BACKGROUND: Intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) of the lower extremity is a strong negative predictor of mobility function. Variability in temporal gait factors is another important predictor of mobility function. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between IMAT in the hip and thigh muscles, balance, and temporal gait variability in older adults. METHODS: Forty-eight healthy community dwelling older adults (74 +/- 1 year) underwent a CT scan to quantify IMAT in the gluteus maximus (Gmax), gluteus medius/minimus (Gmed/min), hamstrings, vastus lateralis, and adductor muscles. Temporal Gait measures were collected on a GAITRite walkway and gait variability was determined by calculating intraindividual standard deviations. Individuals were divided by tertiles of temporal gait variability into categories of high, medium, and low variability. Differences in the IMAT of the hip abductors were calculated for those with high and low gait variability and partial correlations for gait variability and all muscle composition measures were determined for all variables with normalized gait speed as a covariate. RESULTS: Gmed/min IMAT was greater in those with higher gait variability compared to those with lower gait variability (p<0.05). Gmed/min IMAT was related to stride width variability (r=0.30, p<0.05). Gmax IMAT was also related to time variability of swing (r=0.42), stance (r=0.26), double limb support (r=0.43), double support loading (r=0.44), and double support unloading (r=0.50) (all p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Increased IMAT in the proximal hip muscles, particularly the hip abductors, was associated with increased gait variability and poorer balance. These findings may have implications for the assessment and treatment of balance and falls such that interventions for enhancing balance and mobility among older individuals should take into account the importance of gluteal muscle composition.
BACKGROUND: Intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) of the lower extremity is a strong negative predictor of mobility function. Variability in temporal gait factors is another important predictor of mobility function. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between IMAT in the hip and thigh muscles, balance, and temporal gait variability in older adults. METHODS: Forty-eight healthy community dwelling older adults (74 +/- 1 year) underwent a CT scan to quantify IMAT in the gluteus maximus (Gmax), gluteus medius/minimus (Gmed/min), hamstrings, vastus lateralis, and adductor muscles. Temporal Gait measures were collected on a GAITRite walkway and gait variability was determined by calculating intraindividual standard deviations. Individuals were divided by tertiles of temporal gait variability into categories of high, medium, and low variability. Differences in the IMAT of the hip abductors were calculated for those with high and low gait variability and partial correlations for gait variability and all muscle composition measures were determined for all variables with normalized gait speed as a covariate. RESULTS:Gmed/min IMAT was greater in those with higher gait variability compared to those with lower gait variability (p<0.05). Gmed/min IMAT was related to stride width variability (r=0.30, p<0.05). Gmax IMAT was also related to time variability of swing (r=0.42), stance (r=0.26), double limb support (r=0.43), double support loading (r=0.44), and double support unloading (r=0.50) (all p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Increased IMAT in the proximal hip muscles, particularly the hip abductors, was associated with increased gait variability and poorer balance. These findings may have implications for the assessment and treatment of balance and falls such that interventions for enhancing balance and mobility among older individuals should take into account the importance of gluteal muscle composition.
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; David Wert; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: J Geriatr Phys Ther Date: 2012 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 3.381
Authors: Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Bret H Goodpaster; Anne B Newman; Michael Nevitt; Elizabeth Stamm; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Bret H Goodpaster; Peter Chomentowski; Bryan K Ward; Andrea Rossi; Nancy W Glynn; Matthew J Delmonico; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Marco Pahor; Anne B Newman Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2008-09-25
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Jaime E Berlin; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2005-07-26 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Kerri M Winters-Stone; Esther Moe; Julie N Graff; Nathan F Dieckmann; Sydnee Stoyles; Carolyn Borsch; Joshi J Alumkal; Christopher L Amling; Tomasz M Beer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Odessa Addison; Mario Inacio; Woei-Nan Bair; Brock A Beamer; Alice S Ryan; Mark W Rogers Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Derik L Davis; Andrew Roberts; Rodolfo Calderon; Shihyun Kim; Alice S Ryan; Tatiana V D Sanses Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 2.128
Authors: Jessica W Smith; Robin L Marcus; Brian L Tracy; K Bo Foreman; Jesse C Christensen; Paul C LaStayo Journal: Hum Mov Sci Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 2.161
Authors: D Scott; T Trbojevic; E Skinner; R A Clark; P Levinger; T P Haines; K M Sanders; P R Ebeling Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.041