Literature DB >> 34876627

A fungus infected environment does not alter the behaviour of foraging ants.

Hugo Pereira1, Romain Willeput2, Claire Detrain3.   

Abstract

Eusocial insects are exposed to a wide range of pathogens while foraging outside their nest. We know that opportunistic scavenging ants are able to assess the sanitary state of food and to discriminate a prey which died from infection by the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium brunneum. Here, we investigate whether a contamination of the environment can also influence the behaviour of foragers, both at the individual and collective level. In a Y-maze, Myrmica rubra ants had the choice to forage on two prey patches, one of which containing sporulating items. Unexpectedly, the nearby presence of sporulating bodies did not deter foragers nor prevent them from retrieving palatable prey. Ant colonies exploited both prey patches equally, without further mortality resulting from foraging on the contaminated area. Thus, a contamination of the environment did not prompt an active avoidance by foragers of which the activity depended primarily on the food characteristics. Generalist entomopathogenic fungi such as M. brunneum in the area around the nest appear more to be of a nuisance to ant foragers than a major selective force driving them to adopt avoidance strategies. We discuss the cost-benefit balance derived from the fine-tuning of strategies of pathogen avoidance in ants.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34876627      PMCID: PMC8651729          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02817-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  37 in total

1.  The influence of the physical environment on the self-organised foraging patterns of ants.

Authors:  C Detrain; C Natan; J L Deneubourg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2001-04

2.  Insect immunity shows specificity in protection upon secondary pathogen exposure.

Authors:  Ben M Sadd; Paul Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Competition between ant species: outcome controlled by parasitic flies.

Authors:  D H Feener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The expression and impact of antifungal grooming in ants.

Authors:  A Reber; J Purcell; S D Buechel; P Buri; M Chapuisat
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Directional fidelity as a foraging constraint in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis.

Authors:  Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Ants detect but do not discriminate diseased workers within their nest.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Leclerc; Claire Detrain
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-07-30

7.  No evidence of queen immunisation despite transgenerational immunisation in Crematogaster scutellaris ants.

Authors:  Adele Bordoni; Irene Tatini; Cristina Puente Romero; Brunella Perito; Stefano Turillazzi; Leonardo Dapporto
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.354

8.  Food recruitment strategies of the ants Myrmica sabuleti and Myrmica ruginodis.

Authors:  M C Cammaerts; R Cammaerts
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Recognition and avoidance of contaminated flowers by foraging bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Authors:  Bertrand Fouks; H Michael G Lattorff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of Twelve Ant Species and Their Susceptibility to Fungal Infection.

Authors:  Nick Bos; Viljami Kankaanpää-Kukkonen; Dalial Freitak; Dimitri Stucki; Liselotte Sundström
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.