Literature DB >> 24667145

Sensitivity and feeding efficiency of the black garden ant Lasius niger to sugar resources.

Claire Detrain1, Jacques Prieur2.   

Abstract

Carbohydrate sources such as plant exudates, nectar and honeydew represent the main source of energy for many ant species and contribute towards maintaining their mutualistic relationships with plants or aphid colonies. Here we characterise the sensitivity, feeding response curve and food intake efficiency of the aphid tending ant, Lasius niger for major sugars found in nectar, honeydew and insect haemolymph (i.e. fructose, glucose, sucrose, melezitose and trehalose). We found that sucrose concentrations - ranging from 0.1 to 2.5 M - triggered food acceptance by L.niger workers with their food intake efficiency being enhanced by sugar concentrations of 1M or higher at which points energy intake was maximised. The range of sucrose concentrations that elicit a feeding response by L. niger scouts thus overlaps with that of natural sugar resources. The response curves of feeding acceptance by scouts consistently increased with sugar concentration, except for trehalose which was disregarded by the ants. Ants are highly sensitive to sucrose and melezitose exhibiting low response thresholds. Sucrose, fructose and glucose share a same potential to act as phagostimulants as they had similar half feeding efficiency concentration values when expressed as the energetic content of sugar solution. Aphid-biosynthezised melezitose generated the highest sensitivity and phagostimulant potential. The feeding behavior of ants appears to be primarily regulated by the energy content of the food solution for the main sugars present in nectar and honeydew. However, feeding by scouts is also influenced by the informative value of individual sugars when it serves as a cue for the presence of aphid partners such as the aphid-biosynthesised melezitose.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ant; Food intake; Response curve; Sugars; Taste sensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24667145     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  9 in total

1.  Response of a Predatory ant to Volatiles Emitted by Aphid- and Caterpillar-Infested Cucumber and Potato Plants.

Authors:  Mauro Schettino; Donato A Grasso; Berhane T Weldegergis; Cristina Castracani; Alessandra Mori; Marcel Dicke; Joop C Van Lenteren; Joop J A Van Loon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Multi-modal cue integration in the black garden ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Felix Benjamin Oberhauser; Maria Loconsole; Gabriella Galli; Federica Dal Cin; Enzo Moretto; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Combined Elevation of Temperature and CO2 Impacts the Production and Sugar Composition of Aphid Honeydew.

Authors:  S Blanchard; F Verheggen; I Van De Vreken; A Richel; C Detrain
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.793

4.  Preference and effect of gustatory sense on sugar-feeding of fire ants.

Authors:  Waqar Jaleel; Lihua Lyu; Qunchen Li; Qingxing Shi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Extrafloral-nectar-based partner manipulation in plant-ant relationships.

Authors:  D A Grasso; C Pandolfi; N Bazihizina; D Nocentini; M Nepi; S Mancuso
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  Nest Entrances, Spatial Fidelity, and Foraging Patterns in the Red Ant Myrmica rubra: A Field and Theoretical Study.

Authors:  Marine Lehue; Claire Detrain; Bertrand Collignon
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 7.  Regulation of Ant Foraging: A Review of the Role of Information Use and Personality.

Authors:  Swetashree Kolay; Raphaël Boulay; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-28

8.  A fungus infected environment does not alter the behaviour of foraging ants.

Authors:  Hugo Pereira; Romain Willeput; Claire Detrain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Irrational risk aversion in an ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Daniel Grimwade; Richard Bach; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.084

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.