satisfaction and satisfaction with the technical quality of care. Addressing cancer-associated FB may lead to improved satisfaction, which in turn can influence adherence, outcomes, and quality of life.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cost of illness; Economics; Health insurance; Neoplasms; Patient satisfaction
Authors: Alfred I Neugut; Milayna Subar; Elizabeth Ty Wilde; Scott Stratton; Corey H Brouse; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Victor R Grann; Dawn L Hershman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Yousuf Zafar; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Deborah Schrag; Donald H Taylor; Amy M Goetzinger; Xiaoyin Zhong; Amy P Abernethy Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-02-26
Authors: Eduard Vrdoljak; Gyorgy Bodoky; Jacek Jassem; Razvan A Popescu; Jozef Mardiak; Robert Pirker; Tanja Čufer; Semir Bešlija; Alexandru Eniu; Vladimir Todorović; Kateřina Kubáčková; Galia Kurteva; Zorica Tomašević; Agim Sallaku; Snezhana Smichkoska; Žarko Bajić; Branimir I Šikić Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-07-08
Authors: Chuo Yew Ting; Guan Chou Teh; Kong Leong Yu; Haridah Alias; Hui Meng Tan; Li Ping Wong Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Charles W Given; Barbara A Given; Cathy J Bradley; John C Krauss; Alla Sikorskii; Eric Vachon Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Matthew P Banegas; Jennifer L Schneider; Alison J Firemark; John F Dickerson; Erin E Kent; Janet S de Moor; Katherine S Virgo; Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Zhiyuan Zheng; Alexandra M Varga; Lisa A Waiwaiole; Stephanie M Nutt; Aditi Narayan; K Robin Yabroff Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Sara Bouberhan; Meghan Shea; Alice Kennedy; Adrienne Erlinger; Hannah Stack-Dunnbier; Mary K Buss; Laureen Moss; Kathleen Nolan; Christopher Awtrey; John L Dalrymple; Leslie Garrett; Fong W Liu; Michele R Hacker; Katharine M Esselen Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 5.482