Literature DB >> 20592778

Impact of the cost of cancer treatment: an internet-based survey.

Maurie Markman1, Ryan Luce.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite considerable discussion in the medical literature and lay press regarding the increasing cost of cancer care, there is limited information available on the perceived impact of treatment costs on individual patients and their families.
METHODS: To directly address this issue, patients with cancer who had participated in an Internet-based oncology decision-support program and agreed to receive information concerning potential future surveys were asked via e-mail to complete a questionnaire dealing with treatment-related medical expenses.
RESULTS: Of 39,882 invitations sent to patients with cancers of the breast, colon, lung, and prostate, 1,767 (4.4%) were returned, which included a wide spectrum of disease, demographics, and annual incomes. Since diagnosis, 20% and 4% of patients reported having spent out of pocket more than $10,000 and more than $50,000, respectively, on treatment and medical care. Overall, 19% of patients and 39% of individuals with a yearly income of less than $40,000 reported the financial costs of treating their cancer had caused a "large amount of distress." Furthermore, although overall, 9% of patients stated they had decided "to not have a recommended cancer treatment because it was too expensive," this percentage increased to 25% for individuals with an income of less than $40,000.
CONCLUSION: This survey suggests that a substantial proportion of patients and their families experience considerable distress associated with the cost of cancer care delivery. Furthermore, these costs affect the decision of patients with cancer to receive recommended treatment. This is a particularly serious issue for individuals with a modest annual income.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20592778      PMCID: PMC2835484          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.091074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  14 in total

1.  Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods.

Authors:  R Jones; N Pitt
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires.

Authors:  Samuel D Gosling; Simine Vazire; Sanjay Srivastava; Oliver P John
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2004 Feb-Mar

4.  Addressing rising health care costs--a view from the Congressional Budget Office.

Authors:  Peter R Orszag; Philip Ellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Limits on Medicare's ability to control rising spending on cancer drugs.

Authors:  Peter B Bach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Unintended consequences of caps on Medicare drug benefits.

Authors:  John Hsu; Mary Price; Jie Huang; Richard Brand; Vicki Fung; Rita Hui; Bruce Fireman; Joseph P Newhouse; Joseph V Selby
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Practice patterns in the treatment of female urinary incontinence: a postal and internet survey.

Authors:  H L Kim; G S Gerber; R V Patel; C M Hollowell; G T Bales
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  An examination of the influence of patient race and ethnicity on expressed interest in learning about cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Maurie Markman; Judy Petersen; Robert Montgomery
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; K Robin Yabroff; Angela Meekins; Marie Topor; Elizabeth B Lamont; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2).

Authors:  Pam Leece; Mohit Bhandari; Sheila Sprague; Marc F Swiontkowski; Emil H Schemitsch; Paul Tornetta; P J Devereaux; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  The perceived cancer-related financial hardship among patients and their families: a systematic review.

Authors:  Meram Azzani; April Camilla Roslani; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Economic hardship of minority and non-minority cancer survivors 1 year after diagnosis: another long-term effect of cancer?

Authors:  Maria Pisu; Kelly M Kenzik; Robert A Oster; Patricia Drentea; Kimlin T Ashing; Mona Fouad; Michelle Y Martin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Insurance Coverage, Employment Status, and Financial Well-Being of Young Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Madeleine Jones; Patrick Edwards; Timothy Flanigan; Yevgeniya Kaganova; Kevin W Smith; Cheryll C Thomas; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan Rodriguez; Temeika Fairley; Gery P Guy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Counting the cost of cancer: out-of-pocket payments made by colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Alan Ó Céilleachair; Paul Hanly; Máiréad Skally; Eamonn O'Leary; Ciaran O'Neill; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Kanika Kapur; Anthony Staines; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Assessment of perceived cost to the patient and other barriers to clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Douglas J Weckstein; Christian A Thomas; Ivette F Emery; Barbara F Shea; Alison Fleury; Margaret E White; Elizabeth Chase; Cindy Robinson; Stacey Frazier; Christine Pilar
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  The Out-of-Pocket Cost Burden of Cancer Care-A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicolas Iragorri; Claire de Oliveira; Natalie Fitzgerald; Beverley Essue
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Cancer-Related Distress: Revisiting the Utility of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer Problem List in Women With Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Patricia I Jewett; Deanna Teoh; Sue Petzel; Heewon Lee; Audrey Messelt; Jeffrey Kendall; Dorothy Hatsukami; Susan A Everson-Rose; Anne H Blaes; Rachel I Vogel
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-02-24

8.  Financial toxicity, Part I: a new name for a growing problem.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.990

9.  The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Deborah Schrag; Donald H Taylor; Amy M Goetzinger; Xiaoyin Zhong; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-02-26

10.  Mood disturbance in glioma patients.

Authors:  A A Acquaye; E Vera-Bolanos; T S Armstrong; M R Gilbert; L Lin
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.