Literature DB >> 24664370

Transient cerebral hypoperfusion assisted intraarterial cationic liposome delivery to brain tissue.

Shailendra Joshi1, Rajinder P Singh-Moon, Mei Wang, Durba B Chaudhuri, Mark Holcomb, Ninfa L Straubinger, Jeffrey N Bruce, Irving J Bigio, Robert M Straubinger.   

Abstract

Transient cerebral hypoperfusion (TCH) has empirically been used to assist intraarterial (IA) drug delivery to brain tumors. Transient (<3 min) reduction of cerebral blood flow (CBF) occurs during many neuro- and cardiovascular interventions and has recently been used to better target IA drugs to brain tumors. In the present experiments, we assessed whether the effectiveness of IA delivery of cationic liposomes could be improved by TCH. Cationic liposomes composed of 1:1 DOTAP:PC (dioleoyl-trimethylammonium-propane:phosphatidylcholine) were administered to three groups of Sprague-Dawley rats. In the first group, we tested the effect of blood flow reduction on IA delivery of cationic liposomes. In the second group, we compared TCH-assisted IA liposomal delivery versus intravenous (IV) administration of the same dose. In the third group, we assessed retention of cationic liposomes in brain 4 h after TCH assisted delivery. The liposomes contained a near infrared dye, DilC18(7), whose concentration could be measured in vivo by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. IA injections of cationic liposomes during TCH increased their delivery approximately fourfold compared to injections during normal blood flow. Optical pharmacokinetic measurements revealed that relative to IV injections, IA injection of cationic liposomes during TCH produced tissue concentrations that were 100-fold greater. The cationic liposomes were retained in the brain tissue 4 h after a single IA injection. There was no gross impairment of neurological functions in surviving animals. Transient reduction in CBF significantly increased IA delivery of cationic liposomes in the brain. High concentrations of liposomes could be delivered to brain tissue after IA injections with concurrent TCH while none could be detected after IV injection. IA-TCH injections were well tolerated and cationic liposomes were retained for at least 4 h after IA administration. These results should encourage development of cationic liposomal formulations of chemotherapeutic drugs and their IA delivery during TCH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664370      PMCID: PMC4038763          DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1421-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  28 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing liposomes for delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to solid tumors.

Authors:  D C Drummond; O Meyer; K Hong; D B Kirpotin; D Papahadjopoulos
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole to induce transient profound systemic hypotension in patients undergoing endovascular therapy. Dose-response characteristics.

Authors:  T Hashimoto; W L Young; B D Aagaard; S Joshi; N D Ostapkovich; J Pile-Spellman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Phosphorus assay in column chromatography.

Authors:  G R BARTLETT
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Nano-sized cationic polymeric magnetic liposomes significantly improves drug delivery to the brain in rats.

Authors:  Ming Zhao; Jin Chang; Xiangping Fu; Chao Liang; Shuli Liang; Runmin Yan; Anmin Li
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.121

5.  Reducing cerebral blood flow increases the duration of electroencephalographic silence by intracarotid thiopental.

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Mei Wang; Joshua J Etu; John Pile-Spellman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics and in vivo drug release rates in liposomal nanocarrier development.

Authors:  Daryl C Drummond; Charles O Noble; Mark E Hayes; John W Park; Dmitri B Kirpotin
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 7.  Arterial drug infusion: pharmacokinetic problems and pitfalls.

Authors:  R L Dedrick
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-03-16       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Arterial drug infusion with extracorporeal removal. I. Theoretic basis with particular reference to the brain.

Authors:  R L Dedrick; E H Oldfield; J M Collins
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1984-02

9.  Noninvasive, in-situ measurement of drug concentrations in tissue using optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  I J Bigio; J R Mourant; G Los
Journal:  J Gravit Physiol       Date:  1999-07

10.  Optical method for real-time monitoring of drug concentrations facilitates the development of novel methods for drug delivery to brain tissue.

Authors:  Roberto Reif; Mei Wang; Shailendra Joshi; Ousama A'Amar; Irving J Bigio
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Super selective intra-arterial cerebral infusion of modern chemotherapeutics after blood-brain barrier disruption: where are we now, and where we are going.

Authors:  Randy S D'Amico; Deepak Khatri; Noah Reichman; Nitesh V Patel; Tamika Wong; Sherese R Fralin; Mona Li; Jason A Ellis; Rafael Ortiz; David J Langer; John A Boockvar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Flow arrest intra-arterial delivery of small TAT-decorated and neutral micelles to gliomas.

Authors:  Juliane Nguyen; Shaolie S Hossain; Johann R N Cooke; Jason A Ellis; Michael B Deci; Charles W Emala; Jeffrey N Bruce; Irving J Bigio; Robert M Straubinger; Shailendra Joshi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Computational pharmacokinetic rationale for intra-arterial delivery to the brain.

Authors:  Johann N R Cooke; Jason A Ellis; Shaolie Hossain; Juliane Nguyen; Jeffrey N Bruce; Shailendra Joshi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Cationizable lipid micelles as vehicles for intraarterial glioma treatment.

Authors:  Juliane Nguyen; Johann R N Cooke; Jason A Ellis; Michael Deci; Charles W Emala; Jeffrey N Bruce; Irving J Bigio; Robert M Straubinger; Shailendra Joshi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Intraarterial drug delivery for glioblastoma mutiforme: Will the phoenix rise again?

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Jason A Ellis; Eugene Ornstein; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Targeting brain tumors by intra-arterial delivery of cell-penetrating peptides: a novel approach for primary and metastatic brain malignancy.

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Johann R N Cooke; Jason A Ellis; Charles W Emala; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Intra-arterial administration improves temozolomide delivery and efficacy in a model of intracerebral metastasis, but has unexpected brain toxicity.

Authors:  Leslie L Muldoon; Michael A Pagel; Joao Prola Netto; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Cerebral hypoperfusion-assisted intra-arterial deposition of liposomes in normal and glioma-bearing rats.

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Rajinder P Singh-Moon; Jason A Ellis; Durba B Chaudhuri; Mei Wang; Roberto Reif; Jeffrey N Bruce; Irving J Bigio; Robert M Straubinger
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Safety, feasibility, and optimization of intra-arterial mitoxantrone delivery to gliomas.

Authors:  Jason A Ellis; Johann Cooke; Rajinder P Singh-Moon; Mei Wang; Jeffrey N Bruce; Charles W Emala; Irving J Bigio; Shailendra Joshi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Liposome size and charge optimization for intraarterial delivery to gliomas.

Authors:  Shailendra Joshi; Johann R N Cooke; Darren K W Chan; Jason A Ellis; Shaolie S Hossain; Rajinder P Singh-Moon; Mei Wang; Irving J Bigio; Jeffrey N Bruce; Robert M Straubinger
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.