Literature DB >> 24668102

Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial.

K Nadine Phoa1, Frederike G I van Vilsteren1, Bas L A M Weusten2, Raf Bisschops3, Erik J Schoon4, Krish Ragunath5, Grant Fullarton6, Massimiliano Di Pietro7, Narayanasamy Ravi8, Mike Visser9, G Johan Offerhaus9, Cees A Seldenrijk10, Sybren L Meijer9, Fiebo J W ten Kate9, Jan G P Tijssen11, Jacques J G H M Bergman1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Barrett esophagus containing low-grade dysplasia is associated with an increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with a rapidly increasing incidence in the western world.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether endoscopic radiofrequency ablation could decrease the rate of neoplastic progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter randomized clinical trial that enrolled 136 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Barrett esophagus containing low-grade dysplasia at 9 European sites between June 2007 and June 2011. Patient follow-up ended May 2013.
INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either endoscopic treatment with radiofrequency ablation (ablation) or endoscopic surveillance (control). Ablation was performed with the balloon device for circumferential ablation of the esophagus or the focal device for targeted ablation, with a maximum of 5 sessions allowed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was neoplastic progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma during a 3-year follow-up since randomization. Secondary outcomes were complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia and adverse events.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive ablation and 68 to receive control. Ablation reduced the risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma by 25.0% (1.5% for ablation vs 26.5% for control; 95% CI, 14.1%-35.9%; P < .001) and the risk of progression to adenocarcinoma by 7.4% (1.5% for ablation vs 8.8% for control; 95% CI, 0%-14.7%; P = .03). Among patients in the ablation group, complete eradication occurred in 92.6% for dysplasia and 88.2% for intestinal metaplasia compared with 27.9% for dysplasia and 0.0% for intestinal metaplasia among patients in the control group (P < .001). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19.1% of patients receiving ablation (P < .001). The most common adverse event was stricture, occurring in 8 patients receiving ablation (11.8%), all resolved by endoscopic dilation (median, 1 session). The data and safety monitoring board recommended early termination of the trial due to superiority of ablation for the primary outcome and the potential for patient safety issues if the trial continued. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized trial of patients with Barrett esophagus and a confirmed diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia, radiofrequency ablation resulted in a reduced risk of neoplastic progression over 3 years of follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR1198.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24668102     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.2511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  190 in total

1.  Novel Screening Alternatives for Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Anamay Sharma; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-05

Review 2.  Endoscopic options for treatment of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  R Brooks Vance; Kerry B Dunbar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-25

Review 3.  Endoluminal therapies for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Carmen L Mueller; Lorenzo E Ferri
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Barrett's Esophagus: A Comprehensive and Contemporary Review for Pathologists.

Authors:  Bita V Naini; Rhonda F Souza; Robert D Odze
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Changes in gene expression of neo-squamous mucosa after endoscopic treatment for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus and intramucosal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Angelique Levert-Mignon; Michael J Bourke; Sarah J Lord; Andrew C Taylor; Antony R Wettstein; Melanie Edwards; Natalia K Botelho; Rebecca Sonson; Chatura Jayasekera; Oliver M Fisher; Melissa L Thomas; Finlay Macrae; Damian J Hussey; David I Watson; Reginald V Lord
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Treatment of esophagogastric junction carcinoma: an unsolved debate.

Authors:  Michele Orditura; Gennaro Galizia; Eva Lieto; Ferdinando De Vita; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Radiofrequency Ablation Is Associated With Decreased Neoplastic Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus and Confirmed Low-Grade Dysplasia.

Authors:  Aaron J Small; James L Araujo; Cadman L Leggett; Aaron H Mendelson; Anant Agarwalla; Julian A Abrams; Charles J Lightdale; Timothy C Wang; Prasad G Iyer; Kenneth K Wang; Anil K Rustgi; Gregory G Ginsberg; Kimberly A Forde; Phyllis A Gimotty; James D Lewis; Gary W Falk; Meenakshi Bewtra
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Medicine (Abingdon)       Date:  2019-04-03

Review 9.  Endoscopic or Surgical Resection for Gastro-Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Albrecht Hoffmeister
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  A Tissue Systems Pathology Assay for High-Risk Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne; Lucas C Duits; Jeffrey W Prichard; Jon M Davison; Blair A Jobe; Bruce B Campbell; Yi Zhang; Kathleen A Repa; Lia M Reese; Jinhong Li; David L Diehl; Nirag C Jhala; Gregory Ginsberg; Maureen DeMarshall; Tyler Foxwell; Ali H Zaidi; D Lansing Taylor; Anil K Rustgi; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.