| Literature DB >> 24666603 |
Mario Inacio, Alice S Ryan, Woei-Nan Bair, Michelle Prettyman, Brock A Beamer, Mark W Rogers1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impaired balance, loss of mobility and falls are major problems associated with changes in muscle in older adults. However, the extent to which muscle composition and related performance measures for different lower limb muscles are associated with falls in older individuals is unclear. This study evaluated lower limb muscle attenuation, intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) infiltration and muscle performance in older fallers and non-fallers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24666603 PMCID: PMC4101852 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Comparison between non-faller and faller groups on the sample demographics
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 74.0 ± 1.1 | 73.0 ± 1.1 | |
| Height ( | 166.9 ± 1.3 | 165.6 ± 2.5 | |
| Weight ( | 75.1 ± 2.2 | 79.0 ± 5.0 | |
| 26.7 ± 0.5 | 28.2 ± 1.3 | ||
| Fat Mass ( | 26.7 ± 1.1 | 31.0 ± 2.5 | |
| Fat-Free Mass ( | 45.8 ± 1.4 | 47.2 ± 3.4 | |
| % Fat Mass | 35.4 ± 0.9 | 38.3 ± 1.7 | |
| Hypertension | 22.4 | 13.8 | |
| Hyperlipidemia | 31.0 | 19.0 | |
| Diabetes | 3.4 | 1.7 | |
| Coronary disease | 1.7 | 3.4 | |
| Edema (lower limbs) | 3.4 | 3.4 | |
| Painful joints | 19.0 | 15.5 | |
| Osteoarthritis | 24.1 | 13.8 | |
| Osteoporosis | 10.3 | 6.9 | |
| Depression | 1.7 | 6.9 | |
| Incontinence | 1.7 | 1.7 | |
| Asthma | 5.2 | 1.7 | |
| 1 | 0 | 66.7 | |
| 2 | 0 | 26.7 | |
| 3 | 0 | 6.7 | |
Data is expressed as Mean ± SEM. Comparisons significant for p < 0.05.
Figure 1Representative example of computed tomography (CT) scans from an older adult showing A) abdominal scan; B) hip scan; C) thigh scan. 1. Psoas; 2. Gluteus Medius and Minimus; 3. Gluteus Maximus; 4. Rectus Femoris; 5. Vastus Lateralis; 6. Hamstrings compartment; 7. Adductor Magnus and Longus.
Figure 2Comparison between non-faller and faller groups for muscle attenuation (). Data expressed as Mean ± SEM. * indicates significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Comparison between non-faller and faller groups for normalized intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) (%). Data expressed as Mean ± SEM. *indicates significant difference (p < 0.05).
Comparison between non-faller and faller groups on normalized peak isokinetic torque (N.Kg −)
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Knee Extension | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.61 ± 0.03 | |
| Knee Flexion | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | |
| Hip Extension | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | |
| Hip Flexion | 0.59 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | |
| Hip Abduction | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | * |
| Hip Adduction | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.02 |
Data is expressed as Mean ± SEM. *indicates significant difference (p < 0.05).